Advertisement

Brazil in the Context of the Debate Over Unamendability in Latin America

  • Juliano Zaiden BenvindoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (IUSGENT, volume 68)

Abstract

Unamendability appears to be a contradictory concept in Latin America. Though the rate among its countries varies strongly and the pace of constitutional replacements has waned in the last years, Latin America has long been portrayed as the region where changing the constitution is a common pattern. This paper will explore how this debate has taken place in Brazil, a major player in Latin America whose constitutionalism has been rather underexplored, though unamendability has long been regarded as a logical concept in its constitutionalism. Brazil is an interesting example since it has inscribed far-reaching unamendable provisions in its Constitution and has struck down constitutional amendments through judicial review in some relevant cases. Moreover, the fact that it had set out unamendable clauses in the constitutional text has not prevented its Supreme Court and the constitutional literature from going further in interpreting the scope of such clauses, expanding thereby the very concept of unamendability.

References

  1. Albert R (2018) Constitutional amendment and dismemberment. Yale J Int Law 43:2, 82Google Scholar
  2. Barbosa LAA (2012) História Constitucional Brasileira: Mudança Constitucional, Autoritarismo e Democracia no Brasil Pós-1964. Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados, RomeGoogle Scholar
  3. Benvindo JZ (2016) Preservationist Constitutional Amendments and the Rise of Antipolitics in Brazil. Int J Const L Blog. http://www.iconnectblog.com/2016/10/preservationist-constitutional-amendments-and-the-ris-of-antipolitics-in-brazil/. 26 Oct 2016
  4. Benvindo JZ (2017) The forgotten people in Brazilian constitutionalism: revisiting behavior strategic analyses of regime transitions. Int J Const Law 15:332–357Google Scholar
  5. Benvindo JZ (2018) Constitutional moments and constitutional thresholds in Brazil: mass protests and the “Performative Meaning” of constitutionalism. In: Albert R, Bernal C, Benvindo J (eds) Constitutional Change and Transformation in Latin America. HartGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernal C (2013) Unconstitutional constitutional amendments in the case study of Colombia: an analysis of the justification and meaning of the constitutional replacement doctrine. Int J Const Law 11:339, 340Google Scholar
  7. Brandão R (2007) Direitos Fundamentais, Cláusulas Pétreas e Democracia: Uma Proposta de Justificação e de Aplicação do art. 60, §4º, IV da CF/88. Revista Eletrônica de Direito do Estado (REDE), Salvador, Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Público 1:9Google Scholar
  8. Brandão R (2010) A Proteção dos “Direitos e Garantias Individuais” em face de Emendas Constitucionais à luz da Jurisprudência do STF. Revista Carioca de Direito 1:134–135Google Scholar
  9. Chilcote RH et al (2015) Transitions from dictatorship to democracy: comparative studies of Spain, Portugal and Greece. Routledge, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa AA, Benvindo JZ (2014) A Quem Interessa o Controle de Constitucionalidade? O Descompasso entre a Teoria e a Prática na Defesa dos Direitos Fundamentais. Soc Sci Res Netw. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2509541
  11. Da Silva VA (2004) A fossilised constitution. Ratio Juris 17:454, 459Google Scholar
  12. De Castro MF (2016) A PEC 241 e os Juristas Direito-Economia-Sociedade. Economia Legal. https://economialegal.wordpress.com/2016/10/12/a-pec-241-e-os-juristas/. 12 Oct 2016
  13. Dixon R, Landau D (2015) Transnational constitutionalism and a limited doctrine of unconstitutional constitutional amendment. Int J Const Law 13: 606, 620Google Scholar
  14. Espinosa MJC, Landau D (2017) Colombian constitutional law, vol 1. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferreira Filho MG (1976) A Democracia Possível. Saraiva, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferreira Filho MG (1985) Nova Perspectiva do Processo Constitucional. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos 60/61:129–145Google Scholar
  17. Ferreira Filho MG (1995) Significação e Alcance das “Cláusulas Pétreas”. Revista de Direito Administrativo 202:11Google Scholar
  18. Ginsburg T, Melton J (2015) Does the constitutional amendment rule matter at all? Amendment cultures and the challenges of measuring amendment difficulty. Int J Const Law 13:686, 689Google Scholar
  19. Helmke G, Ríos-Figueroa J (2011) Introduction: courts in Latin America. In: Helmke G, Ríos-Figueroa J (eds) Courts in Latin America, vol 21. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Hirschl R (2014) Comparative matters: the renaissance of comparative constitutional law, vol 4. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Holmes S (1988) Precommitment and the paradox of democracy. In: Elster J, Slagstad R (eds) Constitutionalism and democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 199–221Google Scholar
  22. Horta RM (2010) Direito Constitucional. Del ReyGoogle Scholar
  23. Koerner A (2013) Ativismo Judicial? Jurisprudência Constitucional e Política no STF Pós-88. Novos Estudos CEBRAP 96:69–85Google Scholar
  24. Mendes CH (2005) Judicial review of constitutional amendments in the Brazilian supreme court. Florida J Int Law 17:449, 461Google Scholar
  25. Miranda J (2002) Teoria do Estado e da Constituição. Forense, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  26. Negretto G (2012) Replacing and amending constitutions: the logic of constitutional change in Latin America. Law Soc Rev 45:749, 752–753Google Scholar
  27. Nolte D (2008) Constitutional change in Latin America: power politics or symbolic politics? In: ECPR Joint Sessions, Rennes, France, vol 7Google Scholar
  28. Nolte D, Schilling-Vacaflor A (2012) ‘Introduction: The Times they are a Changing’: constitutional transformations in Latin America since the 1990s. In: Schilling-Vacaflor A, Nolte D (eds) New constitutionalism in Latin America promises and practices, vol 8. Routledge, UKGoogle Scholar
  29. Paixão C (2014) Autonomia, Democracia e Poder Constituinte: Disputas Conceituais na Experiência Constitucional Brasileira (1964–2014). Quad Fiorentini 43:415Google Scholar
  30. Paixão C (2015) Past and future of authoritarian regimes: constitution, transition to democracy and amnesty in Brazil and Chile. J Const Hist 30:89–105Google Scholar
  31. Paixão C et al (2013) Constituinte Exclusiva: Inconstitucional e Ilegítima. Consultor Jurídico. http://www.conjur.com.br/2013-jun-27/proposta-constituinte-exclusiva-inconstitucional-ilegitima?imprimir=1. 27 June 2013
  32. Pou-Giménez F, Pozas-Loyo A (2018) The paradox of Mexican constitutional hyper-reformism: enabling peaceful transition while blocking democratic consolidation. In: Albert R, Bernal C, Benvindo J (eds) Constitutional change and transformation in Latin America (Hart, forthcoming)Google Scholar
  33. Ramirez-Cleves GA (2016) The unconstitutionality of constitutional amendments in Colombia: the tension between majoritarian democracy and constitutional democracy. In: Bustamante T, Fernandes Gonçalves B (eds) Democratizing constitutional law. Law and philosophy. Springer, Berlin, p 213Google Scholar
  34. Roznai Y (2017) Unconstitutional constitutional amendments. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. Sampaio NS (1995) O Poder de Reforma Constitucional. Nova Alvorada, pp 95–108Google Scholar
  36. Sarlet IW (2003) Os Direitos Fundamentais Sociais como “Cláusulas Pétreas”. Cadernos de Direito 3:78–97Google Scholar
  37. Sarria MC (2016) The unconstitutional constitutional amendment doctrine and the reform of the judiciary in Colombia. Int J Const L Blog. http://www.iconnectblog.com/2016/09/the-unconstitutional-constitutional-amendment-doctrine-and-the-reform-of-the-judiciary-in-colombia/. 1 Sept 2016
  38. Silva GJC (2000) Os Limites da Reforma Constitucional. Renovar, Mumbai, p 124Google Scholar
  39. Silva JA (2005) Curso de Direito Constitucional Positivo. Malheiros, p 68Google Scholar
  40. Tushnet M (2003) Alternative forms of judicial review. Mich Law Rev 101:2781–2782Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BrasíliaBrasíliaBrazil

Personalised recommendations