Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethics and Ethical Dilemmas with Photovoice and Participatory Action Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Photovoice Handbook for Social Workers

  • 1776 Accesses

Abstract

Central to this chapter are the concepts of research and procedural ethics. Because Photovoice research focusses so closely on creating egalitarian, participatory processes and the implications of participant generated knowledge, rarely is enough time spent considering the potential ethical challenges inherent in participatory action research. Thinking about ethics early when using Photovoice is beneficial as the process can positively contribute to the design, procedures and outcomes of a project. Yet, the relationship between ethics, feminist participatory research and radical social work is a contested space meriting further discussion. The chapter begins with a brief history of research ethics and discusses the concept of feminist relational ethics. This discussion is extended to consider the potential for distress researcher and participant, the raising of false hopes, the risks of speaking for others and matters of (self)representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A recent example is the furore over a ‘debate’ held on breakfast television in Australia about the needs of Aboriginal children. With the discussion held with 3 white, middle class journalists, every ethical principle of journalism was breached in less than 5 minutes. For more see https://www.sbs.com.au/nitv/article/2018/03/13/why-are-white-people-sunrise-no-experience-calling-indigenous-child-removals.

  2. 2.

    In the Appendices you can find templates for a participant information sheet, a consent form and an image release from.

  3. 3.

    The stand out exception to this, is the book by Derek Clifford and Beverley Burke, Anti-oppressive Ethics and Values in Social Work.

Useful Resources

References

  • Brandt, B. (1978). Racism and research: The case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. The Hastings Centre Report, 8(6), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. (2017, May 16). ‘You’ve got bad blood’: The horror of the Tuskegee syphilis experiment. Retrieved March 11, 2018, from The Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2017/05/16/youve-got-bad-blood-the-horror-of-the-tuskegee-syphilis-experiment/?utm_term=.3440aa46a861.

  • Brown, L., & Strega, S. (2005). Transgressive possibilities. In L. Brown & S. Strega (Eds.), Research as resistance: Critical, indigenous and anti-oppressive approaches (pp. 1–18). Toronto: Canadian Scholar’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butot, M. (2004). Love as emancipatory praxis: An exploration of practitioners’ conceptualisations of love in critical social work practice (Master’s Thesis). University of Victoria, Victoria, BC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2002). Stories and silences: Disclosures and self in chronic illness. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(3), 302–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, D., & Burke, B. (2009). Anti-oppressive ethics and values in social work. Basingstoke and Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congress, E., & McAuliffe, D. (2006). Social work ethics: Professional codes in Australia and the United States. International Social Work, 49(2), 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creighton, G., Oliffe, J., Ferlatte, O., Bottorff, J., Broom, A., & Jenkins, E. (2018). Photovoice ethics: Critical reflections from men’s mental health research. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3), 446–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davys, A., & Beddoe, L. (2010). Best practice in professional supervision: A guide for the helping professions. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, I., & Woodward, R. (2009). Radical social work in practice: Making a difference. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, I., Ioakimidis, V., & Lavalette, M. (2018). Global social work in a political context: Radical perspectives. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, H., & Jarldorn, M. (2015). Narrative research and resistance: A cautionary tale. In S. Strega & L. Brown (Eds.), Research as resistance: Revisiting critical, indigenous and anti-oppressive appraoches (2nd ed., pp. 153–175). Toronto: Canadian Scholar’s Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales-Prendes, A. (2011). Dissonance between personal and professional values: Resolution of an ethical dilemma. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 8(2), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, M. (2007). There are no answers only choices: Teaching ethical decision making in social work. Australian Social Work, 60(2), 222–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gringeri, C., Wahab, S., & Anderson-Nathe, B. (2010). What makes it feminist? Mapping the landscape of feminist social work research. Affilia, 25(4), 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, D., & Brunger, F. (2014). Ethics, “vulnerability”, and feminist participatory action research with a disability community. Qualitiative Health Research, 24(7), 997–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallowell, L., Lawton, J., & Gregory, S. (2005). Reflections on research: The realities of doing research in the social sciences. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, A. (2012). Picturing reality: Power, ethics, and politics in using Photovoice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), 320–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtby, A., Klein, K., Cook, K., & Travers, R. (2015). To be seen or not to be seen: Photovoice, queer and trans youth, and the dilemma of representation. Action Research, 13(4), 317–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarldorn, M. (2014). The politics of research ethics in social work: Reflections from a first time researcher. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 11(2), 52–60. Available at http://jswve.org/download/2014/articles/52-JSWVE-11-2-The-Politics-of-Research-Ethics-in-Social-Work.pdf.

  • Jarldorn, M. (2016). Picturing creative approaches to social work research: Using photography to promote social change. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 28(4), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarldorn, M. (2018). Radically rethinking imprisonment: A Photovoice exploration of life in and after prison in South Australia. Doctoral thesis, Flinders University, South Australia. Available at https://theses.flinders.edu.au/view/90c3de9e-5a3f-4f64-8cc2-353aafdf04b7/1.

  • Johnston, G. (2016). Champions for social change: Photovoice ethics in practice and ‘false hopes’ for policy and social change. Global Public Health, 11(5–6), 799–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2016.1170176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. (1993). Bad blood: The Tuskegee syphilis experiment. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKendrick, D., & Webb, S. (2014). Taking a political stance in social work. Critical and Radical Social Work, 2(3), 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Z. (2007). “Feeling heavy”: Vicarious trauma and other issues facing those who work in the sexual assault field. Melbourne: Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault, Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHMRC. (2007). National statement on ethical conduct in human research. National Health and Medical Research Council. Updated May, 2015. Available at https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/e72.

  • Patil, T., & Ennis, G. (2018). Critically reflecting on the Australian Association of Social Workers Code of Ethics: Learning from a social work field placement. The British Journal of Social Work (Online First). https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx101.

  • Pitt, P. (2014). ‘The project cannot be approved in its current form’: Feminist visual research meets the Human Research Ethics Committee. Australian Education Research, 41, 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quixley, S., & Doostkhah, S. (2007). Conservatising youth work? Dangers of adopting a code of ethics. Retrieved March 31, 2018, from Youth Affairs Network Queensland. Available at http://www.yanq.org.au/uploads/1/4/1/7/14174316/conservatising_youth_work.pdf.

  • Regehr, C., & Antle, B. (1997). Coercive influences: Informed consent in court-mandated social work practice. Social Work, 42(3), 300–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rippey-Massat, C., & Lundy, M. (1997). Empowering research particpants. Affilia, 12(1), 33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto, I., & Pitner, R. (2005). Use of critical consciousness in anti-oppressive social work practice: Disentangling power dynamics at personal and structural levels. British Journal of Social Work, 35(4), 425–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, S., Olansky, S., Rivers, E., Smith, C., & Rambo, D. (1955). Untreated syphilis in the male Negro: Background and current status of patients in the Tuskegee study. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 2(5), 543–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Pitts, M. (2007). Researching the margins: An introduction. In M. Pitts & A. Smith (Eds.), Researching the margins: Strategies for ethical and vigorous research with marginalised communities (pp. 3–44). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, P., & Piper, H. (2010). Ethical research, academic freedom and the role of ethics committees and review procedures in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 33(3), 205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, C. (2016). Different lenses: Navigating ethics in cross-cultural research using Photovoice. In D. Warr, M. Guillemin, S. Cox, & J. Waycott (Eds.), Ethics and visual research methods: Theory, methodology and practice (pp. 19–30). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. (1999). Photovoice: A participatory action research strategy applied to women’s health. Journal of Women’s Health, 8(2), 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., & Burris, M. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health, Education & Behaviour, 24(3), 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., & Redwood-Jones, Y. (2001). Photovoice ethics: Perspectives from Flint Photovoice. Health Education & Behavior, 28(5), 560–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, D., Guillemin, M., Cox, S., & Waycott, J. (2016). Ethical issues in visual research and the value of stories. In D. Warr, S. Cox, M. Guillemin, & J. Waycott (Eds.), Ethics and visual research methods: Theory, methodology, and practice (pp. 1–16). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, M., & Campbell, C. (2014). From codes to contextual collaborations: Shifting the thinking about ethics in social work. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 25(1), 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkworth, G., McArthur, M., Layton, M., & Thompson, L. (2010). Someone to check in on me: Social capital, social support and vulnerable parents with very young children in the Australian Capital Territory. Child and Family Social Work, 15(2), 206–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

    Michele Jarldorn

Authors
  1. Michele Jarldorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Jarldorn .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jarldorn, M. (2019). Ethics and Ethical Dilemmas with Photovoice and Participatory Action Research. In: Photovoice Handbook for Social Workers. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94511-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94511-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94510-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94511-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation