Advertisement

Integrated Lignocellulosic Biorefinery for Sustainable Bio-Based Economy

  • Jitendra Kumar SainiEmail author
  • Rishi Gupta
  • Hemansi
  • Amit Verma
  • Priyanka Gaur
  • Ritu Saini
  • Rishikesh Shukla
  • Ramesh Chander Kuhad
Chapter
Part of the Biofuel and Biorefinery Technologies book series (BBT, volume 7)

Abstract

Upsurge of interests in biomass-based economy has opened up many new challenges related to knowledge, technology, economics and society. The complexity of lignocellulosic biomass is comparable to petroleum, and hence, the concept of biorefinery has emerged. A better understanding of the complexity of the lignocellulosic biomass has helped in exploitation of each of its constituent at the fullest for production of a wide variety of products in comparison to the production of single products previously. The production of multiple products such as biofuels and other valuable bio-based materials from lignocellulosic feedstock requires integration of various processes in biorefinery operations in analogy with petroleum-based refineries. Therefore, it is important to understand key issues of lignocellulose biorefining. This chapter deals with the concept and practice of integrated lignocellulosic biorefinery for sustainable development, different products and the sustainability aspects. In the end, current status and future prospects of lignocellulosic biomass-based biorefinery are discussed.

Keywords

Biorefinery Biofuel Lignocellulose Sustainability Biomass 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial and infrastructural support from Central University of Haryana, Mahendergarh, Haryana, India is highly acknowledged. The authors also thank Science & Engineering research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology, Government of India for providing the financial support (SERB/LS/2016/00929).

References

  1. Agarwal L, Dutt K, Meghwanshi GK, Saxena RK (2008) Anaerobic fermentative production of lactic acid using cheese whey and corn steep liquor. Biotech Lett 30(4):631–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agler MT, Wrenn BA, Zinder SH, Angenent LT (2011) Waste to bioproduct conversion with undefined mixed cultures: the carboxylate platform. Trends Biotechnol 29(2):70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aithani D, Mohanty AK (2006) Value-added new materials from byproduct of corn based ethanol industries: blends of plasticized corn gluten meal and poly (ε-caprolactone). Ind Eng Chem Res 45(18):6147–6152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Zuhair S (2007) Production of biodiesel: possibilities and challenges. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin 1(1):57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amartey S, Jeffries TW (1994) Comparison of corn steep liquor with other nutrients in the fermentation of D-xylose by Pichia stipitis CBS 6054. Biotech Lett 16(2):211–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amidon TE, Liu S (2009) Water-based woody biorefinery. Biotechnol Adv 27(5):542–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anand P, Saxena RK (2012) A comparative study of solvent-assisted pretreatment of biodiesel derived crude glycerol on growth and 1, 3-propanediol production from Citrobacter freundii. New Biotechnol 29(2):199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bakshi B (2002) A thermodynamic framework for ecologically conscious process systems engineeringCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Balat M (2008) Possible methods for hydrogen production. Energy Sources Part Recovery Util Environ Eff 31:39–50.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15567030701468068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barbirato F, Chedaille D, Bories A (1997) Propionic acid fermentation from glycerol: comparison with conventional substrates. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 47(4):441–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Behzadi S, Farid MM (2007) Examining the use of different feedstock for the production of biodiesel. Asia-Pac J Chem Eng 2(5):480–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berk Z (1992) Technology of production of edible flours and protein products from soybeans. FAO Agric Serv Bull 97:1–10Google Scholar
  13. Bormann EJ, Roth M (1999) The production of polyhydroxybutyrate by Methylobacterium rhodesianum and Ralstonia eutropha in media containing glycerol and casein hydrolysates. Biotech Lett 21(12):1059–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bos HL, Sanders JP (2013) Raw material demand and sourcing options for the development of a bio-based chemical industry in Europe. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin 7(3):246–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. BREW (2006) Medium and long-term opportunities and risks of the biotechnological production of bulk chemicals from renewable resources—the potential of white biotechnology. The BREW Project, Final Report, Utrecht, September 2006, 9–103Google Scholar
  16. Brumbley SM, Purnell MP, Petrasovits LA, Nielsen LK, Twine PH (2007) Developing the sugarcane biofactory for high-value biomaterials. Int Sugar J 1297:5Google Scholar
  17. Chandra R, Takeuchi H, Hasegawa T, Kumar R (2012) Improving biodegradability and biogas production of wheat straw substrates using sodium hydroxide and hydrothermal pretreatments. Energy 43:273–282.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.04.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheng CL, Lo YC, Lee KS, Lee DJ, Lin CY, Chang JS (2011) Biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic feedstock. Biores Technol 102(18):8514–8523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cherubini F, Ulgiati S (2010) Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems—a LCA case study. Appl Energy 87(1):47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Azeredo LAI, De Lima MB, Coelho RRR, Freire DMG (2006) A low-cost fermentation medium for thermophilic protease production by Streptomyces sp. 594 using feather meal and corn steep liquor. Curr Microbiol 53(4):335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Bhowmick DG, Sarmah AK, Sen R (2018) Lignocellulosic biorefinery as a model for sustainable development of biofuels and value added products. Biores Technol 247:1144–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. de Jong E, Higson A, Walsh P, Wellisch M (2012) Product developments in the bio-based chemicals arena. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining 6:606–624.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Demirbas A (2005) Biodiesel production from vegetable oils via catalytic and non-catalytic supercritical methanol transesterification methods. Prog Energy Combust Sci 31(5):466–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Doleyres Y, Beck P, Vollenweider S, Lacroix C (2005) Production of 3-hydroxypropionaldehyde using a two-step process with Lactobacillus reuteri. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 68(4):467–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eggink G, Eenink AH, Huizing HJ (1994) PHB-producing microorganism and process for removing glycerol from a culture medium. Patent publication number WO9409146Google Scholar
  26. Fahlén E, Ahlgren EO (2009) Assessment of integration of different biomass gasification alternatives in a district-heating system. Energy 34:2184–2195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fan J, Shonnard DR, Kalnes TN, Johnsen PB, Rao S (2013) A life cycle assessment of pennycress (Thlaspi arvense L.)—derived jet fuel and diesel. Biomass Bioenergy 55:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gallego A, Hospido A, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2011) Environmental assessment of dehydrated alfalfa production in Spain. Resour Conserv Recycl 55(11):1005–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ganjyal GM, Reddy N, Yang YQ, Hanna MA (2004) Biodegradable packaging foams of starch acetate blended with corn stalk fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 93(6):2627–2633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gennadios A (ed) (2002) Protein-based films and coatings. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Gunasekara MY, Edwards DW (2003) Estimating the environmental impact of catastrophic chemical releases to the atmosphere: an index method for ranking alternative chemical process routes. Process Saf Environ Prot 81:463–474.  https://doi.org/10.1205/095758203770866638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hamelinck CN, van Hooijdonk G, Faaij AP (2005) Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle- and long-term. Biomass Bioenergy 28:384–410.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hofer R, Bigorra J (2008) Biomass-based green chemistry: sustainable solutions for modern economies. Green Chem Lett Rev 1:79–97.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17518250802342519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hossain GS, Liu L, Du GC (2016) Industrial bioprocesses and the biorefinery concept. In: Larroche C Sanromán MA, Du G, Pandey A (eds) Current developments in biotechnology and bioengineering: bioprocesses, bioreactors and controls. Elsevier, 2017, pp 3–27. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-63663-8.00001-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Institute for Environment and Sustainability (2010) Analysis of existing environmental impact assessment methodologies for use in life cycle assessment. In: ILCD handbook, 1st ed. European Commission Joint Research CenterGoogle Scholar
  36. ISO (2006) ISO 14040:2006—environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html. Accessed 7 Dec 2017
  37. Jerez A, Partal P, Martinez I, Gallegos C, Guerrero A (2005) Rheology and processing of gluten based bioplastics. Biochem Eng J 26(2):131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kajaste R (2014) Chemicals from biomass–managing greenhouse gas emissions in biorefinery production chains–a review. J Clean Prod 75:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kamm B, Gruber PR, Kamm M (2007) Biorefineries—industrial processes and products. In: Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaAGoogle Scholar
  40. Kamm B, Kamm M (1997) Tagungsband/Symposium Chemie nachwachsender Rohstoffe: Wien, 9/10. Sept 1997. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Jugend und Familie, WienGoogle Scholar
  41. Kamm B, Kamm M (2004) Principles of biorefineries. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 64(2):137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kemp R, Martens P (2007) Sustainable development: how to manage something that is subjective and never can be achieved? Sustain Sci Pract Policy 3:5–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2007.11907997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kılıc Apar D, Ozbek B (2007) Hydrolysis and solubilization of corn gluten by Neutrase. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 82(12):1107–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kim JM, Whang JH, Kim KM, Koh JH, Suh HJ (2004) Preparation of corn gluten hydrolysate with angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitory activity and its solubility and moisture sorption. Process Biochem 39(8):989–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kim J, Yun S, Ounaies Z (2006) Discovery of cellulose as a smart material. Macromolecules 39(12):4202–4206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kumar R, Singh S, Singh OV (2008) Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: biochemical and molecular perspectives. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35:377–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lakaniemi AM, Tuovinen OH, Puhakka JA (2013) Anaerobic conversion of microalgal biomass to sustainable energy carriers–a review. Biores Technol 135:222–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Langeveld H, Sanders J, Meeusen-van Onna MJG (2012) The biobased economy: biofuels, materials, and chemicals in the post oil eraGoogle Scholar
  49. Leduc S, Schwab D, Dotzauer E et al (2008) Optimal location of wood gasification plants for methanol production with heat recovery. Int J Energy Res 32:1080–1091.  https://doi.org/10.1002/er.1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lehmann A, Russi D, Bala A et al (2011) Integration of social aspects in decision support, based on life cycle thinking. Sustainability 3:562–577.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su3040562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Liu S, Lu H, Hu R, Shupe A, Lin L, Liang B (2012) A sustainable woody biomass biorefinery. Biotechnol Adv 30(4):785–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Luo L, van der Voet E, Huppes G (2010) Biorefining of lignocellulosic feedstock–technical, economic and environmental considerations. Biores Technol 101(13):5023–5032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Maity SK (2015) Opportunities, recent trends and challenges of integrated biorefinery: part I. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:1427–1445.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McCormick K, Kautto N (2013) The bioeconomy in Europe: an overview. Sustainability 5:2589–2608.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Menon V, Rao M (2012) Trends in bioconversion of lignocellulose: biofuels, platform chemicals & biorefinery concept. Prog Energy Combust Sci 38(4):522–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Moncada BJ, Aristizábal MV, Cardona ACA (2016) Design strategies for sustainable biorefineries. Biochem Eng J 116:122–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2016.06.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Moncada J, Cardona CA, Rincón LE (2015) Design and analysis of a second and third generation biorefinery: the case of castorbean and microalgae. Biores Technol 198:836–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B et al (2005) Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 96:673–686.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nakamura CE, Whited GM (2003) Metabolic engineering for the microbial production of 1, 3-propanediol. Curr Opin Biotechnol 14(5):454–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nass LL, Pereira PAA, Ellis D (2007) Biofuels in Brazil: an overview. Crop Sci 47(6):2228–2237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nel S (2010) The potential of biotechnology in the sugarcane industry: are you ready for the next evolution? Int Sugar J 112(1333):11Google Scholar
  62. NREL Integrated Biorefinery Research Facility. Bioenergy. NREL. https://www.nrel.gov/bioenergy/ibrf.html. Accessed 31 Dec 2017
  63. Posada JA, Osseweijer P (2016) Socioeconomic and environmental considerations for sustainable supply and fractionation of lignocellulosic biomass in a biorefinery context. In: Mussatto SI (ed) Biomass fractionation technologies for a lignocellulosic feedstock based biorefinery. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 611–631.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802323-5.00026-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B (2000) Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: Inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibitionGoogle Scholar
  65. Parada PM, Osseweijer P, Posada Duque JA (2017) Sustainable biorefineries, an analysis of practices for incorporating sustainability in biorefinery design. Ind Crops Prod 106:105–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.08.052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Quéméneur M, Hamelin J, Barakat A et al (2012) Inhibition of fermentative hydrogen production by lignocellulose-derived compounds in mixed cultures. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:3150–3159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.11.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Samarasinghe S, Easteal AJ, Edmonds NR (2008) Biodegradable plastic composites from corn gluten meal. Polym Int 57(2):359–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Santoyo-Castelazo E, Azapagic A (2014) Sustainability assessment of energy systems: integrating environmental, economic and social aspects. J Clean Prod 80:119–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sarma SJ, Ayadi M, Brar SK (2017) Biorefinery: general overview. In: Platform chemical biorefinery, pp 21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Seider W, Seader J, lewin D, Widadgo S (2010) Product and process design principles. Synthesis, analysis and evaluation, 3rd ed. WileyGoogle Scholar
  71. Shonnard DR, Hiew DS (2000) Comparative environmental assessments of VOC recovery and recycle design alternatives for a gaseous waste stream. Environ Sci Technol 34:5222–5228.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es0010857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shukla R, Cheryan M (2001) Zein: the industrial protein from corn. Ind Crops Prod 13(3):171–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Souza GM, Victoria RL, Joly CA, Verdade LM (2015) Bioenergy & sustainability: bridging the gaps. SCOPE, Sao PauloGoogle Scholar
  74. Speight JG (2014) The chemistry and technology of petroleum. CRC pressGoogle Scholar
  75. Stefanis SK, Livingston AG, Pistikopoulos EN (1995) Minimizing the environmental impact of process plants: a process systems methodology. Comput Chem Eng 19:39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Szuhaj BF (ed) (1989) Lecithins: sources, manufacture & uses, vol 12. The American Oil Chemists SocietyGoogle Scholar
  77. Talebian-Kiakalaieh A, Amin NAS, Hezaveh H (2014) Glycerol for renewable acrolein production by catalytic dehydration. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 40:28–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tan EC, Talmadge M, Dutta A, Hensley J, Snowden-Swan LJ, Humbird D, Schaidle J, Biddy M (2016) Conceptual process design and economics for the production of high-octane gasoline blendstock via indirect liquefaction of biomass through methanol/dimethyl ether intermediates. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin 10(1):17–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vancauwenberge JE, Slininger PJ, Bothast RJ (1990) Bacterial conversion of glycerol to beta-hydroxypropionaldehyde. Appl Environ Microbiol 56(2):329–332Google Scholar
  80. Wetterlund E, Soderstrom M (2010) Biomass gasification in district heating systems—the effect of economic energy policies. Appl Energy 87:2914–2922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Report of the World Commission on environment and development: our common future. available at http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf. Accessed on 20 Dec 2017
  82. Yao K, Tang C (2013) Controlled polymerization of next-generation renewable monomers and beyond. Macromolecules 46(5):1689–1712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Young DM, Cabezas H (1999) Designing sustainable processes with simulation: the waste reduction (WAR) algorithm. Comput Chem Eng 23:1477–1491.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(99)00306-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zheng Y, Pan Z, Zhang R (2009) Overview of biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production. Int J Agric Biol Eng 2:51–68Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jitendra Kumar Saini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rishi Gupta
    • 2
    • 7
  • Hemansi
    • 1
  • Amit Verma
    • 3
  • Priyanka Gaur
    • 1
  • Ritu Saini
    • 4
  • Rishikesh Shukla
    • 1
  • Ramesh Chander Kuhad
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologySchool of Interdisciplinary & Applied Life Sciences, Central University of HaryanaMahendergarhIndia
  2. 2.Department of BiotechnologySchool of Interdisciplinary & Applied Life Sciences, Central University of HaryanaMahendergarhIndia
  3. 3.Department of BiochemistryCollege of Basic Sciences and Humanities, S D Agricultural UniversitySK NagarIndia
  4. 4.Department of BioenergyDBT-IOC Centre for Advanced Bioenergy ResearchFaridabadIndia
  5. 5.Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of Delhi South CampusNew DelhiIndia
  6. 6.Central University of HaryanaMahendergarhIndia
  7. 7.SVI Research, SVI AnalyticaGurugramIndia

Personalised recommendations