A Framework to Use Virtual Reality for Behavior Change to Promote Safety and Health at Work

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 777)


Virtual reality (VR) was created to give and enhance good user experiences, when the participants interact with virtual environments. These experiences have been successfully used in entertainment contexts, giving unforgettable user experiences. Nowadays, VR as used as a persuasive technology intentionally designed to change people’s attitude and behavior in different contexts (i.g. marketing, health). In this context, the objective of this paper is to discuss about the potentialities of VR for behavior change and presents a framework to use VR for behavior change, particularly related with safety at work situations. This framework is composed by five steps, to include VR in an organization. A discussion about the measurements and VR equipment’s to be used is made, to help the potential professionals to use VR to worker behavior changes proposals. In synthesis, this framework may not only improve worker behavior increasing the awareness of potential risks in the real work, but also unconsciously influence their routine behaviors which lead to the safety.


Virtual reality Behavior change Safety and health 



This work was co-financed by the Portuguese Foundation of Science and Technology under the project UID/EAT/04008/2013 (CIAUD).


  1. 1.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morris, M., Guilak, F.: Mobile heart health: project highlight. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 8(2), 57–61 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fox, J., Bailenson, J., Binney, J.: Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 18(4), 294–303 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rosenberg, R.S., Baughman, S.L., Bailenson, J.N.: Virtual superheroes: using superpowers in virtual reality to encourage prosocial behavior. PLoS ONE 8(1), e55003 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahn, S.J., Fox, J., Dale, K.R., Avant, J.A.: Framing virtual experiences: effects on environmental efficacy and behavior over time. Commun. Res. 42(6), 839–863 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zaalberg, R., Midden, C.: Enhancing human responses to climate change risks through simulated flooding experiences. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) Proceedings PERSUASIVE 2010: 5th International Conference on Persuasive Technology. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6137, pp. 205–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hanus, M.D., Fox, J.: Persuasive avatars: the effects of customizing a virtual salesperson’s appearance on brand liking and purchase intentions. Int. J. Hum-Comput. Stud. 84, 33–40 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chittaro, L., Sioni, R., Crescentini, C., Fabbro, F.: Mortality salience in virtual reality experiences and its effects on users’ attitudes towards risk. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 101, 10–22 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wallach, H.S., Safir, M.P., Samana, R.: Personality variables and presence. Virtual Reality 14(1), 3–13 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kober, S.E., Neuper, C.: Personality and presence in virtual reality: does their relationship depend on the used presence measure? Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 29(1), 13–25 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rebelo, F., Noriega, P., Duarte, E., Soares, M.: Using virtual reality to assess user experience. Hum. Factors 54(6), 964–982 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kuliga, S.F., Thrash, T., Dalton, R.C., Hölscher, C.: Virtual reality as an empirical research tool - exploring user experience in a real building and a corresponding virtual model. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 54, 363–375 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lawson, G., Salanitri, D., Waterfield, B.: Future directions for the development of virtual reality within an automotive manufacturer. Appl. Ergon. 53(Part B), 323–330 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Craig, A.R., Franklin, J.A., Andrews, G.: A scale to measure locus of control of behaviour. Br. J. Med. Psychol. 57(2), 173–180 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CIAUD, School of ArchitectureUniversidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.ErgoLab, Faculdade de Motricidade HumanaUniversidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal
  3. 3.IEDUV, Intituto Educacional VeronesiGrande VitóriaBrazil

Personalised recommendations