Abstract
General approaches of MCA may be used in many areas of decision-making processes. Chapter 4 showed its applications for data models of digital geoinformation and the evaluation of their functionality. The following text is dedicated to the use of MCA for solutions of geo-process models. To illustrate the complexity of the method of solution, an example of modelling of passing through terrain with off-road vehicles was chosen.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alvin, R. B., & Haley, P. W. (1992). NATO reference mobility model, Edition II, NRMM II users guide (Technical Report GL-92-19 ed.). Vickburg, USA: Department of the Army-Waterways Experimental Station, Corps of Engineers.
ArcGIS. (2015). ArcGISHelp. Retrieved from www.esri.com.
CMeS. (2017). Meteorological dictionary (Meteorologický slovník—In Czech). Retrieved 03 2018, from Meteorologický slovník výkladový a terminologický: http://slovnik.cmes.cz/.
CUZK. (2017). Geoportal CUZK. Retrieved from WMService—WMS—Ortofoto: http://geoportal.cuzk.cz/WMS_ORTOFOTO_PUB/WMService.aspx?.
CUZK. (2018). (State Administration of Land Surveying and Cadastre, Land Survey Office) Retrieved 10 2017, from Geoportal CUZK—Access to map products and services: http://geoportal.cuzk.cz/.
D’Amico, P., Di Martino, F., & Sessa, S. (2013). A GIS as a decision support system for planning sustainable mobility in a case-study. In A. Ventre, A. Maturo, S. Hoskova-Mayerova, & J. Kacprzyk (Eds.), Multicriteria and multiagend decision making with applications to economics and social sciences (Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ed., pp. 115–128). Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
De Felice, F., & Petrillo, A. (2013). Decision making analysis to improve public participation in stategic energy production management. In A. Ventre, A. Maturo, S. Hoskova-Mayerova, & J. Kacprzyk (Eds.), Multicriteria and multiagend decision making with applications to economics and social sciences (Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ed., pp. 129–142). Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag.
Di Martino, F., & Sessa, S. (2011). Spatial analysis and fuzzy relation equations. Advances in Fuzzy Systems, 2011, p. 14, Article ID 429498.
Esri. (2013). ArcGIS User documentation. Copyright © 1995–2013 Esri.
Hofmann, A., Hoskova-Mayerova, S., & Talhofer, V. (2013). Usage of fuzzy spatial theory for modelling of terrain passability. Advances in Fuzzy Systems, 2013, p. 13, Article ID 506406.
Hoskova-Mayerova, S., Hubacek, M., Bekesiene, S., & Bures, M. (2017). Vehicle movement modelling possibilities for defense and crisis management. In M. Čepin &. R. Briš (Eds.), Safety and reliability—Theory and applications (pp. 3035–3039). London: Taylor & Francis Group.
Hošková-Mayerová, Š., Talhofer, V., & Hofmann, A. (2013). Decision-making process with respect to the reliability of geo-database. In A. G. Ventre, A. Maturo, Š. Hošková-Mayerová, & J. Kacprzyk (Eds.), Multicriteria and multiagent decision making with applications to economics and social sciences (Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ed., pp. 179–195). Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Hubacek, M. (2011). Geoinformatics in support of simulators training. In Proceedings of 19th International Conference Geography and Geoinformatics: Challenge for Practise and Education (pp. 419–426). Brno: Masaryk University, Faculty of Education.
Hubacek, M., Almasiova, L., Brenova, M., Bures, M., & Mertova, E. (2016). Assessing quality of soil maps and possibilities of their use for computing vehicle mobility. In Central Europe area in view of current geography (pp. 99–110). Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
Jayakumar, P., & Dasch, J. (2016). The Next Generation NATO Reference mobility model development. NATO Public Release documents, 22. Retrieved from https://www.sto.nato.int/publications/pages/results.aspx?k=NG%20NRMM&s=Search%20All%20STO%20Reports.
JPL, N. (2015). Shuttle radar topography mission. Retrieved from NASA—Jet Propulsion Laboratory: http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/.
Kainz, W. (2007). Fuzzy logic and GIS. Vienna, Austria: University of Vienna.
Mitchell, A. (1999). The ESRI guide to GIS analysis. Redlands: ESRI Press.
MoD-GeoS. (2010). Catalogue of the topographic objects DMU25 (7.3 ed.). Dobruska: Ministry of Defence of the Czech Republic, Geographic Service.
NDMC. (2017). National Drought Mitigation Center. Retrieved 03 2018, from National Drought Mitigation Center Website: http://drought.unl.edu/DroughtBasics/TypesofDrought.aspx.
Novák, P. (2000). Soil database (Účelová databáze PŮDY, Příručka uživatele—In Czech). Praha: Vojenský zeměpisný ústav.
Pokonieczny, K., & Mościcka, A. (2018). The influence of the shape and size of the cell on developing military passability maps. Cartography and Geographic Information Science.
Rybansky, M. (2009). Cross-country movement, the impact and evaluation of geographic factors (1st ed.). Brno, Czech Republic: Akademické nakladatelství CERM, s.r.o. Brno.
Rybansky, M., Hofmann, A., Hubacek, M., Kovarik, V., & Talhofer, V. (2015, November). Modelling of cross-country transport in raster format. Environmental Earth Sciences, 74(10), 7049–7058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4759-y.
Rybansky, M., & Vala, M. (2009). Analysis of relief impact on transport during crisis situations. Moravian Geographical Reports, 17(3), 19–26.
Rybansky, M., & Vala, M. (2010). Relief impact on transport. In: ICMT’09: International Conference on Military Technologies (pp. 551–559). Brno: University of Defence.
Schmid, S., Galicz, E., & Reinhardt, W. (2015). WMS performance of selected SQL and NoSQL databases. In International Conference on Military Technologies (ICMT 2015) (pp. 311–316). Brno: University of Defence.
STANAG 2999. (2012). Use of helicopters in land operations doctrine (9th ed.). Brussels: NATO Standardization Agency (MAS).
Svatonova, H., & Rybansky, M. (2014). Visualization of landscape changes and threatening environmental processes using a digital landscape model. IOP Conference Series: Earth Environment Science, 18, 12–18. IOP science.
Talhofer, V. (2004). Digital geographic data: Potential evaluation. In AGILE 2004, 7th Conference on Geographic Information Science, Conference Proceedings (pp. 675 – 686). Heraclion, Crete, Greece: AGILE.
Talhofer, V., Hoskova, S., Hofmann, A., & Kratochvil, V. (2009). The system of the evaluation of integrated digital spatial data realibility. In 6th Conference on Mathematics and Physics at Technical Universities (pp. 281–288). Brno: University of Defence.
TIFP. (2015). Technical Institute of Fire Protection (in Czech). (Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic) Retrieved 02 2018, from Fire Rescue Service of the Czech Republic: http://www.hzscr.cz/hasicien/default.aspx.
Veregin, H. (1999). Data quality parameter. In P. A. Longley (Ed.), Geographic information system (2nd ed., pp. 179–189). New York: Wiley.
VGHMÚř. (2015). Katalog topografických objektů DMÚ25. Vydání 04 2015. Dobruška: Vojenský geografický a hydrometeorologický úřad (in Czech).
VTUPV. (2010). The Military Technical Institute of Ground Forces. (The Military Technical Institute) Retrieved 01 2018, from The Military Technical Institute: http://www.vtusp.cz/en/.
Zadeh, I. (1965). Fuzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Talhofer, V., Hošková-Mayerová, Š., Hofmann, A. (2019). The Use of MCA in Decision-Making Processes on an Example of Terrain Passability Model. In: Quality of Spatial Data in Command and Control System. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 168. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94562-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94562-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94561-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94562-0
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)