Advertisement

Affordances on Route Selection in an Emergency Situation: A Study with Children

Conference paper
  • 1.5k Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 777)

Abstract

Understanding the influence of affordances during the processes of route selection could be a key factor to improve egress in emergency situations. Previous studies [1], showed that in a T-type corridor, the brightness acted as factor of attraction improving the affordance of that corridor in an emergency egress situation Here, we test this effect in children. Participants were presented with an adapted narrative of a fire inside a school. Their task was to choose which of the two corridors they would follow to leave school. We used T-type intersections in which one corridor (left or right) was brighter than the other. Bright corridors were chosen 48% for group aged 3 to 6 years, 65% for group aged 7 to 10 and 90% for adults. Results can be interpreted as children looking at affordances in a different way than adults, what might have implications in the design of safety built environments.

Keywords

Affordances Children Emergency egress Wayfinding 

References

  1. 1.
    Vilar, E., Rebelo, F., Noriega, P., Teles, J., Mayhorn, B.C.: The influence of environmental features on route selection in an emergency situation. Appl. Ergon. 44(4), 618–627 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prieske, B., Withagen, R., Smith, J., Zaal, F.: Affordances in a simple playscape: are children attracted to challenging affordances? J. Environ. Psychol. 41, 101–111 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vilar, E., Rebelo, F., Noriega, P., Duarte, E., Mayhorn, B.C.: Effects of competing environmental variables and signage on route-choices in simulated everyday and emergency wayfinding situations. Ergonomics 57(4), 511–524 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taylor, L.H., Socov, E.W.: The movement of people toward light. J. Illum. Eng. Soc. 3, 237–241 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peden, M., Kayode, O., Ozanne-Smith, J., Hyder, A.A., Branche, C., Fazlur Rahman, A.K.M., et al.: World report on child injury prevention. World Health Organization and UNICEF, Geneva (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cordovil, R., Araújo, D., Pepping, G., Barreiros, J.: An ecological stance on risk and safe behaviors in children: the role of affordances and emergent behaviors. New Ideas Psychol. 36, 50–59 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cordovil, R., Barreiros, J., Vieira, F., Neto, C.: The efficacy of safety barriers for children: absolute efficacy, time to cross and action modes in children between 19 and 75 months. Int. J. Inj. Control Safety Promot. 16(3), 143–151 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cordovil, R., Vieira, F., Barreiros, J.: Crossing safety barriers: influence of children’s morphological and functional variables. Appl. Ergon. 43(3), 515–520 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ulrich, B.D., Thelen, E., Niles, D.: Perceptual determinants of action: stair-climbing choices of infants and toddlers. In: Clark, J., Humphrey, J. (eds.) Advances in Motor Development Research III, pp. 01–15. AMS Press, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gibson, E.J.: The world is so full of a number of things: on specification and perceptual learning. Ecol. Psychol. 15(4), 283–287 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ergonomics Lab, Faculty of Human KineticsUniversidade de LisboaCruz Quebrada - DafundoPortugal
  2. 2.CIAUD, Lisbon School of ArchitectureUniversidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations