Skip to main content

External Vehicle Interfaces for Communication with Other Road Users?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Road Vehicle Automation 5

Abstract

How to ensure trust and societal acceptance of automated vehicles (AVs) is a widely-discussed topic today. While trust and acceptance could be influenced by a range of factors, one thing is sure: the ability of AVs to safely and smoothly interact with other road users will play a key role. Based on our experiences from a series of studies, this paper elaborates on issues that AVs may face in interactions with other road users and whether external vehicle interfaces could support these interactions. Our overall conclusion is that such interfaces may be beneficial in situations where negotiation is needed. However, these benefits, and potential drawbacks, need to be further explored to create a common language, or standard, for how AVs should communicate with other road users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bainbridge L (1983) Ironies of automation. Automatica 19(6):775–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Parasuraman R, Riley V (1997) Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum Factors 39(2):230–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lundgren Malmstem V, Habibovic A, Andersson J, Lagström T, Nilsson M, Sirkka A, Fagerlönn J, Fredriksson R, Edgren C, Krupenia S, Saluäär D (2017) Will there be new communication needs when introducing automated vehicles to the urban context? In: Advances in human aspects of transportation

    Google Scholar 

  4. Habibovic A, Andersson J, Nilsson M, Lundgren Malmsten V, Nilsson J (2016) Evaluating interactions with non-existing automated vehicles: three Wizard of Oz approaches. In: Intelligent vehicles symposium (IV), 2016 IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  5. Habibovic A, Andersson J, Klingegård M, Malmsten-Lundgren V, Larsson S (2017) Let’s communicate: how to operate in harmony with automated vehicles. In: Khal M (ed) Special report: advances in automotive HMI. Automotive World Ltd, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andersson J, Englund C, Voronov A (2017) Study of communication needs in interaction between trucks and surrounding traffic in platooning. Gothenburg, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  7. Andersson J, Habibovic A, Klingegård M, Englund C, Malmsten-Lundgren V (2017) Hello Human, can you read my mind? ERCIM News

    Google Scholar 

  8. Breazeal C, Edsinger A, Fitzpatrick P, Scassellati B (2001) Active vision for sociable robots. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern—Part A: Syst Hum 31(5):443–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shattuck LG (1995) Communication of intent in distributed supervisory control systems

    Google Scholar 

  10. Watanabe A, Ikeda T, Morales Y, Shinozawa K, Miyashita T, Hagita N (2015) Communicating robotic navigational intentions. In: IEEE International conference on intelligent robots and systems, vol 2015–Dec, pp 5763–5769

    Google Scholar 

  11. Endsley MR (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 37(1):32–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Várhelyi A (1998) Drivers’ speed behaviour at a zebra crossing: a case study. Accid Anal Prev 30(6):731–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun R, Zhuang X, Wu C, Zhao G, Zhang K (2015) The estimation of vehicle speed and stopping distance by pedestrians crossing streets in a naturalistic traffic environment. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 30:97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang T, Wu J, Zheng P, McDonald M (2010) Study of pedestrians’ gap acceptance behavior when they jaywalk outside crossing facilities. In: 13th International IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Knoblauch R, Pietrucha M, Nitzburg M (1996) Field studies of pedestrian walking speed and start-up time. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1538:27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenbloom T (2009) Crossing at a red light: behaviour of individuals and groups. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 12(5):389–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lobjois R, Cavallo V (2007) Age-related differences in street-crossing decisions: the effects of vehicle speed and time constraints on gap selection in an estimation task. Accid Anal Prev 39(5):934–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sucha M, Dostal D, Risser R (2017) Pedestrian-driver communication and decision strategies at marked crossings. Accid Anal Prev 102:41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmidt S, Färber B (2009) Pedestrians at the kerb—recognising the action intentions of humans. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 12(4):300–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guéguen N, Meineri S, Eyssartier C (2015) A pedestrian’s stare and drivers’ stopping behavior: a field experiment at the pedestrian crossing. Saf Sci 75:87–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nasar JL (2003) Prompting drivers to stop for crossing pedestrians. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 6(3):175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Crowley-Koch BJ, Van Houten R, Lim E (2011) Effects of pedestrian prompts on motorist yielding at crosswalks. J Appl Behav Anal 44(1):121–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhuang X, Wu C (2014) Pedestrian gestures increase driver yielding at uncontrolled mid-block road crossings. Accid Anal Prev 70:235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ren Z, Jiang X, Wang W (2016) Analysis of the influence of pedestrians’ eye contact on drivers’ comfort boundary during the crossing conflict. Proc Eng 137:399–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dey D, Terken J (2017) Pedestrian interaction with vehicles: roles of explicit and implicit communication. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications (AutomotiveUI’17)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rothenbücher D, Li J, Sirkin D, Mok B, Ju W (2016) Ghost driver: a field study investigating the interaction between pedestrians and driverless vehicles. In: 25th IEEE International symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dey D, Eggen B, Martens M, Terken J (2017) The impact of vehicle appearance and vehicle behavior on pedestrian interaction with autonomous vehicles. In: Adjunct proceedings of the 9th international ACM conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications (AutomotiveUI’17)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Merat N, Madigan R, Nordhoff S (2016) Human factors, user requirements, and user acceptance of ride-sharing in automated vehicles

    Google Scholar 

  29. Böckle M-P, Pernestål Brenden A, Klingegård M, Habibovic A, Bout M (2017) SAV2P-exploring the impact of an interface for shared automated vehicles on pedestrians experience. AutomotiveUI

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stanciu SC, Eby DW, Molnar LJ, St. Louis RM, Zanier N (2017) Interpersonal communication and issues for autonomous vehicles

    Google Scholar 

  31. Clamann M, Aubert M, Cummings ML (2017) Evaluation of vehicle-to-pedestrian communication displays for autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Board (TRB)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Risto M, Emmenegger C, Vinkhuyzen E, Cefkin M, Hollan J (2017) Human-vehicle interfaces: the power of vehicle movement gestures in human road user coordination. In: Driving assessment conference

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kitazaki S, Myhre NJ (2015) Effects of non-verbal communication cues on decisions and confidence of drivers at an uncontrolled intersection. In: Proceedings of the eighth international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design, pp 113–119

    Google Scholar 

  34. Parkin J, Clark B, Clayton W, Ricci M, Parkhurst G (2016) Understanding interactions between autonomous vehicles and other road users: a literature review. Bristol, UK

    Google Scholar 

  35. Campbell M, Egerstedt M, How JP, Murray RM (2010) Autonomous driving in urban environments: approaches, lessons and challenges. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 368(1928):4649–4672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Färber B (2016) Communication and communication problems between autonomous vehicles and human drivers. In: Maurer M, Gerdes JC, Lenz B, Winner H (eds) Autonomous driving: technical, legal and social aspects. Springer, Berlin, pp 125–144

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chauvin C, Saad F (2000) Interaction and communication in dynamic control tasks: ship handling and car driving. In: Proceedings of international conference on traffic and transport psychology-ICTTP 2000, pp 101–111

    Google Scholar 

  38. Björklund GM, Åberg L (2005) Driver behaviour in intersections: formal and informal traffic rules. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 8(3):239–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Houtenbos M, Hagenzieker M, Wieringa P, Hale A (2005) The role of expectations in interaction behaviour between car drivers. In: Underwood G (ed) Traffic and transport psychology: theory and application. Kidlington, Oxford, pp 303–314

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sivak M, Schoettle B (2011) Toward understanding of on-road interaction of male and female drivers. Traffic Inj Prev 12:235–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. European Truck Platooning. European Truck Platooning Challenge 2016

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hoff KA, Bashir M (2014) Trust in automation. Hum Factors 57(3):407–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Heinkel D (2017) What we know about how autonomous driving will take hold

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azra Habibovic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Habibovic, A., Andersson, J., Malmsten Lundgren, V., Klingegård, M., Englund, C., Larsson, S. (2019). External Vehicle Interfaces for Communication with Other Road Users?. In: Meyer, G., Beiker, S. (eds) Road Vehicle Automation 5. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94896-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94896-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94895-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94896-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics