Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Procedure for Determining the Industrial Profitability of Settlement Interventions in the Appraisal of Exceptional Contribution of Urbanisation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2018 (ICCSA 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10962))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The exceptional contribution of urbanisation (hereinafter simply exceptional contribution) is a regulatory obligation that represents an additional to the costs of primary and secondary urbanisation, at least equal to 50% of the greater value generated by projects in areas or buildings with modifications to town planning. The rule that introduced the exceptional contribution does not indicate the factors to be considered while evaluating the exceptional contribution, and consequently does not address the evaluation procedure to be used in determining its exact form. In this paper, an idea will be proposed regarding the urban development exceptional contribution as it has been applied in Italy both in regional regulations and in various Local Authorities. From this overview, the approach of the different LAs can be seen. Each has autonomously decided upon the adoption of an analytical procedure to estimate the Transformation Value to calculate the extra contribution. Subsequently, in light of the result of not considering a specific rate of return during the estimation of the exceptional contribution, a procedure is proposed for determining the rate of return to be considered in the indirect analytical procedure for estimating the Value of Transformation used to calculate the exceptional urbanisation contribution. The proposed procedure is based on the Build-up Method and will take the form of its operational declination, to be used when one has the coefficients representative of the areas of risk for the different factors that are typical of interventions of settlement transformation. To test the proposed procedure it has been applied to a case study: the evaluation of exceptional contribution in an Integrated Intervention Program in the Municipality of Grottaferrata (RM).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Only 3 Regions (Piemonte, Veneto, Marche) have included the exceptional contribution in their regulations, offering a definition of the methods used for calculating it.

  2. 2.

    The analysis has been carried out considering the local regulatory framework of 20 Municipalities: Albisola Superiore, Ancona, Biella, Bussoleno, Caraglio, Cavaion Veronese, Carmagnola, Cuneo, Falconara Marittima, Ferrara, Fiano Romano, Finale Ligure, Novi Ligure, Lecce, Roccagloriosa, Roma, San Benedetto del Tronto, Thiene, Venezia, Vescovana.

  3. 3.

    The recognition of the inconsistency of the exceptional urbanisation contribution and the related commitments of the developer came following a complex administrative-procedural process that saw the involvement of the Department of Architecture and Planning of the University of Rome “La Sapienza” for the purposes of technical-scientific support, scrutiny and supervision of the Grottaferrata Council as part of the “Grand Hotel Traiano” Integrated Intervention Program.

  4. 4.

    Since this is a historical estimate, all the data based on valuations refer to the year 2006.

References

  1. Berger, A.: Drosscape: Wasting Land in Urban America. Princeton Architectural Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Torre, C.M., Morano, P., Tajani, F.: Saving soil for sustainable land use. Sustainability 9, 350 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. George, D., Lin, B.C.A., Chen, Y.: A circular economy model of economic growth. Environ. Model. Softw. 73, 60–63 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. European Commission: Green Paper on Public Private Partnerships (2004). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=LEGISSUM:l22012&from=IT. Accessed 31 Jan 2018

  5. Battisti, F., Guarini, M.R.: Public interest evaluation in negotiated public-private partnership. Int. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Mak. 7(1), 54–89 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morano, P., Tajani, F.: Saving soil and financial feasibility. A model to support the public-private partnerships in the regeneration of abandoned areas. Land Use Policy 73, 40–48 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Magni, C.B.: Investment, financing and the role of ROA and WACC in value creation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 244(3), 855–866 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Massari, M., Roncaglio, F., Zanetti, L.: On the equivalence between the APV and the WACC approach in a growing leveraged firm. Eur. Finan. Manag. 14(1), 152–162 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Luehrman, T.A.: Using APV (adjusted present value): a better tool for valuing operations. Harvard Bus. Rev. 75(3), 145–154 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cacciamani, C.: Il rischio immobiliare: una soluzione di rating dell’investimento immobiliare. Egea, Milano (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mercer, Z.C.: The adjusted capital asset pricing model for developing capitalization rates: an extension of previous “build-up” methodologies based upon the capital asset pricing model. Bus. Valuat. Rev. 8(4), 147–156 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. The European Group of Valuers’ Associations (TEGoVA), Rating Europeo della Proprietà e del Mercato. PAM (Property and Market Rating). Una guida per il valutatore. https://www.isivi.it/pamIT.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2018

  13. Forte, C., De’ Rossi, B., Ruffolo, G.: Principi di economia ed estimo. Etas libri, Milano (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  14. International Valuation Standards Committee. International Valuation Standards. IVSC, London (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keynes, J.M.: Teoria Generale Della Moneta, Dell’interesse e Dell’occupazione. UTET, Torino (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tajani, F., Morano, P.: Evaluation of vacant and redundant public properties and risk control. A model for the definition of the optimal mix of eligible functions. J. Prop. Invest. Finan. 35(1), 75–100 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Browun, G.R., Matysiak, G.A.: Real Estate Investment: A Capital Market Approach. Prentice Hall-Pearson Education, Harlow (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chaney, A., Hoesli, M.: The interest rate sensitivity of real estate. J. Prop. Res. 27, 61–85 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chaney, A., Hoesli, M.: Transaction-based and appraisal-based capitalization rate determinants. Int. Real Estate Rev. 18, 1–43 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wofford, L.E.: A simulation approach to the appraisal of income producing real estate. Real Estate Econ. 6, 370–394 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Simonotti, M.: Ricerca del saggio di capitalizzazione nel mercato immobiliare. Aestimum 59, 171–180 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ambrose, B.W., Nourse, H.O.: Factor influencing capitalization rate. J. Real Estate Res. 8, 221–237 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chichernea, D., Miller, N., Fisher, J., Sklarz, M., White, B.: A cross sectional analysis of cap rates by MSA. J. Real Estate Res. 30, 249–292 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Battisti, F., Campo, O.: The appraisal of buildable land for property taxation in the adopted general municipal plan. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9788, pp. 22–32. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42111-7_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. McNeil, A.J., Frey, R., Embrechts, P.: Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Campo, O., Rocca, F.: The parameterization of physical quantities in the definition of parametric costs the legislative decree n. 50/2016 on public works design. Valori Valutazioni 19, 3–9 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Guarini, M.R., Battisti, F.: Benchmarking multi-criteria evaluation methodology’s application for the definition of benchmarks in a negotiation-type public-private partnership. A case of study: the integrated action programmes of the Lazio Region. Int. J. Bus. Intell. Data Min. 9, 271–317 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbidm.2014.068456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Campo, O.: Appraisal of the extraordinary contribution in general regulatory plan of Rome. Int. J. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 9, 404–409 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Architecture and Design (DIAP), Faculty of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Flaminia 359, 00196, Rome, Italy

    Fabrizio Battisti & Orazio Campo

Authors
  1. Fabrizio Battisti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Orazio Campo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fabrizio Battisti or Orazio Campo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy

    Osvaldo Gervasi

  2. University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy

    Beniamino Murgante

  3. Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria

    Sanjay Misra

  4. Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

    Elena Stankova

  5. Polytechnic University of Bari, Bari, Italy

    Carmelo M. Torre

  6. University of Minho, Braga, Portugal

    Ana Maria A.C. Rocha

  7. Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

    David Taniar

  8. Kyushu Sangyo University, Fukuoka shi, Fukuoka, Japan

    Bernady O. Apduhan

  9. Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy

    Eufemia Tarantino

  10. Myongji University, Yongin, Korea (Republic of)

    Yeonseung Ryu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Battisti, F., Campo, O. (2018). A Procedure for Determining the Industrial Profitability of Settlement Interventions in the Appraisal of Exceptional Contribution of Urbanisation. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2018. ICCSA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10962. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95168-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95168-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95167-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95168-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation