Abstract
Visibility in user interfaces (UI) is a critical element of making a product usable. However, the visibility of modern user interfaces can be compromised in a number of distinct ways. Firstly, some user interface controls have no visible attributes at all, from a visibility perspective they are effectively ‘missing’. Secondly, if an element is present then it can be ‘missed’, thirdly, if it is seen it may be ‘misunderstood’ by the user. Previous work has seen the development of a model to represent this. This model is used to inform the development of an evaluation tool called vis-UI-lise that can be used to assess the visibility of user interfaces. It presents UI visibility as a series of 5 hurdles between the user and the interface that have to be overcome for a successful interaction. The output from this highlights to designers what the key issues are to help drive further development to improve usability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Norman, D.A., Nielsen, J.: Gestural interfaces: a step backward in usability. Interactions 17, 46–49 (2010)
Norman, D.A.: Natural user interfaces are not natural. Interactions 17, 6–10 (2010)
van Dam, A.: Post-WIMP user interfaces. Commun. ACM 40, 63–67 (1997)
van Dam, A.: User interfaces: disappearing, dissolving, and evolving. CACM 44, 50–52 (2001)
Hosking, I.M., Clarkson, P.J.: Now you see it, now you don’t: understanding user interface visibility. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) UAHCI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10279, pp. 436–445. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58700-4_35
Hosking, I.M., Clarkson, P.J.: Believing is seeing: rethinking the visibility of user interfaces. Presented at the Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology, Cambridge, 9 April (2018)
Blessing, L.T.M., Chakrabarti, A.: DRM, a Design Research Methodology. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (2009)
Fernandez, A., Insfran, E., Abrahão, S.: Usability evaluation methods for the web: a systematic mapping study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53, 789–817 (2011)
Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A.: The human information-processor. In: The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 23–100. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1983)
Wickens, C.D., Hollands, J.G., Banbury, S., Parasuraman, R.: Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River (2013)
Annett, J., Duncan, K.D.: Task analysis and training design. Occup. Psychol. 41, 211–221 (1967)
Shepherd, A.: HTA as a framework for task analysis. Ergonomics 41, 1537–1552 (1998)
Green, M., Allen, J.M., Abrams, S.B., Weintraub, L.: Forensic Vision with Application to Highway Safety. Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company, Tucson (2008)
Persad, U., Langdon, P., Clarkson, J.: Characterising user capabilities to support inclusive design evaluation. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 6, 119–135 (2007)
Nicholl, B.: Empathy as an aspect of critical thought and action in design and technology. In: Williams, P.J., Stables, K. (eds.) Critique in Design and Technology Education, pp. 153–171. Springer, Singapore (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3106-9_9
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hosking, I., Clarkson, P.J. (2019). vis-UI-lise: Developing a Tool for Assessing User Interface Visibility. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Usability, User Experience and Assistive Technology. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 794. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94947-5_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94947-5_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94946-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94947-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)