Advertisement

Debating Unamendability: Deadlock in Turkey’s Constitution-Making Process

  • Oya YegenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (IUSGENT, volume 68)

Abstract

Constitutional Conciliation Commission (Anayasa Uzlaşma Komisyonu—AUK) of Turkey, established after the 2011 general elections but called off after the commission could not overcome an impasse on a number of issues, was nevertheless a significant experience in Turkey’s constitutional development. One of the issues that led to the deadlock in the commission was the controversy over unamendable articles. A point of divide among the four parties that made up the commission was whether the new constitution would maintain the eternal clauses of the present constitution that entrench the republic form of the state, its characteristics, and its language or whether it would not include any irrevocable articles. Except the republic’s first constitution of 1921, the three constitutions of modern Turkey included unamendable constitutional provisions, which had previously led to political and constitutional controversies. The subject of unamendable articles was one of the last issues that the commission discussed before the 25 months of enterprise was dissolved. This article traces the evolution of unamendable articles in Turkish constitutions, examines the political parties’ proposals for the draft constitution and analyzes the debates conducted within AUK. It concludes that members of the AUK held irreconcilable positions with respect to unamendability and unamendable articles, which contributed to the breakdown of the negotiations.

References

  1. Albert R (2010) Constitutional handcuffs. Ariz St L 42:664, 667Google Scholar
  2. Albert R (2015) Amending constitutional amendment rules. Int J Const Law 13:7, 8Google Scholar
  3. Arato A (2010a) Democratic constitution-making and unfreezing the Turkish process. J Philos Soc Crit 36:476Google Scholar
  4. Arato A (2010b) The constitutional reform proposal of the Turkish Government: the return of majority imposition. Constellations 17:345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arato A, Tombus E (2013) Learning from success, learning from failure: South Africa, Hungary, Turkey and Egypt. J Philos Soc Crit 39:427–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atikcan EO, Öge K (2012) Referendum campaigns in polarized societies: the case of Turkey. Turk Stud 13:449–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baburoglu ON, Göker GZ (2014) Going large scale: the polling conference process for participatory constitution making in Turkey. Act Res 12:374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barın T (2014) Türkiye’nin Yeni Anayasa Arayışı: 2011–2013 TBMM Anayasa Uzlaşma Komisyonu Tecrübesi, 1st edn. On İki Levha Yayıncılık, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  9. Belge C (2006) Friends of the court: The Republican Alliance and selective activism of the constitutional court of Turkey. Law Soc Rev 40:653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bozkurt G (2012) Turkish PM’s sincerity test in the new constitution. Hürriyet Daily News, http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkish-pms-sincerity-test-in-the-new-constitution.aspx?pageID=238&nID=16853&NewsCatID=342. Accessed on 26 Mar 2012
  11. Buquicchio (2010) Keynote speech: democratization process in Turkey in light of the new constitution, ‘Turkey in Europe’ Conference, Istanbul November 2010. http://www.venice.coe.int/Newsletter/NEWSLETTER_2010_04/8_Speech_TUR_EN.html
  12. Cengiz F (2014) The future of democratic reform in Turkey: constitutional moment or constitutional process? Gov Oppos 49:682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cengiz F, Hoffmann L (2012) The 2011 general elections in Turkey: potential implications on domestic and international politics in the shadow of a discourse change? Parliam Aff 65:255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coşkun V (2013) Constitutional amendments under the justice and development party rule. Insight Turk 15:95Google Scholar
  15. Doğanay U (2007) The Turkish parliament on democracy. Parliam Aff 60:388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elster J (2006) Legislatures as constituent assemblies. In: Bauman RW, Kahana T (eds) The least examined branch: the role of legislatures in the constitutional state. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Erdem FH, Heper Y (2011) Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasaları ve Anayasa Önerileri (Madde Karşılaştırmalı), 1st edn. SETA Yayınları XV, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  18. Ginsburg T, Elkins Z, Blount J (2009) Does the process of constitution-making matter? Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 5:201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gönenç L (2004) The 2001 amendments to the 1982 Constitution of Turkey. Ankara L Rev 1:89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gözler K (2008) Judicial review of constitutional amendments: a comparative study. Ekin Press, BursaGoogle Scholar
  21. Göztepe E, Çelebi A (2012) Demokratik Anayasa: Görüşler ve Öneriler, 1st edn. Metis, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  22. Hayatsever H (2012) Panel for new charter starts landmark duty in Turkey. Hürriyet Daily News, http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/panel-for-new-charter-starts-landmark-duty-in-turkey.aspx?pageID=238&nid=19568. Accessed on 30 Apr 2012
  23. Hein M (2015) Eternity clauses: never say never. Katapult Cartography and Social Science Magazine (2015). http://katapult-magazin.de/en/artikel/article-katapult/fulltext/never-say-never/. Accessed on 4 May 2015
  24. Kalaycıoğlu E (2011) The Turkish–EU Odyssey and political regime change in Turkey. S Eur Soc Polit 16:265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kentel F, Köker L, Genç O (2012) Making of a new constitution in Turkey: Monitoring Report October 2011–January 2012. TESEV, http://tesev.org.tr/Upload/Publication/f100d8f6-928b-4c32-8a1a-428305e0755e/12366ENGanayasaizleme1_10_07_12.pdf. Accessed on 29 Feb 2012
  26. Keyman F (2012) Turkey’s new constitution: transformation, democratization, and living together. E-International Relations. http://ipc.sabanciuniv.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/TurkeysNewConstitution_TransformationDemocratizationandLivingTogether1.pdf. Accessed on 25 July 2012
  27. Köybaşı S (2013) Anayasalarda Değişmez Maddelerin Teorisi ve Pratiği. DPhil thesis, Galatasaray Universitesi, December 2013, pp 334–335Google Scholar
  28. Mumcu O (2013) Anayasa Uzlaşma Komisyonu: Kısa bir değerlendirme notu. TEPAV http://www.tepav.org.tr/tr/blog/s/3717#_ftn2. Accessed on 9 Jan 2013
  29. Oder BE (2012) Turkish constitutional transformation and the EU: Europeanisation towards constitutionalism? In: Nas C, Özer Y (eds) Turkey and the European Union, process of Europeanisation. Ashgate, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  30. Oder BE (2014) The much-awaited and deeply controversial constitutional process: learning from Turkey’s failed process. In 2013 Conference Notifications “Themes of conflict in Middle Eastern democracies: a comparative perspective from Turkey and Israel” 2014. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung & The Van Leer Jerusalem Institute & Kadir Has University Middle East and Africa Research Center, December 2014, Istanbul, 136Google Scholar
  31. Onar E (1993) 1982 Anayasasında Anayasayı Değiştirme Sorunu. Ankara Üniversitesi, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  32. Özbudun E (1993–2004) Democratization reforms in Turkey. Turk Stud 8:179Google Scholar
  33. Özbudun E (2005) Constitutional law. In: Ansay T, Wallace D (eds) Introduction to Turkish law, 2nd edn. Kluwer Law International, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  34. Özbudun E (2008a) Reasoning for headscarf decision: new constitution is now a must. Today’s Zaman, 16 November 2008Google Scholar
  35. Özbudun E (2008b) AYM’nin 5.6.2008 tarih, 2008/16 esas, 2008/116 karar sayılı iptal gerekçesi üzerine değerlendirme. Milliyet Blog. http://blog.milliyet.com.tr/aym-nin-5-6-2008-tarih--2008-16-esas--2008-116-karar-sayili-iptal-gerekcesi-uzerine-degerlendirme/Blog/?BlogNo=139547. Accessed on 22 Oct 2008
  36. Özbudun E (2009) Judicial review of constitutional amendments in Turkey. Eur Pub L 15:533Google Scholar
  37. Özbudun E (2012) Turkey’s search for a new constitution. Insight Turk 14:39Google Scholar
  38. Özbudun E (2014) Türkiye’de Demokratikleşme Süreci Anayasa Yapımı ve Anayasa Yargısı. Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  39. Özbudun E, Gençkaya OF (2009) Democratization and the politics of constitution-making in Turkey, 1st edn. Central European University Press, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  40. Özpek BB (2012) Constitution-making in Turkey after the 2011 elections. Turk Stud 13:153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roznai Y, Yolcu S (2012) An unconstitutional constitutional amendment. The Turkish perspective: a comment on the Turkish constitutional court’s headscarf decision. Int J Const Law 10:175Google Scholar
  42. Sevinç M (2012) Anayasaların doğumu: TBMM yeni bir anayasa yapabilir mi? Toplum ve Bilim 123:10Google Scholar
  43. Tanör B (2012) İki Anayasa 1961–1982, 4th edn, vol 12. Levha, p. 168Google Scholar
  44. Uçum M, Genç O (October 2012) Yeni Anayasa Sürecini İzleme Raporu Şubat 2012-Haziran 2012. TESEV, http://tesev.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Yeni_Anayasa_Surecini_Izleme_Raporu_2_Subat_Haziran_2012.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2015
  45. Uran P (2010) Turkey’s hasty constitutional amendment devoid of rational basis: from a political crisis to a governmental system change. J Polit Law 3:2Google Scholar
  46. Yayla Y (1983) 1982 Anayasasına Göre Devletin Özü. Idare Hukuku ve Ilimleri Dergisi 1:133Google Scholar
  47. Yazıcı S (2001) Yeni Bir Anayasa Hazırlığı ve Türkiye: Seçkinlikten Toplum Sözleşmesine, 2nd edn. Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  48. Yüksel S (2007) Constitutional changes of Turkey in 2001 under the framework of the EU adaptation process. Annales XXXIX 56:153Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sabancı UnversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations