• Ann Margaret Doyle


France and England have many similarities in terms of their polity, economy, welfare systems, and as former colonial powers with sizeable immigrant populations. Yet there are important differences between them which are manifested in their education systems. Social equality in education is used here to frame this difference and the distinctive ideological legacy at the heart of both systems i.e. republicanism in France and liberalism in England, is key to understanding this. The period between 1789 and 1939 is selected as the optimum time-period for demonstrating this variation. A comparative methodology is used to explain the variation between both education systems and three explanatory factors are identified: persistence of ideology, social class alliances, and, the nature of the state.


  1. Archer, M.S. 1979. Social Origins of Educational Systems. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Broadfoot, P. 1985. Changing Patterns of Educational Accountability in England and France. Comparative Education 21 (3): 272–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryant, J.M. 1994. Evidence and Explanations in History and Sociology: Critical Reflections on Goldthorpe’s Critique of Historical Sociology. British Journal of Sociology 45 (1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goldthorpe, J. 1991. The Uses of History in Sociology: Reflections on Some Recent Tendencies. British Journal of Sociology 42 (2): 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Green, A. 1990. Education and State Formation: The Rise of Education Systems in England, France and the USA. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Green, A. 2002. Education, Globalisation and the Role of Comparative Research. London: Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
  7. Mahoney, J., and D. Eds Rueschemeyer. 2003. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Moore, B. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Mouzelis, N. 1994. In Defence of ‘Grand’ Historical Sociology. British Journal of Sociology 45 (1): 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ragin, C.C. 1981. Comparative Sociology and the Comparative Method. International Journal of Comparative Sociology XXII (1–2): 102–120.Google Scholar
  11. Ragin, C.C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  12. Skocpol, T. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Skocpol, T., and M. Somers. 1980. The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry. Comparative Studies in Society and History 22 (2): 174–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Smelzer, N.J. 1973. The Methodology of Comparative Analysis. In Comparative Research Methods, ed. D. Warwick and S. Osherson, 42–86. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Wiborg, S. 2009. Education and Social Integration: Comprehensive Schooling in Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann Margaret Doyle
    • 1
  1. 1.UCL Institute of EducationUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations