Skip to main content

vis-UI-lise: Developing a Tool for Assessing User Interface Visibility

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Usability, User Experience and Assistive Technology (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 794))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3311 Accesses

Abstract

Visibility in user interfaces (UI) is a critical element of making a product usable. However, the visibility of modern user interfaces can be compromised in a number of distinct ways. Firstly, some user interface controls have no visible attributes at all, from a visibility perspective they are effectively ‘missing’. Secondly, if an element is present then it can be ‘missed’, thirdly, if it is seen it may be ‘misunderstood’ by the user. Previous work has seen the development of a model to represent this. This model is used to inform the development of an evaluation tool called vis-UI-lise that can be used to assess the visibility of user interfaces. It presents UI visibility as a series of 5 hurdles between the user and the interface that have to be overcome for a successful interaction. The output from this highlights to designers what the key issues are to help drive further development to improve usability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Norman, D.A., Nielsen, J.: Gestural interfaces: a step backward in usability. Interactions 17, 46–49 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Norman, D.A.: Natural user interfaces are not natural. Interactions 17, 6–10 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. van Dam, A.: Post-WIMP user interfaces. Commun. ACM 40, 63–67 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. van Dam, A.: User interfaces: disappearing, dissolving, and evolving. CACM 44, 50–52 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hosking, I.M., Clarkson, P.J.: Now you see it, now you don’t: understanding user interface visibility. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) UAHCI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10279, pp. 436–445. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58700-4_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Hosking, I.M., Clarkson, P.J.: Believing is seeing: rethinking the visibility of user interfaces. Presented at the Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology, Cambridge, 9 April (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blessing, L.T.M., Chakrabarti, A.: DRM, a Design Research Methodology. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Fernandez, A., Insfran, E., Abrahão, S.: Usability evaluation methods for the web: a systematic mapping study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53, 789–817 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A.: The human information-processor. In: The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 23–100. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wickens, C.D., Hollands, J.G., Banbury, S., Parasuraman, R.: Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Annett, J., Duncan, K.D.: Task analysis and training design. Occup. Psychol. 41, 211–221 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shepherd, A.: HTA as a framework for task analysis. Ergonomics 41, 1537–1552 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Green, M., Allen, J.M., Abrams, S.B., Weintraub, L.: Forensic Vision with Application to Highway Safety. Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company, Tucson (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Persad, U., Langdon, P., Clarkson, J.: Characterising user capabilities to support inclusive design evaluation. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 6, 119–135 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nicholl, B.: Empathy as an aspect of critical thought and action in design and technology. In: Williams, P.J., Stables, K. (eds.) Critique in Design and Technology Education, pp. 153–171. Springer, Singapore (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3106-9_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Hosking .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hosking, I., Clarkson, P.J. (2019). vis-UI-lise: Developing a Tool for Assessing User Interface Visibility. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Usability, User Experience and Assistive Technology. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 794. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94947-5_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94947-5_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94946-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94947-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics