Abstract
This study focuses on the effect of body armor fit on Warfighter mobility as measured by range of motion. Forty male active duty military personnel participated in the study with four different body armor configurations: Baseline, Initial Fit, Increased and Decreased sizes. The results indicated that the degradations in the Decreased and Initial Fit sizes were always statistically equivalent to each other, however, mobility in the Increased size were further degraded; 5° for the extension and rotation movements on average and up to 1 inch for flexion and reach. More importantly, across all the movements while wearing an Increased size further degraded mobility by 2.4% on average relative to the Decreased or Initial fit size. Therefore, when evaluated by ROM measurements, there was no benefit to wearing a smaller body armor size to improve mobility relative to the Initial Fit size, but there was a penalty wearing an Increased size.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Mitchell, K.B.: Standard methodology for assessment of range of motion while wearing body armor. Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center (NSRDEC), Natick, MA. NATICK/TR-13/033 (2013)
Garlie, T.N., Choi, H.J.: Characterizing the Size of the Encumbered Soldier. Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center (NSRDEC), Natick, MA. NATICK/TR14/019 (2014)
Mitchell, K.B., Garlie, T.N., Choi, H.J.: Anthropometry and range of motion (ROM) of the encumbered Soldier. Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center (NSRDEC), Natick, MA. NATICK/TR-17/010 (2017)
Choi, H.J., Mitchell, K.B., Garlie, T.N., McNamara, J., Hennessy, E., Carson, J.: Effects of body armor fit on marksmanship performance, In: Goonetilleke, R., Karwowski, W. (eds.) Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. vol. 489, July 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41694-6_35
Headquarters, Department of the Army, Army demographics: FY15 Army Profile, September 2015
Gordon, C.C., Blackwell, C.L., Bradtmiller B., Parham, J.L., Barrientos, P., Paquette, S.P., Corner, B.D., Carson, J.M., Venezia, J.C. Rockwell, B.M., Mucher, M., Kristensen, S.: 2010–2012 Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Personnel: Methods and Summary Statistics. Technical Report (Natick/TR-15/007), U.S. Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center, Natick, MA 01760-2646 (2014)
Mauchly, J.W.: Significance test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution. Ann. Math. Stat. 11(2), 204–209 (1940)
Girden, E.: ANOVA: Repeated Measures. Sage, Newbury Park (1992). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mauchly’s_sphericity_test#cite_note-8. Accessed 26 Feb 2016
Choi, H.J., Garlie, T.N., Mitchell, K.B.: Effects of body armor fit on encumbered anthropometry relative to bulk and coverage. In: Proceedings of 9th International Conference of Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Orlando, Florida (2018, in press)
Mitchell, K.B.: Encumbered range of motion assessment of a novel body armor system designed to improve mobility. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of Soldier Physical Performance, Melbourne, Victoria Australia, 28 November–December 2017 (2017). Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport (JSaMS)
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center (NSRDEC) research program 14-041. The authors would like to thank those individuals that assisted as data collectors and those Warfighters who volunteered as test participants for their time and effort, as well as for the sacrifices they make every day for our country.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature (outside the USA)
About this paper
Cite this paper
Choi, H.J., Mitchell, K.B., Garlie, T.N., DeSimone, L. (2019). Effects of Body Armor Fit on Warfighter Mobility as Measured by Range of Motion (ROM). In: Goonetilleke, R., Karwowski, W. (eds) Advances in Physical Ergonomics & Human Factors. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 789. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94484-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94484-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94483-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94484-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)