Skip to main content

Comparison Among Standard Method, Dedicated Toolbox and Kinematic-Based Approach in Assessing Risk of Developing Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Disorders

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 795))

Abstract

OCRA (Occupational Repetitive Action) index is one of the most used method for supporting risk assessment in tasks requiring manual handling of low loads at high frequency. One of the main drawbacks of this method is that the operator analyses the activities by observing videos. This kind of procedure is inherently not objective and operator-dependent. To overcome these limitations, we developed a toolbox to support the analysis with contextual noting and wearable sensors kinematic data. Three expert operators were asked to evaluate seven videos with and without the aid of the developed toolbox. Results underlined a high inter (R2 mean 0.4) and intra-operator variability (posture time percentage and technical actions (TAs) count mean errors respectively 7.44%, 4 TAs) when using the only video-based approaches. On the contrary, research outcomes showed that the introduction of wearable device allow to overcome these issues and to reduce noticeably the evaluation time (−98%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ISO 11228:2007(E). Ergonomics - Manual handling, 01 April 2007

    Google Scholar 

  2. Colombini, D., Occhipinti, E.: L’Analisi e la gestione del rischio nel lavoro manuale ripetitivo: Manuale per l’uso del sistema OCRA per la gestione del rischio da sovraccarico biomeccanico in lavori semplici e complessi. Franco Angeli, Milano (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. McAtamney, L., Corlett, E.N.: RULA: a survey method for the investigation of world-related upper limb disorders. Appl. Ergon. 24, 91–99 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Spielholz, P., Silverstein, B., Morgan, M., Checkoway, H., Kaufman, J.: Comparison of self-report, video observation and direct measurement methods for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder physical risk factors. Ergonomics 44(6), 588–613 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. David, G.C.: Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occup. Med. 55(3), 190–199 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Elio Lenzi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lenzi, S.E., Standoli, C.E., Andreoni, G., Perego, P., Lopomo, N.F. (2019). Comparison Among Standard Method, Dedicated Toolbox and Kinematic-Based Approach in Assessing Risk of Developing Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Disorders. In: Ahram, T. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Wearable Technologies and Game Design. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 795. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94619-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94619-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94618-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94619-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics