Skip to main content

‘Gone Native?’: Reflections of a Feminist Tightrope Walker’s Research on ‘Land Grabbing’ and the Dilemmas of ‘Fieldworking’ While Parenting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Women Researching in Africa

Abstract

In this chapter, Dieng ‘returns home’ to do research by drawing on Goffman’s dramaturgical analysis approach for a metaphor of fieldwork and by questioning inherited research methodologies. She analyses the challenges of conducting decolonial and feminist research, before focusing on many dilemmas of ‘fieldworking’ at home, as a woman with a baby. Dieng, a feminist ‘tightrope walker’ trying not to ‘go native,’ explores how multiple identities, gender of the researcher and the genealogy of the research topic influenced the research and vice versa. As both ‘insider’ and ‘outsider,’ the research was facilitated more by being perceived as a ‘courageous mother’ than a ‘foreign’ researcher in a society that attributes special places to mothers but not young women questioning power relations, states and companies’ land deals, and more importantly, the gender of power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abu-Lughod, L. 1993. Writing Women’s Worlds: Bedouin Stories. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Lughod, L. 1999. Veiled Sentiments: Honor and Poetry in a Bedouin Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aidoo, A. 1992. The African Woman Today. Dissent, Summer, 319–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J., M. Keulertz, S. Sojamo, and J. Warner (eds.). 2013. Handbook of Land and Water Grabs in Africa: Foreign Direct Investment and Food and Water Security. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amadiume, I. 1997. The Mouth that Spoke a Falsehood Will Later Speak the Truth: Going Home to the Field in Eastern Nigeria. In Gendered Fields: Women, Men and Ethnography, ed. D. Bell, P. Caplan, and W.J. Karim. London: Routledge. Originally published in 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ampofo, A., J. Beoku-Betts, and M. Osirim. 2008. Researching African Women and Gender Studies: New Social Science Perspectives. African and Asian Studies 7: 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behar, R. 1993. Translated Woman: Crossing the Border with Esperanza’s Story. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J., R. Meinzen-Dick, and A. Quisumbing. 2012. The Gender Implications of Large-Scale Land Deals. Journal of Peasant Studies 39: 49–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.652621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, H. 2010. Class Dynamics of Agrarian Change. Halifax, NS and Sterling, VA: Fernwood Publishing and Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breman, J. 1985. Between Accumulation and Immiseration: The Partiality of Fieldwork in Rural India. Journal of Peasant Studies 13: 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066158508438281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A. 2017. Decolonising Gender and Development. http://www.ids.ac.uk/events/decolonising-gender-and-development.

  • Collins, P.H. 2004. Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought. In The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies, ed. S. Harding. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotula, L. 2013. The Great African Land Grab?: Agricultural Investments and the Global Food System. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, C., D. Johnston, C. Oya, and J. Sender. 2015. Research Note: Mistakes, Crises, and Research Independence: The Perils of Fieldwork as a Form of Evidence. African Affairs 115 (458): 145–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crehan, K. 1991. Listening to Different Voices. In From the Female Eye: Accounts of Women Field Workers Studying Their Own Communities, ed. M.N. Panini, 99–106. Delhi: Hindustan Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D.A., and C. Graven. 2016. Feminist Ethnography: Thinking Through Methodologies, Challenges and Possibilities. London and New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deane, K., and S. Stevano. 2016. Towards a Political Economy of the Use of Research Assistants: Reflections from Fieldwork in Tanzania and Mozambique. Qualitative Research 16 (2): 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, Mary Jo. 2014. Goffman on Gender, Sexism, and Feminism: A Summary of Notes on a Conversation with Erving Goffman and My Reflections Then and Now. Symbolic Interaction 37 (1): 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doss, C., G. Summerfield, and D. Tsikata. 2014. Land, Gender, and Food Security. Feminist Economics 20: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2014.89502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M., C. Oya, and S. Borras. 2015. Global Land Grabs: History, Theory and Method. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, M. 2002. Feminisms and Cross-Ideological Feminist Social Research: Standpoint, Situatedness and Positionality—Developing Cross-Ideological Feminist Research. Journal of International Women’s Studies 3 (2): 38–50. Available at http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol3/iss2/3.

  • Gilfoy, K. 2015. Land Grabbing and NGO Advocacy in Liberia: A Deconstruction of the “Homogeneous Community”. Available at http://afraf.oxfordjournals.org/content/114/455/185.abstract. Accessed 13 May 2016.

  • Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday. Available at: http://www.sociosite.net/sociologists/texts/goffman_self.php.

  • Golde, P. (ed.). 1970. Women in the Field: Anthropological Experiences. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R., I. Scoones, and D. Tsikata (eds.). 2015. Africa’s Land Rush: Rural Livelihoods and Agrarian Change. Woodbridge, Suffolk, UK: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss, J. 2002. The Case for Cross-Disciplinary Approaches in International Development. World Development 30 (3): 487–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Land Coalition (ILC). 2011. Tirana Declaration: Securing Land Access for the Poor in Times of Intensified Natural Resources Competition. ILC International Conference and Assembly of Members Tirana, Albania, 24–27, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jok, M.J. 2001. War and Slavery in Sudan. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaag, M., and A. Zoomers. 2014. The Global Land Grab: Beyond the Hype. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing; London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachingwe, Nancy. 2012. From Under Their Feet: A Think Piece on the Gender Dimensions of Land Grabs in Africa. Johannesburg: ActionAid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, U. 2005. A Radical History of Development Studies. Individuals, Institutionals and Ideologies. London and New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, J., and I. Faye. 2012. Land Grabs, Women’s Farming, and Women’s Activism in Africa. In International Conference on Global Land Grabbing II. Land Deals Political Initiative, Department of Development Sociology, Cornell University, 17–19 October, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mama, A. 2011. What Does It Mean to do Feminist Research in African Contexts? Feminist Review Proceedings Conference. http://nigs.ufsc.br/files/2017/07/fr201122a-AMINA-MAMA-Feminist-Research-in-Africa.pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martiniello, G. 2015. Social Struggles in Uganda’s Acholiland: Understanding Responses and Resistance to Amuru Sugar Works. Journal Peasant Studies 42: 653–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2015.1032269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayoux, L. 2001. Qualitative Methods. Tool Box Resour. EDIAIS. http://library.uniteddiversity.coop/Measuring_Progress_and_Eco_Footprinting/QualMethods.pdf.

  • Mbembe, A. 2015. Decolonizing Knowledge and the Question of the Archive. https://wiser.wits.ac.za/system/files/Achille%20Mbembe%20-%20Decolonizing%20Knowledge%20and%20the%20Question%20of%20the%20Archive.pdf.

  • Mbilinyi, M. 2017. Debating Land and Agrarian Issues from a Gender Perspective. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy 5 (2–3): 164–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mies, M. 1982. Fighting on Two Fronts: Women’s Struggles and Research. The Hague: Institute of Social Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mies, M. 1983. Towards a Methodology for Feminist Research? In Theories of Women’s Studies, ed. G. Bowles and R. Klein, 121–122. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, C.T. 1991. Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. In Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity, ed. C.T. Mohanty, 17–42. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, S., P. Yeros, and P. Jha. 2012. Imperialism and Primitive Accumulation: Notes on the New Scramble for Africa. Agrarian South Journal of Political Economy 1 (2): 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/227797601200100203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndlovu-Gatsheni, Sabelo J. 2014. Why Decoloniality in the 21st Century? The Thinker for Thought Leaders. http://www.thethinker.co.za/resources/48%20Thinker%20full%20mag.pdf.

  • Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. 2017. Decolonising Research Methodology Must Include Undoing Its Dirty History. http://theconversation.com/decolonising-research-methodology-must-include-undoing-its-dirty-history-83912.

  • Oya, C. 2013. The Land Rush and Classic Agrarian Questions of Capital and Labour: A Systematic Scoping Review of the Socioeconomic Impact of Land Grabs in Africa. Third World Quarterly 34: 1532–1557. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.843855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panini, M. (ed.). 1991. From the Female Eye: Accounts of Women Field Workers Studying Their Own Communities. Delhi: Hindustan Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. 2001 [1944]. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time [Electronic Resource]. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutazibwa, O. 2017. On Babies and Bathwater: Decolonising International Development Studies. https://www.ids.ac.uk/events/on-babies-and-bathwater-decolonising-international-development-studies.

  • Sarr, F. 2016. Afrotopia. Paris: Philippe Rey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London and New York: Zed Books Ltd.; Dunedin: University of Otago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tsikata, D. 2009. Gender, Land and Labour Relations and Livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa in the Era of Economic Liberalisation: Towards a Research Agenda. Feminist Africa 12: 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsikata, D., and J.A. Yaro. 2014. When a Good Business Model Is Not Enough: Land Transactions and Gendered Livelihood Prospects in Rural Ghana. Feminist Economics 20: 202–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2013.866261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuhiwai-Smith, L. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London and New York: Zed Books Ltd.; Dunedin: University of Otago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Broeck, G., and M. Maertens. 2017. Does Off-Farm Wage Employment Make Women in Rural Senegal Happy? Feminist Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2017.1338834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Carol A.B. 1988. Gender Issues in Field Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, Candace. 2016. Goffman in Feminist Perspective. Sociological Perspectives 39 (3): 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, B., S.M. Borras Jr., R. Hall, I. Scoones, and W. Wolford. 2012. The New Enclosures: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Land Deals. Journal of Peasant Studies 39: 619–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.691879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, D. (ed.). 1996. Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork. Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rama Salla Dieng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dieng, R.S. (2019). ‘Gone Native?’: Reflections of a Feminist Tightrope Walker’s Research on ‘Land Grabbing’ and the Dilemmas of ‘Fieldworking’ While Parenting. In: Jackson, R., Kelly, M. (eds) Women Researching in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94502-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94502-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94501-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94502-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics