Advertisement

Efficiency of Cycling Pads in Reducing Seat Pressure During Cycling

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 777)

Abstract

Cycling may induce urogenital problems in men and women. This research aimed at investigating the effects of chamois design on seat pressure distribution during cycling. Maximum seat pressures were quantified for nine male test persons using three different chamois designs (thick, thin and no chamois) using a pressure mat. The effects of chamois design, work rate and hand position were tested on maximum pressure at the perineum region, the left hip bone region and the right hip bone region. The study showed that chamois design affected maximum pressures on the saddle. The thick chamois had an overall maximum pressure of 640 mbar (SE 14), which was 50 mbar lower than the thin chamois design. The results suggest that the effect of chamois design on urogenital compression syndromes may be underestimated.

Keywords

Human factors Seat pressure Urogenital compression syndromes 

References

  1. 1.
    Carnall, D.: Cycling and health promotion - a safer, slower urban road environment is the key. BMJ 320, 888 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bassett, D., Pucher, J., Buehler, R., Thompson, D.L.: Walking, cycling and obesity rates in Europe, North America, and Australia. J. Phys. Activity Health 5, 795–814 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scully, D., Kremer, J., Meade, M.M., Graham, R., Dudgeon, K.: Physical exercise and psychological well being: a critical review. Br. J. Sports Med. 32, 111–120 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shephard, R.J.: Is active commuting the answer to population health? Sports Med. 38, 751–758 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Femtem, P.H.: ABC of sports medicine. Benefits of exercise in health and disease. BMJ 308, 1291–1295 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schwarzer, U., et al.: Cycling and penile oxygen pressure: the type of saddle matters. Eur. Urol. 41(2), 139–143 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lowe, B.D., Schrader, S.M., Breitenstein, M.J.: Effect of bicycle saddle designs on the pressure to the perineum of the bicyclist. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 36(6), 1055–1062 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schrader, S.M., Breitenstein, M.J., Lowe, B.D.: Cutting off the nose to save the penis. J. Sex. Med. 5(8), 1932–1940 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weiss, B.D.: Clinical syndromes associated with bicycle seats. Clin. Sports Med. 13(1), 175–186 (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andersen, K.V., Bovim, G.: Impotence and nerve entrapment in long distance amateur cyclists. Acta Neurol. Scand. 95(4), 233–240 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guess, M.K., et al.: Women’s bike seats: a pressing matter for competitive female cyclists. J. Sex. Med. 8(11), 3144–3153 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guess, M.K., et al.: Genital sensation and sexual function in women bicyclists and runners: are your feet safer than your seat? J. Sex. Med. 3(6), 1018–1027 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marceau, L.D., et al.: Moderate vs. sport cycling and erectile dysfunction: Epidemiological results from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 153(11), S229 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sommer, F., et al.: Impotence and genital numbness in cyclists. Int. J. Sports Med. 22(6), 410–413 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spears, I.R., et al.: The effect of saddle design on stresses in the perineum during cycling. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 35(9), 1620–1625 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carpes, F.P., et al.: Bicycle saddle pressure: effects of trunk position and saddle design on healthy subjects. Urol. Int. 82(1), 8–11 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bressel, E., Bliss, S., Cronin, J.: A field-based approach for examining bicycle seat design effects on seat pressure and perceived stability. Appl. Ergonomics 40(3), 472–476 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Astrand, I.: Aerobic work capacity in men and women with special reference to age. Acta Physiol. Scand. Suppl. 49(169), 1–92 (1960)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Astrand, P.O., Ryhming, I.: A nomogram for calculation of aerobic capacity (physical fitness) from pulse rate during sub-maximal work. J. Appl. Physiol. 7(2), 218–221 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Noonan, V., Dean, E.: Submaximal exercise testing: clinical application and interpretation. Phys. Ther. 80(8), 782–807 (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Natrup, J., Ferrauti, A., Remmert, H.: Plantare Druckverteilung vor und nach einem Marathonlauf. In: Trainingswissenschaft im Freizeitsport, Symposium der dvs.Sektion Trainingswissenschaften, pp. 175–178 (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schade, D., Natrup, J., Fritz, M.: Druckverteilung auf Fahrradsätteln nach Maß. Orthopädieschuhtechnik 7(8), 28–31 (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bressel, E., Cronin, J.: Bicycle seat interface pressure: reliability, validity, and influence of hand position and workload. J. Biomech. 38(6), 1325–1331 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Keselman, H.J., Algina, J., Kowalchuk, R.K.: The analysis of repeated measures designs: a review. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 54, 1–20 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leibovitch, I., Mor, Y.: The vicious cycling: Bicycling related urogenital disorders. Eur. Urol. 47(3), 277–287 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sommer, F., et al.: Changes in penile blood flow during cycling: what precautions should be taken to avoid a decreased perfusion? Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 126(34–35), 939–943 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Partin, S.N., et al.: The bar sinister: does handlebar level damage the pelvic floor in female cyclists? J. Sex. Med. 9(5), 1367–1373 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bressel, E., Larson, B.J.: Bicycle seat designs and their effect on pelvic angle, trunk angle, and comfort. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 35(2), 327–332 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mattel, M.S., Jacoy, J.: Is there an optimal number of alternatives for likert scale items. Study, reliability and validity. Educ. Physiol. Meas. 31(3), 657 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Product Development, Faculty of Design SciencesUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpenBelgium
  2. 2.Measure, Model and Manage Bioresponses (M3-BIORES), Division Animal and Human Health EngineeringKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations