Strategies to Improve Enzymes via Solid-State Fermentation

  • Indu BhushanEmail author
  • Manjot Kour
  • Guneet Kour
Part of the Biofuel and Biorefinery Technologies book series (BBT, volume 7)


Solid-state fermentation (SSF) is the fermentation process which occurs on a solid surface in the absence of “free” water, where the moisture is absorbed to the solid matrix. SSF is gaining an advantageous edge over other fermentation techniques due to its less complexity and more proximity to the normal environment of many microorganisms. On the other hand, a difficulty arises while estimating the biomass concentration in solid-state fermentation. Various factors like direct product application, the increased concentration of the product, less cost of production, and reduced energy requirement are responsible in making SSF as one of the potent technologies for various enzyme productions as seen in case of cellulase, tannase, and lipase. Improvisation of cellulase production in solid-state fermentation can be achieved to a greater extent by making use of varying degrees of substrates which are lignocellulosic in nature, the implicated microorganisms, culture, and process parameters like moisture content and water activity, nutrients diffusion, size of substrate particle, pH, temperature, surfactants, and bioreactor designs. Submerged fermentation whereas holds a different place in terms of various types of fermentations as it has only one major problem related to the oxygen transfer to microorganisms which in turn depends on the configuration, size, and the agitation/aeration system used in the reactor. In order to characterize oxygen transfer, a parameter is known as K La (oxygen transfer coefficient) whose value gives the estimation that how much of the oxygen is transferred by the equipment independent of the reactor volume and hence, for scale-up studies, it becomes an important parameter. In case of antioxidants production using SSF, it was observed that pomace tends to increase the antioxidant activity convergent with an increase in activity of β-glucosidase. Different studies tend to show that P. floridensis as an important organism used during the production of lingo cellulolytic enzyme and consecutive advancement in in vitro digestibility of wheat straw has been carried out to a larger extent.


Fermentation Biomass cellulases Lipases Tannase Phenolic oxidants 



We would love to thank School of Biotechnology, Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University, Katra, Jammu, J&K.


  1. Behera SS, Ray RC (2016) Solid state fermentation for production of microbial cellulases: recent advances and improvement strategies. Int J Biol Macromol 86:656–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Durand A (2003) Bioreactor designs for solid state fermentation. vol 13, pp 113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Manan M, Webb C (2018) Estimation of growth in solid state fermentation: a review. vol 14, pp 61–69Google Scholar
  4. Mienda B, Idi A (2011) Microbiological features of solid state fermentation and its applications. An overview. vol 2, pp 21–26Google Scholar
  5. Mitchell DA et al (2011) 2.25—Bioreactors for solid-state fermentation A2. In Moo-Young M (ed) Comprehensive biotechnology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 347–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Muthusamy C, Ps B (2013) Tannase: source, biocatalytic characteristics, and bioprocesses for production. pp 259–293Google Scholar
  7. Nagel FJ et al (2001) Temperature control in a continuously mixed bioreactor for solid-state fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng 72(2):219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ramos-Sánchez L et al (2015) Fungal lipase production by solid-state fermentation. vol 5, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  9. Rodríguez González J et al (2006) Improving lipase production by nutrient source modification using Rhizopus homothallicus cultured in solid state fermentation. Vol 41, pp 2264–2269Google Scholar
  10. Sharma RK, Arora DS (2010) Production of lignocellulolytic enzymes and enhancement of in vitro digestibility during solid state fermentation of wheat straw by Phlebia floridensis. Bioresour Technol 101(23):9248–9253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Singhania RR et al (2010) Advancement and comparative profiles in the production technologies using solid-state and submerged fermentation for microbial cellulases. Enzym Microb Technol 46(7):541–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Vattem DA, Shetty K (2002) Solid-state production of phenolic antioxidants from cranberry pomace by Rhizopus oligosporus. Food Biotechnol 16(3):189–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Viniegra-González G et al (2003) Advantages of fungal enzyme production in solid state over liquid fermentation systems. Biochem Eng J 13(2):157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. White BL, Howard LR, Prior RL (2010) Proximate and polyphenolic characterization of cranberry pomace. J Agric Food Chem 58(7):4030–4036CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shri Mata Vaishno Devi UniversityKatraIndia

Personalised recommendations