Abstract
This study focuses on the effect of body armor fit on encumbered anthropometry relative to increased bulk and overall protection coverage versus exposure. Forty male active duty military personnel were measured in five body armor configurations including: Semi-Nude, duty uniform (Baseline), Initial fit, Increased and Decreased size. In general, as the size of the body armor system decreased, so did the bulk. As assumed, bulk was the smallest for the Decreased size, followed by the Initial size, then by the Increased size. In opposition to the study assumption, exposed areas were the smallest in the Decreased configuration around the neck and the under arm. The results suggest that wearing a one size smaller body armor system may provide better protection at vulnerable locations such as at the neck and underarms due to reduced gapping/space in these regions with smaller bulk.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Paquette, S.P., Case, H.W., Annis, J.F., Mayfield, T.L., Kristensen, S., Mountjoy, D.N.: The effects of multilayered military clothing ensembles on body size: a pilot study. Technical report (TR-99012). U.S. Army Soldier and Biological Chemical Command, Soldier Systems Center, Natick, MA (1999)
Garlie, T.N., Choi, HJ.: Characterizing the size of the encumbered soldier, NATICK/TR14/019. Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center (NSRDEC), Natick, MA (2014)
Mitchell, K.B., Garlie, T.N., Choi, HJ.: Anthropometry and range of motion (ROM) of the encumbered Soldier, NATICK/TR-17/010. Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center (NSRDEC), Natick, MA (2017)
Choi, H.J., Mitchell, K.B., Garlie, T.N., McNamara, J., Hennessy, E., Carson, J.: Effects of body armor fit on marksmanship performance. In: Goonetilleke, R., Karwowski, W. (eds.) Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 489, July 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41694-6_35
Headquarters, Department of the Army, Army demographics: FY15 Army Profile, September 2015
Gordon, C.C., Blackwell, C.L., Bradtmiller B., Parham, J.L., Barrientos, P., Paquette, S.P., Corner, B.D., Carson, J.M., Venezia, J.C., Rockwell, B.M., Mucher, M., Kristensen, S.: 2010–2012 Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Personnel: Methods and Summary Statistics. Technical Report (Natick/TR-15/007). U.S. Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center, Natick, MA (2014)
Mauchly, J.W.: Significance test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution. Ann. Math. Stat. 11(2), 204–209 (1940)
Girden, E.: ANOVA: Repeated Measures. Sage, Newbury Park (1992). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mauchly’s_sphericity_test#cite_note-8. Accessed 26 Feb 2016
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center (NSRDEC) research program 14-041. The authors would like to thank those individuals that assisted as data collectors and those Warfighters who volunteered as test participants for their time and effort, as well as for the sacrifices they make every day for our country.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature (outside the USA)
About this paper
Cite this paper
Choi, H.J., Garlie, T.N., Mitchell, K.B. (2019). Effects of Body Armor Fit on Encumbered Anthropometry Relative to Bulk and Coverage. In: Goonetilleke, R., Karwowski, W. (eds) Advances in Physical Ergonomics & Human Factors. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 789. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94484-5_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94484-5_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94483-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94484-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)