Emotions Appraisal with Face Reading in a Touristic Virtual Environment Prototype

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 777)


User engagement is an essential condition for assessing the quality of an interactive experience. Nowadays, the tourism industry has been using experiences based on interactive proposals to involving users. However, tourism industry needs more effective strategies in the dissemination of the cultural contents, whether material or immaterial, and in particular in emerging countries such as the São Tomé and Príncipe Islands. In this context, how can the tourism industry offer contents capable to provide levels of engagement able to attract potential tourists to visit these tourist spots. And so, the development of immersive proposals in a virtual environment, can play an important role to engage potential tourists. In this context, this article has as primary goal the evaluating how 3D environments and interaction strategy can influence the emotional reactions of potential users of this product. In particular, we want to know if this virtual environment is capable of involving participants and provide interactive experiences capable to seducing and arousing interest in the islands. This evaluation was made using the Face-Reading tool, Self-Assessment-Mannequin (SAM) and Geneva Emotion wheel (GEW). The data collection tools used (Face-Reading, SAM and GEW) allowed to identify differences between the different moments of the game interaction, and they also presented similar results. In conclusion, Face-Reading achieves a level of continuous discrimination of the user experience, particularly in relation to engagement, allowing a better identification of the moments associated with the emotional reactions.


Engagement Game design Face reading 



This work was co-financed by the Portuguese Foundation of Science and Technology under the project UID/EAT/04008/2013 (CIAUD).

A Ph.D. scholarship (SFRH/BD/129105/2017) granted to Yanick Trindade, from FCT: Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (the Portuguese Science Foundation), supported this study.


  1. 1.
    Seibert, G.: Camaradas, Clientes e Compadres: Colonialismo, Socialismo e Democratização em São Tomé e Príncipe, 2nd edn. Vega Editora, Lisboa (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Robinson, P., Lück, M., Smith, S.: Tourism, 1st edn. CABI, Wallingford (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benea, I.: Influences of Social Media on the Tourism and Hospitality Industry. Modul Vienna University, Vienna (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Steenjacobsen, J.: Nomadic tourism and fleeting place encounters: exploring different aspects of sightseeing. Scand. J. Hospitality Tourism (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gibson, A., O’Rawe, M.: Virtual reality as a travel promotional tool: insights a consumer travel fair. In: Jung, T., Dieck., M. (eds.) Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boyle, E., Connolly, T., Hainey, T., Boyle, J.: Engagement in digital entertainment games: a systematic review (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Csíkszentmihályi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper and Row, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deci, E., Ryan, R.: Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behaviour. Plenum, New York (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brockmyer, J., Fox, C., Curtiss, K., McBroom, E., Burkhart, K., Pidruzny, J.: The development of the Game engagement questionnaire: a measure of engagement in video game-playing. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45, 624–634 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weibel, D., Wissmath, B., Habegger, S., Steiner, Y., Groner, R.: Playing online games against computer-vs. human-controlled opponents: effects on presence, flow, and enjoyment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24(5), 2274–2291 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bersak, D., McDarby, G., Augenblick, N., McDarby, P., McDonnell, D., McDonald, B., Karkun, R.: Intelligent Biofeedback using an Immersive Competitive Environment (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jonathan, J., Brown, S.: Affective gaming: measuring emotion through the gamepad. In: CHI Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 732–733 (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Bradley, M., Lang, P.: Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiat 25, 49–59 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sacharin, V., Schlegel, K., Scherer, K.: Geneva Emotion Wheel Rating Study. Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CIAUD, Faculdade de ArquiteturaUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Ergonomics Laboratory, Faculdade de Motricidade HumanaUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations