Abstract
Following the increased interest in students becoming partners in teaching and learning in higher education settings, this study explores students’ perceptions on a collaborative content generation activity, in which students assume also the role of peer-tutors. Students in an Information Systems course collaborated on domain topics, assigned to them by the teacher, and created learning material for their fellow students. In the peer-tutoring session following the creation of the learning material, students presented the topic in class and discussed it with their peers. Each peer tutoring session was assessed by the students as audience (students attending the student-tutoring sessions). The aim of the study is to explore students’ perspectives on the collaborative content generation assignment. Our focus primarily is to examine how students’ experiences regarding the collaboration were affected by learning strategies in self-regulation, peer learning, and help seeking. Results showed that students were more engaged in the course after participating in the co-creating learning material activity and also, four distinct patterns of collaboration were revealed by analyzing student activity. Even though students were in general satisfied with their collaboration, as they could suit the activity to their needs, those students who relied more on their group for help proved to be less satisfied by the communication among group members. In addition, the teacher and the audience evaluated positively the students’ performance as peer-tutors. This paper is an extended version of [1], presented at the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Natsis, A., Papadopoulos, P.M., Obwegeser, A.: Student groups as tutors in information systems education: students’ perspectives on collaboration and outcomes. In: McLaren, B.M., Costagliola, G., Uhomoibhi, J., Escudeiro, P., Zvacek, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education – Volume 2: CSEDU 2017, pp. 37–45, Porto, Portugal (2017)
McCulloch, A.: The student as co-producer: learning from public administration about the student–university relationship. Stud. High. Educ. 34(2), 171–183 (2009)
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P.: Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: implications for academic developers. Int. J. Acad. Dev. 16(2), 133–145 (2011)
Deeley, S.J., Bovill, C.: Staff student partnership in assessment: enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 42(3), 463–477 (2017)
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., Moore-Cherry, N.: Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. High. Educ. 71(2), 195–208 (2016)
Draper, S.W.: Catalytic assessment: understanding how MCQs and EVS can foster deep learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 40(2), 285–293 (2009)
Casey, M.M., Bates, S.P., Galloway, K.W., Galloway, R.K., Hardy, J.A., Kay, A.E., Kirsop, P., McQueen, H.A.: Scaffolding student engagement via online peer learning. Eur. J. Phys. 35(4), 045002 (2014)
Brew, A.: Teaching and research: new relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 22(1), 3–18 (2003)
Healey, M.: Linking research and teaching: exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. In: Barnett, R. (ed.), Reshaping the University: New Relationships between Research, Scholarship and Teaching, pp. 67–78. McGraw Hill/Open University Press (2005)
Jenkins, A., Lindsay, R., Brew, A.: Reshaping Teaching in Higher Education: Linking Teaching with Research. Routledge, London (2003)
Obwegeser, N., Papadopoulos, P.M.: Integrating research and teaching in the IS classroom: benefits for teachers and students. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 27(4), 249–258 (2016)
Griffiths, R.: Knowledge production and the research–teaching nexus: the case of the built environment disciplines. Stud. High. Educ. 29(6), 709–726 (2004)
Kolić-Vrhovec, S., Bajšanski, I., Zubković, B.R.: The role of reading strategies in scientific text comprehension and academic achievement of university students. Rev. Psychol. 18(2), 81–90 (2011)
McNamara, D.S., Ozuru, Y., Best, R., O’Reilly, T.: The 4-pronged comprehension strategy framework. In: McNamara, D.S. (ed.), Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies, pp. 465–496. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah (2007)
Eryilmaz, E., Thoms, B., Mary, J., Kim, R., Canelon, J.: Task oriented reading of instructional materials and its relationship to message scores in online learning conversations. In: Paper Presented at the 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (2016)
van der Pol, J., Admiraal, W., Simons, P.R.J.: The affordance of anchored discussion for the collaborative processing of academic texts. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. 1(3), 339–357 (2006)
Webb, N.M., Franke, M.L., De, T., Chan, A.G., Freund, D., Shein, P., Melkonian, D.K.: ‘Explain to your partner’: teachers’ instructional practices and students’ dialogue in small groups. Camb. J. Educ. 39(1), 49–70 (2009)
King, A.: Transactive peer tutoring: distributing cognition and metacognition. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 10(1), 57–74 (1998)
Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H.J.A., Mulder, M., Chizari, M.: Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL): a synthesis of 15 years of research. Educ. Res. Rev. 7(2), 79–106 (2012)
Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., Fischer, F.: Socio-cognitive scaffolding with computer-supported collaboration scripts: a meta-analysis. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 29(3), 477–511 (2016)
Solimeno, A., Mebane, M.E., Tomai, M., Francescato, D.: The influence of students and teachers characteristics on the efficacy of face-to-face and computer supported collaborative learning. Comput. Educ. 51(1), 109–128 (2008)
Pifarre, M., Cobos, R.: Promoting metacognitive skills through peer scaffolding in a CSCL environment. Int. J. Comput.-Suppor. Collab. Learn. 5(2), 237–253 (2010)
Kyza, E., Georgiou, Y., Hadjichambi, D., Hadjichambis, A.: Teacher framing, classroom collaboration scripts, and help-seeking and help-giving behaviors. In: Nikol Rummel, M.K., Nathan, M., Puntambekar, S. (eds.), To See the World and a Grain of Sand: Learning across Levels of Space, Time, and Scale: CSCL 2013 Conference Proceedings Volume 1-Full Papers & Symposia, pp. 272–279. International Society of the Learning Sciences (2013)
Dettori, G., Persico, D.: Detecting self-regulated learning in online communities by means of interaction analysis. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 1(1), 11–19 (2008)
Panadero, E., Kirschner, P.A., Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., Järvenoja, H.: How individual self-regulation affects group regulation and performance: a shared regulation intervention. Small Group Res. 46(4), 431–454 (2015)
Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., Mckeachie, W.J.: Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educ. Psychol. Meas. 53(3), 801–813 (1993)
Dillenbourg, P.: What do you mean by ‘collaborative learning’? In: Dillenbourg, P. (ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, pp. 1–19. Elsevier, Oxford (1999)
Acknowledgements
This work has been partially funded by a Starting Grant from AUFF (Aarhus Universitets Forskningsfond), titled “Innovative and Emerging Technologies in Education”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Natsis, A., Papadopoulos, P.M., Obwegeser, N. (2018). Students’ Perceptions on Co-creating Learning Material in Information Systems Education. In: Escudeiro, P., Costagliola, G., Zvacek, S., Uhomoibhi, J., McLaren, B. (eds) Computers Supported Education. CSEDU 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 865. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94640-5_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94640-5_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94639-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94640-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)