Skip to main content

Obligation to Report and Normal Controls

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 397 Accesses

Abstract

There are no clear guidelines addressing whether a duty exists in a research-subject relationship to report child maltreatment and endangerment unveiled in research studies involving normal children. Researchers may have concerns about taking personal and professional risks by reporting suspected injury particularly if the researcher is not adequately trained in the area of abuse. Researchers may have concerns regarding the risk-benefit ratio of reporting, thresholds for reporting, and their own certainty about the information received. Researcher reporting may also be in conflict with ongoing child abuse interventions that are not known to the researcher. Research involving children and child endangerment relies upon children responding accurately to sensitive questions regarding abuse. If not, then data may be inaccurate or incomplete. There may also be obligations to forewarn parents/guardians that such information is being collected and what implications this may have in terms of reporting, intervention and protection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Finkelhor D. The prevention of childhood sexual abuse. Futur Child. 2009;19(2):169–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Finkelhor D, Turner H, Ormrod R, Hamby SL. Violence, abuse, and crime exposure in a national sample of children and youth. Pediatrics. 2009;124(5):1411–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. MacMillan HL, Fleming JE, Streiner DL, Lin E, Boyle MH, Jamieson E, et al. Childhood abuse and lifetime psychopathology in a community sample. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158(11):1878–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Becker-Blease KA, Freyd JJ. Research participants telling the truth about their lives: the ethics of asking and not asking about abuse. Am Psychol. 2006;61(3):218–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Amaya-Jackson L, Soclar RR, Hunter W, Runyan DK, Colindres R. Directly questioning children and adolescents about maltreatment: a review of survey measures used. J Interpers Violence. 2000;15(7):725–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Annas GJ. Confidentiality and the duty to warn. Hast Cent Rep. 1976;6(6):6–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Appelbaum PS, Rosenbaum A. Tarasoff and the researcher: does the duty to protect apply in a research setting? Am Psychol. 1989;44(6):885–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Endicott OR. Civil liability for failure to report child abuse. Child Abuse Negl. 1979;3(2):633–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sieber JE. Issues presented by mandatory reporting requirements to researchers of child abuse and neglect. Eth Behav. 1994;4(1):1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Knight ED, Runyan DK, Dubowitz H, Brandford C, Kotch J, Litrownik A, et al. Methodological and ethical challenges associated with child self-report of maltreatment: solutions implemented by the LongSCAN consortium. J Interpers Violence. 2000;15(7):760–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Black MM, Ponirakis A. Computer-administered interviews with children about maltreatment: methodological, developmental, and ethical issues. J Interpers Violence. 2000;15(7):682–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bok S. Secrets: on the ethics of concealment and revelation. 1st ed. New York: Pantheon Books; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bradley E, Lindsay R. Methodological and ethical issues in child abuse research. J Fam Viol. 1987;2(3):239–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Crenshaw WB, Lichtenberg JW. Child abuse and the limits of confidentiality: forewarning practices. Behav Sci Law. 1993;11:181–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Greenwald R, Ryan MK, Mulvihill J. Human subjects research: a handbook for institutional review boards. New York: Plenum Press; 1982.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Kinard E. Ethical issues in research with abused children. Child Abus Negl. 1985;9(3):301–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stanley B, Sieber J, editors. Social research on children and adolescents: ethical issues. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. King NM, Churchill LR. Ethical principles guiding research on child and adolescent subjects. J Interpers Violence. 2000;15(7):710–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Williamson E, Godenough T, Kent J, Ashcroft R. Conducting research with children: the limits of confidentiality and child protection protocols. Child Soc. 2005;19:397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Guttmann, K., Shouldice, M., Levin, A.V. (2019). Obligation to Report and Normal Controls. In: Ethical Issues in Child Abuse Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94586-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94586-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94585-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94586-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics