Can Personal Activity Trackers Be Used to Provide Insight into Sit-to-Stand Workstation Usage and Benefits?

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 795)


We investigated whether activity trackers could be used to differentiate between sitting and standing at adjustable workstations and to determine if sit-to-stand workstation usage was associated with higher activity levels. A paired-t-test was used to assess the difference between the mean step counts measured using the activity trackers during sitting and standing periods among six office workers. Twelve office workers also wore activity trackers while self-reporting their standing as a percentage of total work time every week for six weeks. Spearman correlation was used to assess the relationship between standing percentage and step count. The difference in mean step count between sitting and standing was not statistically significant (p = 0.113) and the Spearman correlation between standing percentage and step count was weak (ρ = 0.301) and not statistically significant (p = 0.342). These findings suggest that basic activity trackers may not be useful in measuring sit-to-stand workstation usage.


Wearable technology Sit to stand workstations Activity tracking 



Two entities provided support for this research project. The National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health’s Montana Tech Training Program Grant (2016) and the Montana Tech of the University of Montana’s Faculty Development Grant Initiative (2016).


  1. 1.
    Chemi, E.: Here’s what happened when I wore 10 fitness trackers at once. Retrieved from CNBC, 7 June 2016.
  2. 2.
    Pronk, N.: Reducing occupational sitting time and improving worker health: the take-a-stand project. Prev. Chronic Dis. (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sarasohn-Kahn, J.: Heathcare IT news. Retrieved from wearable activity tracking device purchasing expected to grow 11 percent in 2016, 05 May 2016.
  4. 4.
    Sasaki, J., Hickey, A., Mavilia, M.: Validation of the fitbit wireless activty tracker for prediction of energy expendature. J. Phys. Act. Health 12(2), 149–154 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shrestha, N., Kukkonen-Harjula, K., Verbeek, J., Ijaz, S.: Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Simons, C., Hughes, L., Engeland, M., Goldbohm, R.: Physical activity, occupational sitting time, and colorectal cancer risk in the Netherlands cohort study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 177, 514–530 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Straker, L., Atherton, G., Dunstan, D.: Excessive occupational sitting is not a ‘safe system of work’: time for doctors to get chatting with patients. Med. J. Aust. 3, 138–140 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Safety, Health and Industrial Hygiene DepartmentMT TechButteUSA

Personalised recommendations