Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Equality in Education
  • 433 Accesses

Abstract

France and England have many similarities in terms of their polity, economy, welfare systems, and as former colonial powers with sizeable immigrant populations. Yet there are important differences between them which are manifested in their education systems. Social equality in education is used here to frame this difference and the distinctive ideological legacy at the heart of both systems i.e. republicanism in France and liberalism in England, is key to understanding this. The period between 1789 and 1939 is selected as the optimum time-period for demonstrating this variation. A comparative methodology is used to explain the variation between both education systems and three explanatory factors are identified: persistence of ideology, social class alliances, and, the nature of the state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    England is taken here as the unit of comparison. However, it is unavoidable that Britain and the UK (United Kingdom) will be referred to in the comparative analysis especially when referring to the unitary nation state which, depending on the period following the respective Acts of Union, will refer to England and Wales (after 1536) or England, Scotland and Wales (after 1707) or England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland (after 1801), or England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland (after 1922). Responsibility for education has also been devolved to the separate countries.

  2. 2.

    On this point it is important to note the distinction between English and continental liberalism. The liberal monarchy of Louis Philippe, 1830–1848, in France, espoused the values of liberalism while at the same time upholding state control of education. Continental European liberals were involved in setting up national state systems in education and some favoured free common schooling, for example, in Scandinavia.

Bibliography

  • Archer, M.S. 1979. Social Origins of Educational Systems. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadfoot, P. 1985. Changing Patterns of Educational Accountability in England and France. Comparative Education 21 (3): 272–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, J.M. 1994. Evidence and Explanations in History and Sociology: Critical Reflections on Goldthorpe’s Critique of Historical Sociology. British Journal of Sociology 45 (1): 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, J. 1991. The Uses of History in Sociology: Reflections on Some Recent Tendencies. British Journal of Sociology 42 (2): 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. 1990. Education and State Formation: The Rise of Education Systems in England, France and the USA. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. 2002. Education, Globalisation and the Role of Comparative Research. London: Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., and D. Eds Rueschemeyer. 2003. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouzelis, N. 1994. In Defence of ‘Grand’ Historical Sociology. British Journal of Sociology 45 (1): 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C.C. 1981. Comparative Sociology and the Comparative Method. International Journal of Comparative Sociology XXII (1–2): 102–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C.C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T., and M. Somers. 1980. The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry. Comparative Studies in Society and History 22 (2): 174–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smelzer, N.J. 1973. The Methodology of Comparative Analysis. In Comparative Research Methods, ed. D. Warwick and S. Osherson, 42–86. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiborg, S. 2009. Education and Social Integration: Comprehensive Schooling in Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Doyle, A.M. (2018). Introduction. In: Social Equality in Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94721-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94721-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94720-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94721-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics