Skip to main content

Comparison of Moving Object Segmentation Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Communication Technology for Development for Africa (ICT4DA 2017)

Abstract

Moving object segmentation is the extraction of meaningful features from series of images. In this paper, different types of moving object segmentation techniques such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA), K-Means clustering (KM), Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Genetic Algorithm Initialized K-means clustering (GAIK) have been compared. From our analysis we have observed that PCA reduces dimension or size of data for further processing, which in return reduces the computational time. However, the segmentation quality sometimes becomes unacceptable. On the other hand, due to random initialization of its centroids, KM clustering sometimes converges to local minimum which results in bad segmentation. Another algorithm which has been considered in this study is GA, which searches all the feature space and results in a global optimum clustering. Although the segmentation quality is good, it is computationally expensive. To mitigate these problems, KM and GA are merged to form GAIK, where GA helps to initialize the centroids of the clustering. From our study, it has been found out that GAIK is superior to GA in both the quality of segmentation and computational time. Therefore, in general, the analyses of the four algorithms shows that GAIK is optimal for segmenting a moving object.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Otsu, N: Discriminant and least square threshold selection. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 592–596 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, et al.: Threshold segmentation for hand vein image. In: Control Theory and Application, pp. 19–22. Publishing House of Electronics Industry, Beijing (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shi, J., Malik, J.: Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Mach. Intell. 22, 888–905 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Han, J., Kamber, M.: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Burlington (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Pena, J., Lozano, J., Larranaga, P.: An empirical comparison of four initialization methods for the K-means algorithm. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 20(10), 1027–1040 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaufman, L., Rousseeuw, P.: Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction To Cluster Analysis. Wiley, Hoboken (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeyakumari, D., Somasundareswari, D.: Analysis on genetic current trends in color image segmentation. Int. J. Mod. Sci. Eng. Technol. (IJMSET) 1(5), 1–12 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gao, X.: Fuzzy Cluster Analysis and Application, pp. 124–130. Xidian University Press, Xi’an (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, Q.: One image segmentation technique based on wavelet analysis in the context of texture. In: Data Collection and Processing, vol. 13, p. 1216 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kang, W.X., et al.: The comparative research on image segmentation algorithms. In: IEEE, First International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science, pp. 703–707 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. www.visiondummy.com/2014/05/feature-extraction-using-pca/index.html

  12. Dubes, R.C., Jain, A.K.: Clustering techniques: the user’s dilemma. Pattern Recogn. 8(4), 247–260 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Maulik, U., Bandyopadhyay, S.: Genetic algorithm based clustering technique. Pattern Recogn. 33(9), 1455–1465 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fogel, D.B.: An introduction to simulated evolutionary optimization. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 5(1), 3–14 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. http://www.geatbx.com/docu/algindex-01.html#TopOfPage

  16. Lu, Y., Lu, S., Fotouhi, F., Deng, Y., Brown, S.: FGKA: a fast genetic k-means clustering algorithm. In: ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Krishna, K., Murty, M.N.: Genetic k-means algorithm. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 29(3), 433–439 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. https://media.xiph.org/video/derf/y4m/hall_objects_qcif.y4m

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaecob Girmay Gezahegn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gezahegn, Y.G., Gebreselasie, A.K., Gebreal, D.H.M.W., Hagos, M.A. (2018). Comparison of Moving Object Segmentation Techniques. In: Mekuria, F., Nigussie, E., Dargie, W., Edward, M., Tegegne, T. (eds) Information and Communication Technology for Development for Africa. ICT4DA 2017. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 244. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95153-9_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95153-9_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95152-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95153-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics