Skip to main content

Participatory Modeling in Relation to Other Modeling Frameworks and Languages

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Enterprise Modeling
  • 697 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the use of the participatory approach to modeling along with other modeling approaches. The chapter discusses typical requirements for a modeling approach to be considered if the approach is to be used in a participatory setting. The main principles of the ways of working with business modeling methods, such as business model canvas; enterprise architecture frameworks; as well as balanced scorecard development are presented. Participatory modeling is also suitable for various activities in information system (IS) development. In this regard, aspects of facilitation using agile approaches, the unified modeling method (UML), goal-oriented requirements engineering, and capability driven development are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ambler, S.: Agile Modeling: Effective Practices for Extreme Programming and the Unified Process, 1st edn. Wiley, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambler, S.: Agile Model Driven Development (AMDD): The Key to Scaling Agile Software Development. http://www.agilemodeling.com/essays/amdd.htm (2007)

  • Beck, K.: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, K., Cunningham, W.: A Laboratory for Teaching Object Oriented Thinking. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, NY, USA. Abg, 24(10), 1–6 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/74878.74879, ISBN 0-89791-333-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bubenko, J.A., Jr, Persson, A., Stirna, J.: User Guide of the Knowledge Management Approach Using Enterprise Knowledge Patterns. Deliverable D3, IST Programme project HyperKnowledge – Hypermedia and Pattern Based Knowledge Management for Smart Organisations. Project no. IST-2000-28401. Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, J., Kolp, M., Mylopoulos, J.: Towards requirements-driven information systems engineering: the Tropos project. Inf. Syst. 27(6), 365–389 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper K, Abraham SP, Unnithan RS, Chung L, Courtney S: Integrating visual goal models into the rational unified process. J. Vis. Lang. Comput., Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 551-583 (2006). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2006.10.005, ISSN: 1045-926X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dardenne, A., van Lamsweerde, A., Fickas, S.: Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Sci. Comput. Program. 20(1–2), 3–50 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Defense: DoDAF Architecture Framework Version 2.02. http://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/DODAF/DoDAF_v2-02_web.pdf (2009)

  • Donzelli, P.: A goal-driven and agent-based requirements engineering framework. Requir. Eng. 9(1), 16–39 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldkuhl, G., Lind, M., Seigerroth, U.: Method integration: the need for a learning perspective. IEEE Proc. Softw. 145(4), 113–118 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabis, J., Henkel, M., Kampars, J., Koç, H., Sandkuhl, K., Stamer, D., Stirna, J., Valverde, F., Zdravkovic, J.: Exploitation Package – The Final Version of Capability Driven Development Methodology, CaaS – Capability as a Service for Digital Enterprises. FP7 project no. 611351, Rostock University, Germany. http://caas-project.eu/ (2016)

  • Hüttermann, M.: DevOps for Developers. Apress, Heidelberg (2012). ISBN 978-1-4302-4570-4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johannesson, P., Boman, M., Bubenko, J., Wangler, B.: Conceptual Modelling. In: Hoare, C.A.R. (Series ed.) Prentice Hall International Series in Computer Science, 280 pp. Prentice Hall (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, P., Kruchten, P.: The Rational Unified Process Made Easy: A Practitioner’s Guide to the RUP (2003). ISBN 0-321-16609-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Larman, C.: Applying UML and Patterns: An Introduction to Object-Oriented Analysis and Design and Iterative Development, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinsons, M., Davison, R., Tse, D.: The balanced scorecard: a foundation for the strategic management of information systems. Decis. Support Syst. 25(3), 71–88 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niehaves, B., Stirna, J.: Participative enterprise modelling for balanced scorecard implementation. In: Proceedings of ECIS 2006. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2006/80 (2006)

  • OMG: OMG Unified Modeling Language, version 2.5. OMG Document Number formal/2015-03-01. http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5 (2015)

  • Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challenger. Wiley, New York (2010). ISBN: 978-0-470-87641-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, K.: Requirements Engineering – Fundamentals, Principles, and Techniques. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandkuhl, K., Stirna, J., Persson, A., Wißotzki, M.: Enterprise Modeling – Tackling Business Challenges with the 4EM Method. The Enterprise Engineering Series. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaber, K., Beedle, M.: Agile Software Development with SCRUM. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stirna, J., Kirikova, M.: Integrating Agile Modeling with participative Enterprise Modeling. In: Halpin, T.A., Proper, H.A., Krogstie, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods for Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD’08) held in conjunction with the CAiSE’08 Conference, Montpellier, France, 16–17 June 2008, pp. 171–184. http://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-337/paper14.pdf (2008)

  • The Open Group: TOGAF Version 9.1, an Open Group Standard. The Open Group online. http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/index.html

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Ministry of Defence: Proposed NAF v4 Meta-Model (MODEM). NATO Architecture Framework v4.0 Documentation. http://nafdocs.org/modem (2013)

  • Yu, E.: Towards modeling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE’97), Washington (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stirna, J., Persson, A. (2018). Participatory Modeling in Relation to Other Modeling Frameworks and Languages. In: Enterprise Modeling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94857-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94857-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94856-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94857-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics