Advertisement

Telemedicine Collaboration in Cancer Treatment: A Case Study at Brazilian National Cancer Institute

  • Antônio Augusto GonçalvesEmail author
  • Carlos Henrique Fernandes Martins
  • José Geraldo Pereira Barbosa
  • Sandro Luís Freire de Castro Silva
  • Cezar Cheng
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10898)

Abstract

Brazil presents a complex scenario in cancer treatment. The occurrences have been growing around 600.000 new cases every year. The development of telemedicine has been a priority to INCA and its importance to the delivery of healthcare services in Brazil is huge. The PACS’ deployment allied with the creation of a national network of cancer care institutions were the priorities of INCA’s telemedicine project. This environment can remove communication barriers and ensure better collaboration among physicians across the country. The purpose of this article was to study the telemedicine adoption by physicians. The implementation of telemedicine can be considered as a type of disruptive innovation which changes radically the doctor-patient relationship.

Keywords

Telemedicine Telemedicine collaboration 

References

  1. 1.
    Doumbouya, M.B., Kamsu-Foguem, B., Kenfack, H., Foguem, C.: A framework for decision making on teleexpertise with traceability of the reasoning. IRBM 36(1), 40–51 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    O’Brien, D.M., Kaluzny, D.A., Sheps, G.C.: The role of a public-private partnership: translating science to improve cancer care in the community. J. Healthc. Manag. 59(1), 17–29 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bardhan, I.R., Thouin, M.F.: Health information technology and its impact on the quality and cost of healthcare delivery. Decis. Support Syst. 55(2), 438–449 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    WHO, a health telematics policy – Report 11–16 December Geneva (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Risto, R., Arto, O., David, H.: Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature. CMAJ 165(6), 765–771 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kamsu-Foguem, B.K., Tiako, P., Tiako, F., Fotso, L.P., Foguem, C.: Modeling for effective collaboration in telemedicine. Telemat. Inf. 32(4), 776–786 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simon, P., Pellitteri, W.: Le décret français de télémédecine: une garantie pour les médecins. Eur. Res. Telemed. 1(2), 70–75 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vlmarlund, V., Le Rouge, C.: Barriers and opportunities to the widespread adoption of telemedicine: a big-country evaluation. Stud. Health Technol. Inf. 192, 933 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thakur, R., Hsu, S.H.Y., Fontenot, G.: Innovation in healthcare: issues and future trends. J. Bus. Res. 65(4), 562–569 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Damanpour, F.: 270 J. Daniel Wischnevsky. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 23, 269–291 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frambach, R.T., Schillewaert, N.: J. Bus. Res. 55, 163–176 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Armfield, N.R., Edirippulige, S.K., Bradford, N., Smitha, C.: Telemedicine is the cart being put before the horse? Med. J. Aust. 200(9), 530–533 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thakur, et al.: J. Bus. Res. 65 562–569 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Agha, Z., Schapira, R.M., Laud, P.W., Mcnutt, G., Roter, D.L.: Patient satisfaction with physician-patient communication during telemedicine. Telemed. J. EHealth Off. J. Am. Telemed. Assoc. 15(9), 830e839 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    den Berg, Van, Schumann, M., Kraft, K., Hoffmann, W.: Telemedicine and telecare for older patients—a systematic review. Maturitas 73(2), 94–114 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goldblatt, E.M., Lee, W.-H.: From bench to bedside: the growing use of translational research in cancer medicine. Am. J. Trans. Res. 2(1), 1–18 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cooper, D.R., Schindler, P.S.: Métodos de pesquisa em administração, 7a edn. Bookman, Porto Alegre (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Argyris, C., Putnam, R., Smith, D.M.: Action science: action science concepts, methods and skills for research and intervention. Jossey Bass, Nova York (1985)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Queiroz, D.T., Vall, J., Souza, J.M.A., Vieira, N.F.C.: Observação participante na pesquisa qualitativa: Conceitos e aplicações na área de saúde. Revista de Enfermagem da UERJ 15(2), 276–283 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rho, M.J., Choi, I.Y., Lee, J.: Predictive factors of telemedicine service acceptance and behavioral intention of physicians. Int. J. Med. Inf. 83, 559–571 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antônio Augusto Gonçalves
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Carlos Henrique Fernandes Martins
    • 1
  • José Geraldo Pereira Barbosa
    • 2
  • Sandro Luís Freire de Castro Silva
    • 1
  • Cezar Cheng
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto Nacional do Câncer - COAE Tecnologia da InformaçãoRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Universidade Estácio de Sá - MADERio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations