Advertisement

User Perceptions of Haptic Fidgets on Mobile Devices for Attention and Task Performance

Conference paper
  • 1.2k Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 776)

Abstract

Fidgeting, while primarily recognized as a distinguishing characteristic of neurodevelopmental conditions such as autism or ADHD, has also recently been recognized as a potential focus and attention aid for learning in traditional classroom environments. Everyone fidgets to greater or lesser extents, perhaps everyone can benefit from fidgeting aids to refocus attention. The recent explosion in popularity of fidgeting aids, such as fidget spinners, fidget cubes, and other toys highlights the broad appeal of these objects. Human-Computer Interaction researchers have taken an interest in the contributions of fidgeting to productivity. While these works connect the concepts of visual and motor stimulus as meaningful fidgets, little investigation has been done as to the potential contributions of haptic stimulus in digital fidgets. We designed and tested haptic mobile fidgets and compared their effects on task performance and user preference against the traditional spinner and no fidget apparatus.

Keywords

Assistive technology Haptic feedback Human factors Productivity Tactile interfaces 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research team would like to thank all the Autistic and Neurodivergent folks who supported this project in its early days of conception. Your messages of support and feedback were of great value. The first author would especially like to express gratitude to the research team for supporting this work of auto(autie)ethnography.

References

  1. 1.
    Neurodevelopmental Disorders. In: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. American Psychiatric Association (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gabriels, R.L., Cuccaro, M.L., Hill, D.E., Ivers, B.J., Goldson, E.: Repetitive behaviors in autism: relationships with associated clinical features. Res. Dev. Disabil. 26, 169–181 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Péter, Z., Oliphant, M.E., Fernandez, T.V.: Motor stereotypies: a pathophysiological review. Front. Neurosci. 11, 171 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sofronoff, K., Leslie, A., Brown, W.: Parent management training and asperger syndrome. Autism 8, 301–317 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Biel, L.: Fidget Toys or Focus Tools? Sens. Samrts. 12–13 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dackermann, T., Fischer, U., Nuerk, H.-C., Cress, U., Moeller, K.: Applying embodied cognition: from useful interventions and their theoretical underpinnings to practical applications. ZDM 49, 545–557 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daley, D., Birchwood, J.: ADHD and academic performance: Why does ADHD impact on academic performance and what can be done to support ADHD children in the classroom? (2010). http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01046.x
  8. 8.
    Friedlander, D.: Sam comes to school: including students with autism in your classroom. Clear. House A J. Educ. Strateg. Issues Ideas 82, 141–144 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ridgway, A., Northup, J., Pellegrin, A., LaRue, R., Hightsoe, A.: Effects of recess on the classroom behavior of children with and without attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Sch. Psychol. Q. 18, 253–268 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Silly Putty History. Crayola LLCGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zawitz, R.X.: About Tangle creations. https://www.tanglecreations.com/pages/about-us
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Fidget Cube: A vinyl desk toy by Matthew and Mark McLachlan—Kickstarter. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/antsylabs/fidget-cube-a-vinyl-desk-toy/updates
  15. 15.
    Cha, A.E.: America’s love-hate relationship with the fidget spinner: Is technology to blame for our restlessness? - The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2017/05/19/americas-love-hate-relationship-with-the-fidget-spinner-is-technology-to-blame-for-our-restlessness/
  16. 16.
    Roy, A.: The fidget spinners are banned in 32% of the largest high schools U.S. https://spinnerlist.com/pages/fidget-spinners-new-ban-study-2017
  17. 17.
    Choi, W., Song, A., Edge, D., Fukumoto, M., Lee, U.: Exploring user experiences of active workstations. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing – UbiComp 2016. pp. 805–816. ACM Press, New York, USA (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chalkley, J.D., Ranji, T.T., Westling, C.E.I., Chockalingam, N., Witchel, H.J.: Wearable sensor metric for fidgeting: screen engagement rather than interest causes NIMI of wrists and ankles. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Cognitive Ergononics 2017 - ECCE 2017, pp. 158–161 (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Karlesky, M., Isbister, K.: Fidget widgets: secondary playful interactions in support of primary serious tasks. In: CHI 2013 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems on CHI EA 2013. pp. 1149–1154. ACM Press, New York, USA (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karlesky, M., Isbister, K.: Designing for the physical margins of digital workspaces: fidget widgets in support of productivity and creativity. In: TEI 2014 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, pp. 13–20. ACM Press, New York, USA (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Isbister, K., Karlesky, M.: Embodied self-regulation with tangibles. In: Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded. Embodied Interaction (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karlesky, M., Isbister, K.: Understanding fidget widgets. In: Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction – NordiCHI 2016, pp. 1–10. ACM Press, New York, USA (2016)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Bravo, M.J., Nakayama, K.: The role of attention in different visual-search tasks. Percept. Psychophys. 51, 465–472 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eriksen, C.W., Schultz, D.W.: Information processing in visual search: a continuous flow conception and experimental results. Percept. Psychophys. 25, 249–263 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dykman, R.A., Ackerman, P.T., Oglesby, D.M.: Selective and sustained attention in hyperactive, learning-disabled, and normal boys. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 167, 288–297 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer Information Sciences and EngineeringHerbert Wertheim College of Engineering, University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations