Skip to main content

Organizational Capability Model for Futures Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter describes a capability maturity model for futures thinking that profiles organizations as they strive toward actualizing future success. The capability for futures thinking within an organization operates along a continuum. This continuum consists of knowledge, skills, behaviors, and attitudes related to use of foresight and futures thinking for planning and taking action. The stages along the continuum describe the level of maturity an organization exhibits for collecting and analyzing data to actualize change related to future outcomes. These efforts are not dissimilar to re-engineering processes in that there is a redefining of roles and responsibilities to facilitate teamwork, collaboration (with internal and external business partners), distributed decision making, and innovative strategies for allocation of resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abedalla, R. W. (2014). The silo effect of information technology on the organizational productivity: A qualitative research study. International Journal of Computer, 15(1), 42–50. Retrieved from: http://ijcjournal.org/index.php/InternationalJournalOfComputer/article/viewFile/320/319.

  • Akakpo, A., Gyasi, E., Oduro, B., & Akpabot, S. (2018). Foresight, organization policies and management strategies in electric vehicle technology advances at Tesla. In D. A. Schreiber & Z. L. Berge (Eds.), Futures thinking and organizational policy: Case studies for managing rapid change in technology, globalization and workforce diversity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boman, M., & Heger, T. (2018). Circles of impression: External foresight in global enterprises. In D. A. Schreiber & Z. L. Berge (Eds.), Futures thinking and organizational policy: Case studies for managing rapid change in technology, globalization and workforce diversity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookins, M. (2016). What causes resistance to change in an organization? Retrieved from: http://smallbusiness.chron.com/causes-resistance-change-organization-347.html.

  • Curtis, B., Hefley, B., & Miller, S. (2009). People capability maturity model (P-CMM). Version 2.0, Second Edition, in Technical Report CMR/SEI-2009-TR-003. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University. July. Retrieved from: ftp://ftp.cert.org/pub/documents/09.reports/09tr003.pdf.

  • Darkow, I. L. (2015). The involvement of middle management in strategy development: Development and implementation of a foresight-based approach. Technology Forecasting and Social Change,101, 10–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, P., & France, T. (2018). Accelerating diverse leader readiness through foresight and futures thinking. In D. A. Schreiber & Z. L. Berge (Eds.), Futures thinking and organizational policy: Case studies for managing rapid change in technology, globalization and workforce diversity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim, T. (2009). Foresight maturity model (FMM): Achieving best practices in the foresight field. Journal of Futures Studies,13(4), 69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L. (2018). Envisioning successful Sino-foreign universities in 2030: Consideration for current and prospective partnerships. In D. A. Schreiber & Z. L. Berge (Eds.), Futures thinking and organizational policy: Case studies for managing rapid change in technology, globalization and workforce diversity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, R. (2015). Visionary competence for long-term development of brands, products, and services: The trend receiver concept and its applications at Audi. Technology Forecasting & Social Change, 101, 83–98. Prepublication copy available at http://researchanddrawing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/tfs_trend-receiver-concept_rupert-hofmann.pdf.

  • Jahn, R., & Koller, H. (2018). Foresight as a facilitator for innovative capability and organizational adaptability: Insights from a family firm in the HVAC industry. In D. A. Schreiber & Z. L. Berge (Eds.), Futures thinking and organizational policy: Case studies for managing rapid change in technology, globalization and workforce diversity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, B. (2016, January 15). Why are so many Zappos employees leaving? The Atlantic. Retrieved from: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/01/zappos-holacracy-hierarchy/424173/.

  • Lohry, J. (2017, September 26). Advantages of clear roles and responsibilities in an organization. Retrieved from: https://bizfluent.com/info-12124590-advantages-roles-responsibilities-organization.html.

  • Montero Salvatico, Y., & Spencer IV, F. (2018). Disney’s workforce of the future: From HR initiative to organizational culture. In D. A. Schreiber & Z. L. Berge (Eds.), Futures thinking and organizational policy: Case studies for managing rapid change in technology, globalization and workforce diversity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. (2014). The future of work. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oduro, B., Akpabot, S., Akakpo, A., & Gyasi, E. A. (2018). Pledge toward workforce diversity and organizational wellbeing: A case study of Aviva Plc. In D. A. Schreiber & Z. L. Berge (Eds.), Futures thinking and organizational policy: Case studies for managing rapid change in technology, globalization and workforce diversity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulk, M., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M., & Weber, C. (1993). Capability Maturity ModelSM for software. Version 1.1, in Technical Report CMR/SEI-93-TR-024. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University. February. Retrieved from: https://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/93tr024.pdf.

  • Peter, M. (2018). The evolving approach to strategic corporate foresight at Swiss bank PostFinance in the age of digital transformation. In D. A. Schreiber & Z. L. Berge (Eds.), Futures thinking and organizational policy: Case studies for managing rapid change in technology, globalization and workforce diversity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, I., & Avi Brooks, L. (2018). Diverse alternative learning visions 2026–2066: Transforming and reframing the university as a lifelong social design lab. In D. A. Schreiber & Z. L. Berge (Eds.), Futures thinking and organizational policy: Case studies for managing rapid change in technology, globalization and workforce diversity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rishipal, Dr. (2014). Analytical comparison of flat and vertical organizational structures. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(36). Retrieved from: http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/EJBM/article/viewFile/17351/17948.

  • Rohrbeck, R. (2010). Corporate foresight: Toward a maturity model for the future orientation of a firm (pp. 71–120). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbeck, R., & Schwarz, J. (2013). The value contribution of strategic foresight: Insights from an empirical study of large European companies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,80(8), 1593–1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbeck, R., Battistella, C., & Huizingh, E. (2015, December). Corporate foresight: An emerging field with a rich tradition. Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 101. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282666273_Corporate_Foresight_An_Emerging_Field_with_a_Rich_Tradition.

  • Rostek, M. (2018). Institutionalizing futures thinking in the Canadian army. In D. A. Schreiber & Z. L. Berge (Eds.), Futures thinking and organizational policy: Case studies for managing rapid change in technology, globalization and workforce diversity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacio-Szymańska, A., & Nosarzewski, K. (2018). Anticipating and managing change in large organization strategic environment: Using foresight and organizational policy to enable futures literate decision making. In D. A. Schreiber & Z. L. Berge (Eds.), Futures thinking and organizational policy: Case studies for managing rapid change in technology, globalization and workforce diversity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, D. (1998). Organizational technology and its impact on distance training. In D. A. Schreiber & Z. L. Berge (Eds.), Distance training: How organizations are using technology to maximize learning and meet business objectives (pp. 3–18). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, D., & Berge, L. (1998). Distance training: How organizations are using technology to maximize learning and meet business objectives. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehlik, D., & Foot, J. (2018). Foresight renewal: Beginning and ending with foresight in the Florida and Ohio Army National Guard organizations. In D. A. Schreiber & Z. L. Berge (Eds.), Futures thinking and organizational policy: Case studies for managing rapid change in technology, globalization and workforce diversity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tett, G. (2016). The silo effect (pp. 91–107). New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Duin, P. (Ed.). (2016). Foresight in organizations: Methods and tools. New York, NY: Routledge Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Duin, P. & Ligtvoet, A. (2018). Defending the delta: Practices of foresight at Dutch infrastructure providers. In D. A. Schreiber & Z. L. Berge (Eds.), Futures thinking and organizational policy: Case studies for managing rapid change in technology, globalization and workforce diversity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vishnevskiy, K., Calof, J., & Meissner, D. (2018). Corporate foresight and roadmapping for innovation in Russia: A joint university corporate experience. In D. A. Schreiber & Z. L. Berge (Eds.), Futures thinking and organizational policy: Case studies for managing rapid change in technology, globalization and workforce diversity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. M. (2018). Futures thinking: Strategy used by Trust Bank to survive global economic collapse during great recession of 2008. In D. A. Schreiber & Z. L. Berge (Eds.), Futures thinking and organizational policy: Case studies for managing rapid change in technology, globalization and workforce diversity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schreiber, D.A. (2019). Organizational Capability Model for Futures Thinking. In: Schreiber, D.A., Berge, Z.L. (eds) Futures Thinking and Organizational Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94923-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics