Abstract
OCRA (Occupational Repetitive Action) index is one of the most used method for supporting risk assessment in tasks requiring manual handling of low loads at high frequency. One of the main drawbacks of this method is that the operator analyses the activities by observing videos. This kind of procedure is inherently not objective and operator-dependent. To overcome these limitations, we developed a toolbox to support the analysis with contextual noting and wearable sensors kinematic data. Three expert operators were asked to evaluate seven videos with and without the aid of the developed toolbox. Results underlined a high inter (R2 mean 0.4) and intra-operator variability (posture time percentage and technical actions (TAs) count mean errors respectively 7.44%, 4 TAs) when using the only video-based approaches. On the contrary, research outcomes showed that the introduction of wearable device allow to overcome these issues and to reduce noticeably the evaluation time (−98%).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
ISO 11228:2007(E). Ergonomics - Manual handling, 01 April 2007
Colombini, D., Occhipinti, E.: L’Analisi e la gestione del rischio nel lavoro manuale ripetitivo: Manuale per l’uso del sistema OCRA per la gestione del rischio da sovraccarico biomeccanico in lavori semplici e complessi. Franco Angeli, Milano (2015)
McAtamney, L., Corlett, E.N.: RULA: a survey method for the investigation of world-related upper limb disorders. Appl. Ergon. 24, 91–99 (1993)
Spielholz, P., Silverstein, B., Morgan, M., Checkoway, H., Kaufman, J.: Comparison of self-report, video observation and direct measurement methods for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder physical risk factors. Ergonomics 44(6), 588–613 (2001)
David, G.C.: Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occup. Med. 55(3), 190–199 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lenzi, S.E., Standoli, C.E., Andreoni, G., Perego, P., Lopomo, N.F. (2019). Comparison Among Standard Method, Dedicated Toolbox and Kinematic-Based Approach in Assessing Risk of Developing Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Disorders. In: Ahram, T. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Wearable Technologies and Game Design. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 795. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94619-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94619-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94618-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94619-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)