Skip to main content

Multisensory Packaging Design across Cultures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multisensory Packaging

Abstract

A major issue in designing packaging that appeals to all the senses is the question of whether marketers should adopt a pancultural or a culture-specific approach. This chapter discusses how culture impacts consumer perception, processing, and behaviour related to the design of packaging. The chapter starts with a brief discussion of cultural dynamics, after which a comprehensive review of culture-specific perception follows. Section 3 illustrates how individual and cultural differences impact consumer processing of packaging characteristics. Sections 4 and 5 highlight the interplay between packaging design and consumer behaviour and outline avenues for future research. In so doing, we provide academics with a state-of-the-art overview of cultural aspects of multisensory packaging, alert practitioners to the possibility of tailoring their packaging to particular cultural groups, and illustrate possible applications using actual brands and examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. (2001). “I” seek pleasures and “we” avoid pains: The role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, D., & Tellis, G. (2001). Can culture affect prices? A cross-cultural study of shopping and retail prices. Journal of Retailing, 77(1), 57–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ares, G. (2018). Methodological issues in cross-cultural sensory and consumer research. Food Quality and Preference, 64, 253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayabe-Kanamura, S., Schicker, I., Laska, M., Hudson, R., Distel, H., Kobayakawa, T., & Saito, S. (1998). Differences in perception of everyday odors: A Japanese-German cross-cultural study. Chemical Senses, 23(1), 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J. A. (2016). Multicultural education: Characteristics and goals. In J. A. Banks & C. A. McGee-Banks (Eds.), Multicultural issues and perspectives (pp. 2–24). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basso, F., Robert-Demontrond, P., Hayek, M., Anton, J.-L., Nazarian, B., Roth, M., & Oullier, O. (2014). Why people drink shampoo? Food imitating products are fooling brains and endangering consumers for marketing purposes. PLoS One, 9(9), e100368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, H., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. (2001). Response styles in marketing research: A cross-national investigation. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W. (1991). Cultural variations in field dependence-independence. In S. Wapner & J. Demick (Eds.), Field dependence-independence: Cognitive style across the life span (pp. 289–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremner, A., Caparos, S., Davidoff, J., de Fockert, J., Linnell, K., & Spence, C. (2013). Bouba and Kiki in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape-sound matches, but different shape-taste matches to Westerners. Cognition, 126, 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo, E., Fiszman, S., Lähteenmäki, L., & Varela, P. (2014). Consumers’ perception of symbols and health claims as health-related label messages. A cross-cultural study. Food Research International, 62, 653–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallo, C., & Piqueras-Fiszman, B. (2017). Visual elements of packaging shaping healthiness evaluations of consumers: The case of olive oil. Journal of Sensory Studies, 32, e12246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celhay, F., & Trinquecoste, J. F. (2015). Package graphic design: Investigating the variables that moderate consumer response to atypical designs. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 1014–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra Lal, R., Yambrach, F., & McProud, L. (2015). Consumer perceptions towards package designs: A cross cultural study. Journal of Applied Packaging Research, 7(2), 61–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattaraman, V., Rudd, N. A., & Lennon, S. J. (2010). The malleable bicultural consumer: Effects of cultural contexts on aesthetic judgments. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(1), 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavan, A. L., Gorney, D., Prabhu, B., & Arora, S. (2009). The washing machine that ate my sari—Mistakes in cross-cultural design. Interactions, 16(1), 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-C., Huang, P. C., Woods, A., & Spence, C. (2016). When “Bouba” equals “Kiki”: Cultural commonalities and cultural differences in sound-shape correspondences. Scientific Reports, 6, 26681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrea, C., Valentin, D., Sulmont-RossĂ©, C., Mai, H. L., Nguyen, D. H., & Abdi, H. (2004). Culture and odor categorization: Agreement between cultures depends upon the odors. Food Quality and Preference, 15(7), 669–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chryssochoidis, G., Krystallis, A., & Perreas, P. (2007). Ethnocentric beliefs and country-of-origin (COO) effect: Impact of country, product and product attributes on Greek consumers’ evaluation of food products. European Journal of Marketing, 41(11/12), 1518–1544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Classen, C. (1999). Other ways to wisdom: Learning through the senses across cultures. International Review of Education, 45(3–4), 269–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmet, P., & Schifferstein, H. (2012). Emotion research as input for product design. In J. Beckley, D. Paredes, & K. Lopetcharats (Eds.), Product innovation toolbox: A field guide to consumer understanding and research (pp. 149–175). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Mooij, M. K. (2013). Global marketing and advertising: Understanding cultural paradoxes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications..

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibiase, R., & Gunnoe, J. (2004). Gender and culture differences in touching behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(1), 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkes, V., & Matta, S. (2004). The effect of package shape on consumers’ judgments of product volume: Attention as a mental contaminant. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 390–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foscht, T., Maloles, C., III, Swoboda, B., Morschett, D., & Sinha, I. (2008). The impact of culture on brand perceptions: A six-nation study. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 17(3), 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foxman, E. R., Muehling, D. D., & Berger, P. W. (1990). An investigation of factors contributing to consumer brand confusion. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 24(1), 170–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, J. N., Lam, J. P., & Walls, J. (2002). The impact of linguistic differences on international brand name standardization: A comparison of English and Chinese brand names of Fortune-500 companies. Journal of International Marketing, 10(1), 98–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatti, E., Bordegoni, M., & Spence, C. (2014). Investigating the influence of colour, weight, and fragrance intensity on the perception of liquid bath soap: An experimental study. Food Quality and Preference, 31, 56–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerpott, T. J., & Bicak, I. (2011). Ethno-Marketing: Synopse empirischer Studien sowie Schlussfolgerungen fĂĽr die Marketing-Praxis und-Forschung [Ethnic marketing: A review of empirical studies and conclusions for marketing practice and science]. Der Markt, 50(2), 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, P., Werle, C. O., & Corneille, O. (2017). The pitfall of nutrition facts label fluency: Easier-to-process nutrition information enhances purchase intentions for unhealthy food products. Marketing Letters, 28(1), 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GĂĽrhan-Canli, Z., & Maheswaran, D. (2000). Cultural variations in country of origin effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(3), 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberstroh, K., Orth U. R., Bouzdine-Chameeva, T., Cohen J., Corsi, A., Crouch, R., & De Marchi, R. (2018). Through the lens of self-construal: Cross-cultural variation in consumers’ appreciation of harmony in marketing visuals. International Marketing Review, 35(3), 429–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T. (1985). Hidden differences: Studies in international communication. Hamburg: Grunder and Jahr..

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2012). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Publications..

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertenstein, M. J., Verkamp, J. M., Kerestes, A. M., & Holmes, R. M. (2006). The communicative functions of touch in humans, nonhuman primates, and rats: A review and synthesis of the empirical research. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(1), 5–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 9(1), 42–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, D. A. (2007). Reconceptualizing cultural identity and its role in intercultural business communication. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 44(3), 199–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahle, L. R., Rose, G., & Shoham, A. (2000). Findings of LOV throughout the world, and other evidence of cross-national consumer psychographics: Introduction. Journal of Euromarketing, 8(1–2), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnal, N., Machiels, C. J. A., Orth, U. R., & Mai, R. (2016). Healthy by design, but only when in focus: Communicating non-verbal health cues through symbolic meaning in packaging. Food Quality and Preference, 52, 106–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klink, R. R. (2000). Creating brand names with meaning: The use of sound symbolism. Marketing Letters, 11(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knöferle, K. M., Woods, A., Käppler, F., & Spence, C. (2015). That sounds sweet: Using cross-modal correspondences to communicate gustatory attributes. Psychology & Marketing, 32(1), 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, A., Elder, R. S., & Caldara, C. (2010). Feminine to smell but masculine to touch? Multisensory congruence and its effect on the aesthetic experience. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(4), 410–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, A., Lwin, M. O., & Morrin, M. (2009). Product scent and memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(1), 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Papers. Peabody Museum of Archaeology & Ethnology, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehnl, C., & Mantau, A. (2013). Same sound, same preference? Investigating sound symbolism effects in international brand names. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30(4), 417–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KĂĽhnen, U., Hannover, B., Roeder, U., Shah, A. A., Schubert, B., Upmeyer, A., & Zakaria, S. (2001). Cross-cultural variations in identifying embedded figures: Comparisons from the United States, Germany, Russia, and Malaysia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(3), 366–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labbe, D., Pineau, N., & Martin, N. (2013). Food expected naturalness: Impact of visual, tactile and auditory packaging material properties and role of perceptual interactions. Food Quality and Preference, 27(2), 170–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labbrand. (2009). Brand translation: Packaging design differences. LABReport, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.labbrand.com/brandsource/issue/labreport-vol-2-iss-1-mar-2009

  • Lao, J., Vizioli, L., & Caldara, R. (2013). Culture modulates the temporal dynamics of global/local processing. Culture and Brain, 1(2–4), 158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. S., & Lopetcharat, K. (2017). Effect of culture on sensory and consumer research: Asian perspectives. Current Opinion in Food Science, 15, 22–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenartowicz, T., & Roth, K. (2001). Does subculture within a country matter? A cross-cultural study of motivational domains and business performance in Brazil. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(2), 305–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limon, Y., Kahle, L. R., & Orth, U. R. (2009). Package design as a communications vehicle in cross-cultural values shopping. Journal of International Marketing, 17(1), 30–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, R. (1945). The cultural background of personality. New York, NY: Appleton-Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, F., Murphy, J., Li, J., & Liu, X. (2006). English and Chinese? The role of consumer ethnocentrism and country of origin in Chinese attitudes towards store signs. Australasian Marketing Journal, 14(2), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lwin, M. O., & Wijaya, M. (2009). Do scents evoke the same feelings across cultures? Exploring the role of emotions. In A. Krishna (Ed.), Sensory marketing: Research on the sensuality of products (pp. 109–122). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiels, C. J. A., & Karnal, N. (2016). See how tasty it is? Effects of symbolic cues on product evaluation and taste. Food Quality and Preference, 52, 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machiels, C. J. A., & Orth, U. R. (2017). Verticality in product labels and shelves as a metaphorical cue to quality. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 37, 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, T. J., Hewett, K., & Roth, M. (2000). Managing images in different cultures: A cross-national study of color meanings and preferences. Journal of International Marketing, 8, 90–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madzharov, A. V., & Block, L. G. (2010). Effects of product unit image on consumption of snack foods. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(4), 398–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mai, R., Symmank, C., & Seeberg-Elverfeldt, B. (2016). Light and pale colors in food packaging: When does this package cue signal superior healthiness or inferior tastiness? Journal of Retailing, 92(4), 426–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majid, A., & Burenhult, N. (2014). Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition, 130(2), 266–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majid, A., & Kruspe, N. (2018). Hunter-gatherer olfaction is special. Current Biology, 28(3), 409–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masuda, T. (2017). Culture and attention: Recent empirical findings and new directions in cultural psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(12), e12363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., & Nakagawa, S. (2008). Culture, emotion regulation, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 925–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCort, D. J., & Malhotra, N. K. (1993). Culture and consumer behavior: Toward an understanding of cross-cultural consumer behavior in international marketing. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 6(2), 91–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesquita, B. (2001). Emotions in collectivist and individualist contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesquita, B., & Leu, J. (2007). The cultural psychology of emotion. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 734–759). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto, Y., Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2006). Culture and the physical environment: Holistic versus analytic perceptual affordances. Psychological Science, 17(2), 113–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, H., Miller, D. R., & Kim, S. H. (2013). Product design innovation and customer value: Cross-cultural research in the United States and Korea. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(1), 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, S., & Houston, M. J. (2006). Exemplars or beliefs? The impact of self-view on the nature and relative influence of brand associations. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4), 519–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, M. K., Velasco, C., Salgado, A., Boehm, E., O’Neill, D., & Spence, C. (2013). Assessing crossmodal correspondences in exotic fruit juices: The case of shape and sound symbolism. Food Quality and Preference, 28(1), 361–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nibbe, N., & Orth, U. R. (2017). Odor in marketing. In A. BĂĽttner (Ed.), Springer handbook of odor (pp. 1053–1068). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. (2004). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently… and why. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 467–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N., & Simonson, I. (2007). Preference fluency in choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orth, U. R., Campana, D., & Malkewitz, K. (2010). Formation of consumer price expectation based on package design: Attractive and quality routes. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 18(1), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orth, U. R., & Crouch, R. C. (2014). Is beauty in the aisles of the retailer? Package processing in visually complex contexts. Journal of Retailing, 90(4), 524–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orth, U. R., & Firbasová, Z. (2003). The role of consumer ethnocentrism in food product evaluation. Agribusiness, 19(2), 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orth, U. R., & Gal, S. (2014). Persuasive mechanisms of nostalgic brand packages. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(2), 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orth, U. R., & Malkewitz, K. (2008). Holistic package design and consumer brand impressions. Journal of Marketing, 72(3), 64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orth, U. R., & Malkewitz, K. (2012). The accuracy of design-based judgments: A constructivist approach. Journal of Retailing, 88(3), 421–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2003). Individual differences in haptic information processing: The “need for touch” scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 430–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2008). Sensory factors and consumer behavior. In C. P. Haugtvedt, P. M. Herr, & F. R. Kardes (Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 193–219). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piqueras-Fiszman, B., & Spence, C. (2012a). The weight of the bottle as a possible extrinsic cue with which to estimate the price (and quality) of the wine? Observed correlations. Food Quality and Preference, 25(1), 41–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piqueras-Fiszman, B., & Spence, C. (2012b). The influence of the feel of product packaging on the perception of the oral-somatosensory texture of food. Food Quality and Preference, 26(1), 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittard, N., Ewing, M., & Jevons, C. (2007). Aesthetic theory and logo design: Examining consumer response to proportion across cultures. International Marketing Review, 24(4), 457–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reber, R., Wurtz, P., & Zimmermann, T. D. (2004). Exploring “fringe” consciousness: The subjective experience of perceptual fluency and its objective bases. Consciousness and Cognition, 13(1), 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redies, C. (2015). Combining universal beauty and cultural context in a unifying model of visual aesthetic experience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiling, L. G. (1982). Consumer misuse mars sampling for Sunlight dishwasher liquid. Marketing News, 16(5), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, M., Zaichkowsky, J., Neuhaus, C., Bender, T., & Weber, B. (2010). Aesthetic package design: A behavioral, neural, and psychological investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(4), 431–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohner, R. P. (1984). Toward a conception of culture for cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15(2), 111–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. M., Merchant, A., Orth, U. R., & Horstmann, F. (2016). Emphasizing brand heritage: Does it work? And how. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 936–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, B. H., Pan, Y., & Tavassoli, N. T. (1994). Language and consumer memory: The impact of linguistic differences between Chinese and English. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 419–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, C. N., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2004). Emotions across cultures and methods. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(3), 304–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., Shimp, T. A., & Shin, J. (1995). Consumer ethnocentrism: A test of antecedents and moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(1), 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrum, L. J., Lowrey, T. M., Luna, D., Lerman, D. B., & Liu, M. (2012). Sound symbolism effects across languages: Implications for global brand names. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(3), 275–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siamagka, N. T., & Balabanis, G. (2015). Revisiting consumer ethnocentrism: Review, reconceptualization, and empirical testing. Journal of International Marketing, 23(3), 66–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S., & Yani-de-Soriano, M. (2010). Researching consumers in multicultural societies: Emerging methodological issues. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(11–12), 1143–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares, A. M., Farhangmehr, M., & Shoham, A. (2007). Hofstede’s dimensions of culture in international marketing studies. Journal of Business Research, 60(3), 277–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sojka, J., & Tansuhaj, P. S. (1995). Cross-cultural consumer research: A twenty-year review. Advances in Consumer Research, 22(1), 461–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, C. (2012). Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: Capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, C. (2015). Leading the consumer by the nose: On the commercialization of olfactory-design for the food and beverage sector. Flavour, 4, 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, C., & Gallace, A. (2011). Multisensory design: Reaching out to touch the consumer. Psychology & Marketing, 28(3), 267–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, C., & Wang, Q. J. (2015). Sensory expectations elicited by the sounds of opening the packaging and pouring a beverage. Flavour, 4(1), 35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, C., & Wang, Q. J. (2017). Assessing the impact of closure type on wine ratings and mood. Beverages, 3, 52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J. B. E. (2001). The role of national culture in international marketing research. International Marketing Review, 18(1), 30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundar, A., & Noseworthy, T. J. (2014). Place the logo high or low? Using conceptual metaphors of power in packaging design. Journal of Marketing, 78(5), 138–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tharp, M. C. (2001). Marketing and consumer identity in multicultural America. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, S. J., Sears, C. R., & Pexman, P. M. (2005). Cultural influences on categorization processes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(6), 662–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usunier, J.-C., & Lee, J. A. (2013). Marketing across cultures. Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg-Weitzel, L., & van de Laar, G. (2001). Relation between culture and communication in packaging design. The Journal of Brand Management, 8(3), 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Lans, R., Cote, J. A., Cole, C. A., Leong, S. M., Smidts, A., Henderson, P. W., & Moorthy, J. (2009). Cross-national logo evaluation analysis: An individual-level approach. Marketing Science, 28(5), 968–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Rompay, T. J. L., Hekkert, P., Saakes, D., & Russo, B. (2005). Grounding abstract object characteristics in embodied interactions. Acta Psychologica, 119(3), 315–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasco, C., Wan, X., Salgado-Montejo, A., Woods, A., Oñate, G. A., Mu, B., & Spence, C. (2014). The context of colour–flavour associations in crisps packaging: A cross-cultural study comparing Chinese, Colombian, and British consumers. Food Quality and Preference, 38, 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasco, C., Woods, A. T., Petit, O., Cheok, A. D., & Spence, C. (2016). Crossmodal correspondences between taste and shape, and their implications for product packaging: A review. Food Quality and Preference, 52, 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, E. (2009). Packaging design: A cultural sign. Barcelona: Index Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, X., Woods, A. T., van den Bosch, J. J., McKenzie, K. J., Velasco, C., & Spence, C. (2014). Cross-cultural differences in crossmodal correspondences between basic tastes and visual features. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wines, M. (2011). Picking brand names in China is a business itself. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/12/world/asia/picking-brand-names-in-china-is-a-business-itself.html

  • Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 989–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S., & Raghubir, P. (2005). Can bottles speak volumes? The effect of package shape on how much to buy. Journal of Retailing, 81(4), 269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. (2008). Packaging and the environment: A cross-cultural perspective. Design Management Review, 19(4), 42–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zikmund, W., & Babin, B. (2007). Exploring marketing research. Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Casparus J. A. Machiels .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Machiels, C.J.A., Orth, U.R. (2019). Multisensory Packaging Design across Cultures. In: Velasco, C., Spence, C. (eds) Multisensory Packaging. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94977-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics