Skip to main content

Postscript on Ontology and Economics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Economic Objects and the Objects of Economics

Part of the book series: Virtues and Economics ((VIEC,volume 3))

Abstract

The proper domain of the discipline of economics then is the study of the ways and means with which individuals and groups decide what they should do to secure the material conditions of a worthwhile life. The requirement that the application of the theory must result in bringing about a worthwhile life rather than the maximisation or optimisation of any single issue also means that its tenets should be open to critical assessment on the basis of incommensurable considerations. Theories that lead to the degradation of human dignity or the environment will not do even if they satisfy the criteria of some algorithm. They are inadaquate not only because they are morally objectionable, but, more broadly, because they are ontologically deficient, that is to say, they fail to set out an adaquate picture of human reality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berlin, I. 1996. The Sense of Reality. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, É. 1895. Les regles de la mĂ©thode sociologique. In Emile Durkheim Selected Writings, 1972, ed. A. Giddens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, G. 1996. La MathĂ©matisation du Reel. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. 1971. Anti-Equilibrium. Fairfield: Augustus M. Kelley, Publishers (1991 reprint).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 2007. After Virtue. University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meikle, S. 1995. Aristotle’s economic thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. 1893. A system of logic (Book lV, Chapter 3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Ch. 1985. Self-interpreting animals. In Human agency and language, philosophical papers, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Winch, P. 1958. The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. London, Routledge: Keegan Paul, Ltd, Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter RĂ³na .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

RĂ³na, P. (2018). Postscript on Ontology and Economics. In: RĂ³na, P., Zsolnai, L. (eds) Economic Objects and the Objects of Economics. Virtues and Economics, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94529-3_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics