Advertisement

Dominance Certificates for Combinatorial Optimization Problems

  • Daniel BerendEmail author
  • Steven S. Skiena
  • Yochai Twitto
Chapter
  • 841 Downloads
Part of the Springer Optimization and Its Applications book series (SOIA, volume 139)

Abstract

Heuristic algorithms, such as simulated annealing, are widely used in practice to solve combinatorial optimization problems. However, they offer no guarantees regarding the quality of the provided solution. An f(I) combinatorial dominance guarantee is a certificate that a solution is not worse than at least f(I) solutions for a particular problem instance I. In this paper, we introduce simple but general techniques for awarding combinatorial dominance certificates to arbitrary solutions of various optimization problems. We demonstrate these techniques by applying them to the Traveling Salesman and Maximum Satisfiability problems, and briefly experiment their usability.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Gregory Gutin and the referees for their helpful comments on this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    N. Alon, G. Gutin, M. Krivelevich, Algorithms with large domination ratio. J. Algorithms 50(1), 118–131 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Angluin, L.G. Valiant, Fast probabilistic algorithms for Hamiltonian circuits and matchings, in Proceedings of the Ninth annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 30–41, New York, NY (1977)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Applegate, R. Bixby, V. Chvatal, W. Cook. Concorde TSP solver (2006). See http://www.tsp.gatech.edu/concorde/
  4. 4.
    E. Balas, N. Simonetti, Linear time dynamic programming algorithms for some new classes of restricted TSPs: a computational study. INFORMS J. Comput. 13(1), 56–75 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Berend, S. Skiena, Y. Twitto, Combinatorial dominance guarantees for heuristic algorithms, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Analysis of Algorithms (AofA), Juan-les-Pins, France, June (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Berend, S. Skiena, Y. Twitto, Combinatorial dominance guarantees for problems with infeasible solutions. ACM Trans. Algorithms 5(1), 1–29 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. Deineko, G. Woeginger, A study of exponential neighborhoods for the traveling salesman problem and the quadratic assignment problem. Math. Programm. 87(3), 519–542 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Glover, Tabu search — Part I. ORSA J. Comput. 1(3), 190–206 (1989)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Glover, A. Punnen, The travelling salesman problem: new solvable cases and linkages with the development of new approximation algorithms. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 48(5), 502–510 (1997)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Gutin, A. Yeo, TSP tour domination and Hamilton cycle decompositions of regular digraphs. Oper. Res. Lett. 28(3), 107–111 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Gutin, A. Yeo, Polynomial approximation algorithms for the TSP and the QAP with a factorial domination number. Discret. Appl. Math. 119(1), 107–116 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Gutin, A. Yeo, A. Zverovich, Exponential neighborhoods and domination analysis for the TSP, in The Traveling Salesman Problem and its Variations, ed. by G. Gutin, A. Punnen (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2002), pp. 223–256Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Gutin, A. Yeo, A. Zverovich, Traveling salesman should not be greedy: domination analysis of greedy-type heuristics for the TSP. Discret. Appl. Math. 117(1), 81–86 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Gutin, A. Vainshtein, A. Yeo, Domination analysis of combinatorial optimization problems. Discret. Appl. Math. 129(2), 513–520 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Gutin, B. Goldengorin, J. Huang, Worst case analysis of max-regret, greedy and other heuristics for multidimensional assignment and traveling salesman problems. J. Heuristics 14(2), 169–181 (2008)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Hassin, S. Khuller, z-approximations. J. Algorithms 41(2), 429–442 (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.H. Holland, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1992)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Kirkpatrick, C.D. Gelatt Jr., M.P. Vecchi, Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598), 671–680 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A.E. Koller, S.D. Noble, Domination analysis of greedy heuristics for the frequency assignment problem. Discret. Math. 275(1), 331–338 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. Kühn, D. Osthus, Hamilton decompositions of regular expanders: a proof of Kelly’s conjecture for large tournaments. Adv. Math. 237, 62–146 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. Kühn, D. Osthus, V. Patel, A domination algorithm for {0,  1}-instances of the traveling salesman problem. Random Struct. Algorithms 48(3), 427–453 (2016)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. Mühlenbein, Genetic algorithms, in Local Search in Combinatorial Optimization, ed. by E. Aarts, J.-K. Lenstra (Wiley, New York, 1997), pp. 137–171Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    V. Phan, S. Skiena, P. Sumazin, A model for analyzing black-box optimization, in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2748 (Springer, Berlin 2003), pp. 424–438zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    L.S. Pitsoulis, M.G.C. Resende, Greedy randomized adaptive search procedures, in Handbook of Applied Optimization, ed. by P.M. Pardalos, M.G.C. Resende (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002), pp. 178–183Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. Punnen, S. Kabadi, Domination analysis of some heuristics for the asymmetric traveling salesman problem. Discret. Appl. Math. 119(1), 117–128 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Punnen, F. Margot, S. Kabadi, TSP heuristics: domination analysis and complexity. Algorithmica 35(2), 111–127 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Punnen, P. Sripratak, D. Karapetyan, Domination analysis of algorithms for bipartite boolean quadratic programs, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fundamentals of Computation Theory (FCT), pp. 271–282, Liverpool, August (2013)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    G. Reinelt, TSPLIB — a traveling salesman problem library. ORSA J. Comput. 3(4), 376–384 (1991). See also http://www.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/groups/comopt/software/TSPLIB95/
  29. 29.
    S. Ross, A First Course in Probability, 5th edn. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1998)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    V.I. Rublineckii, Estimates of the accuracy of procedures in the traveling salesman problem. Numer. Math. Comput. Technol. (in Russian) 4, 18–23 (1973)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    S. Russell, P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 2nd edn. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2003)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    V. Sarvanov, N. Doroshko, The approximate solution of the traveling salesman problem by a local algorithm that searches neighborhoods of exponential cardinality in quadratic time. Softw. Algorithm. Program. (in Russian) 31, 8–11 (1981)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    V. Sarvanov, N. Doroshko, The approximate solution of the traveling salesman problem by a local algorithm that searches neighborhoods of factorial cardinality in cubic time. Softw. Algorithm. Program. (in Russian) 31, 11–13 (1981)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Y. Twitto, Dominance guarantees for above-average solutions. Discret. Optim. 5(3), 563–568 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    E. Zemel, Measuring the quality of approximate solutions to zero-one programming problems. Math. Oper. Res. 6(3), 319–332 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Berend
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Steven S. Skiena
    • 3
  • Yochai Twitto
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and of Computer ScienceBen-Gurion UniversityBeer ShevaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsRice UniversityHoustonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA
  4. 4.Department of Computer ScienceBen-Gurion UniversityBeer ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations