An Immersive Environment for Experiential Training and Remote Control in Hazardous Industrial Tasks

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 795)


Inadequate training and lack of risk awareness are among the main causes of work-related accidents in manufacturing facilities and during hazardous tasks. In the last decade, Virtual Reality was introduced as an effective tool for improving individuals’ skills in their tasks in several different contexts by simulating operating scenarios. Nowadays, advances in interaction paradigms and novel devices create opportunities to further enhance training and work safety. In this paper, we introduce an immersive system based on affordable wearable devices for providing on-the-job training. In addition to its advantages for instructional purposes, we discuss the results of an experimental study about the performance of system as an assessment tool for evaluating the presence of incorrect movements that lead to work-related conditions.


Wearable Haptics Training Safety Industry 4.0 


  1. 1.
    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    UK Government Health and Safety Executive: Statistics on fatal injuries in the workplace in Great Britain (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burt, C.D.B.: New employee accident rates, pp. 9–22 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Breslin, F.C., Smith, P.: Trial by fire: a multivariate examination of the relation between job tenure and work injuries. Occup. Environ. Med. 63, 27–32 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Muggleton, J.M., Allen, R., Chappell, P.H.: Hand and arm injuries associated with repetitive manual work in industry: a review of disorders, risk factors and preventive measures. Ergonomics 42(5), 714–739 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bliss, J.P., Tidwell, P.D., Guest, M.A.: The effectiveness of virtual reality for administering spatial navigation training to firefighters. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 6(1), 73–86 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ragazzoni, L., Ingrassia, P.L., Echeverri, L., Maccapani, F., Berryman, L., Burkle, F.M., Della Corte, F.: Virtual reality simulation training for Ebola deployment. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 9(5), 543–546 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Wyk, E., De Villiers, R.: Virtual reality training applications for the mining industry. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Graphics, Virtual Reality, Visualisation and Interaction in Africa, pp. 53–63. ACM, February 2009Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Patel, R., Dennick, R.: Simulation based teaching in interventional radiology training: is it effective? Clin. Radiol. 72(3), 266-e7 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Renner, A., Holub, J., Sridhar, S., Evans, G., Winer, E.: A virtual reality application for additive manufacturing process training. In: ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. V01AT02A033–V01AT02A033. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, August 2015Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aguinas, H., Henle, C.A., Beaty Jr., J.C.: Virtual reality technology: a new tool for personnel selection. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 9(1–2), 70–83 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davis, M.C., Can, D.D., Pindrik, J., Rocque, B.G., Johnston, J.M.: Virtual interactive presence in global surgical education: international collaboration through augmented reality. World Neurosurg. 86, 103–111 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Muhanna, M.A.: Virtual reality and the CAVE: taxonomy, interaction challenges and research directions. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 27(3), 344–361 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ng, A.K., Chan, L.K., Lau, H.Y.: Corrective feedback for depth perception in CAVE-like systems. In: 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), pp. 293–294. IEEE, March 2017Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coburn, J.Q., Salmon, J.L., Freeman, I.: Effectiveness of an immersive virtual environment for collaboration with gesture support using low-cost hardware. J. Mech. Des. 140(4), 042001 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chang, T.P., Gerard, J., Pusic, M.V.: Screen-based simulation, virtual reality, and haptic simulators. In: Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Pediatrics, pp. 105–114. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhao, D., Lucas, J.: Virtual reality simulation for construction safety promotion. Int. J. Inj. Control Saf. Promot. 22(1), 57–67 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Caporusso, N., Biasi, L., Cinquepalmi, G., Trotta, G.F., Brunetti, A., Bevilacqua, V.: A wearable device supporting multiple touch-and gesture-based languages for the deaf-blind. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 32–41. Springer, Cham (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Taylor, K., Engsberg, J., Foreman, M.: Utility and usability of the MYO Gesture armband as a fine motor virtual reality gaming intervention. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 97(10), e125 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Polytechnic University of BariBariItaly
  2. 2.Fort Hays State UniversityHaysUSA

Personalised recommendations