Skip to main content

Locality Sensitive Imputation for Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Bioinformatics Research and Applications (ISBRA 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNBI,volume 10847))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

One of the most notable challenges in single cell RNA-Seq data analysis is the so called drop-out effect, where only a fraction of the transcriptome of each cell is captured. The random nature of drop-outs, however, makes it possible to consider imputation methods as means of correcting for drop-outs. In this paper we study some existing scRNA-Seq imputation methods and propose a novel iterative imputation approach based on efficiently computing highly similar cells. We then present the results of a comprehensive assessment of existing and proposed methods on real scRNA-Seq datasets with varying per cell sequencing depth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that, unlike KNN, which uses similarity between genes, LSImpute uses similarity between cells. Also, the number of nearest cells used for imputation is not fixed but depends on the minimum similarity threshold.

References

  1. Azizi, E., Prabhakaran, S., Carr, A., Pe’er, D.: Bayesian inference for single-cell clustering and imputing. Genomics Comput. Biol. 3(1), 46 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Duan, F., Duitama, J., Al Seesi, S., Ayres, C.M., Corcelli, S.A., Pawashe, A.P., Blanchard, T., McMahon, D., Sidney, J., Sette, A., et al.: Genomic and bioinformatic profiling of mutational neoepitopes reveals new rules to predict anticancer immunogenicity. J. Exp. Med. 211(11), 2231–2248 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hornik, K., Feinerer, I., Kober, M., Buchta, C.: Spherical k-means clustering. J. Stat. Softw. 50(10), 1–22 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kwak, I.Y., Gong, W., Koyano-Nakagawa, N., Garry, D.: DrImpute: imputing dropout events in single cell RNA sequencing data. bioRxiv, p. 181479 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, C., Măndoiu, I.I., Nelson, C.E.: Inferring ethnicity from mitochondrial DNA sequence. In: BMC Proceedings, vol. 5, p. S11. BioMed Central (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leskovec, J., Rajaraman, A., Ullman, J.D.: Mining of Massive Datasets. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, C.L., Li, K.C., Wu, D., Chen, Y., Luo, H., Zhao, J.R., Wang, S.S., Sun, M.M., Lu, Y.J., Zhong, Y.Q., et al.: Somatosensory neuron types identified by high-coverage single-cell rna-sequencing and functional heterogeneity. Cell Res. 26(1), 83 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, W.V., Li, J.J.: scImpute: accurate and robust imputation for single cell RNA-seq data. bioRxiv, p. 141598 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lin, P., Troup, M., Ho, J.W.: CIDR: ultrafast and accurate clustering through imputation for single-cell RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 18(1), 59 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mandric, I., Temate-Tiagueu, Y., Shcheglova, T., Al Seesi, S., Zelikovsky, A., Măndoiu, I.I.: Fast bootstrapping-based estimation of confidence intervals of expression levels and differential expression from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics 33(20), 3302–3304 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moussa, M., Mandoiu, I.: Single cell RNA-seq data clustering using TF-IDF based methods. BMC-Genomics (2018, to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nicolae, M., Mangul, S., Mandoiu, I.I., Zelikovsky, A.: Estimation of alternative splicing isoform frequencies from RNA-seq data. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 6(1), 9 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Prabhakaran, S., Azizi, E., Carr, A., Peer, D.: Dirichlet process mixture model for correcting technical variation in single-cell gene expression data. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1070–1079 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Satija, R., Farrell, J.A., Gennert, D., Schier, A.F., Regev, A.: Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat. Biotechnol. 33(5), 495 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Selivanov, D.: dselivanov/LSHR. https://github.com/dselivanov/LSHR

  16. Troyanskaya, O., Cantor, M., Sherlock, G., Brown, P., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Botstein, D., Altman, R.B.: Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays. Bioinformatics 17(6), 520–525 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Asch, V.: Macro-and micro-averaged evaluation measures. Technical report (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marmar Moussa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Moussa, M., Măndoiu, I.I. (2018). Locality Sensitive Imputation for Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data. In: Zhang, F., Cai, Z., Skums, P., Zhang, S. (eds) Bioinformatics Research and Applications. ISBRA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10847. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94968-0_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94968-0_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94967-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94968-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics