Skip to main content

Who Did It, When and How? Treaty Changes, Law Implementation and Interinstitutional Micro-politics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 497 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology ((PSEPS))

Abstract

The chapter presents an approach for analysing interinstitutional micro-politics as a means of shaping the EU system from within. The EU’s institutional system continually develops and changes. This process is driven by conceptual inventions and conceptual and political controversies. Part of these have related to treaty changes, EU law acts or court judgements. In addition, there is another type of actions that have shaped the EU as a democratic polity. The EU’s institutions interact with each other, often via power struggles aiming at strengthening or not losing positions and influence. I define these actions as the EU’s interinstitutional micro-politics. These shape the EU’s political regime from within. In line with the reflexive theoretical background developed in part I, this means including such research dimensions as ideas, agency and political actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benedetto, Giacomo, and Simon Hix. 2007. “Explaining the European Parliament’s Gains in the EU Constitution.” Review of International Organizations 2 (2): 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-007-9019-9.

  • Besson, Samantha, and André Utzinger. 2008. “Toward European Citizenship.” Journal of Social Philosophy 39: 185–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgin, Alexander. 2012. “Norms as Negotiation Resource: The Empowerment of the European Parliament in the Lisbon Treaty.” Uluslararasi Iliskiler-International Relations 9 (35): 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, Thomas. 2015. “Institutional Dynamics Behind the New Intergovernmentalism: The Continuous Process of Treaty Reform.” In The New IntergovernmentalismStates and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era, edited by Christopher Bickerton, Dermot Hodson, and Uwe Puetter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, Thomas, Andreas Follesdal, and Simona Piattoni. 2004. “Informal Governance in the European Union: An Introduction.” In Informal Governance in the European Union, edited by Thomas Christansen and Simona Piattoni, 1–20. Northhampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, Thomas, Gerda Falkner, and Knud Erik JØrgensen. 2002. “Theorizing EU Treaty Reform: Beyond Diplomacy and Bargaining.” Journal of European Public Policy 9 (1): 12–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110104154.

  • Closa, Carlos. 1995. “Citizenship of the Union and Nationality of Member States.” Common Market Law Review 32 (1): 487–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, Henry, and Adrienne Héritier. 2007. “Codecision and Institutional Change.” West European Politics 30 (2): 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701239723.

  • Hix, Simon, and Bjørn Høyland. 2013. “Empowerment of the European Parliament.” Annual Review of Political Science 16 (1): 171–89. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032311-110735.

  • Hummer, Waldemar. 2007. “From ‘Interinstitutional Agreements’ to ‘Interinstitutional Agencies/Offices’?” European Law Journal 13 (1): 47–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00351.x.

  • Kietz, Daniela, and Andreas Maurer. 2007. “The European Parliament in Treaty Reform: Predefining IGCs Through Interinstitutional Agreements.” European Law Journal 13 (1): 20–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00350.x.

  • Kostakopoulou, Dora. 2007. “European Union Citizenship: Writing the Future.” European Law Journal 13 (5): 623–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00387.x.

  • Kreppel, Amie. 2002. The European Parliament and Supranational Party System: A Study in Institutional Development. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. “Looking ‘Up’, ‘Down’ and ‘Sideways’: Understanding EU Institutions in Context.” West European Politics 34 (1): 167–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.523551.

  • Moravcsik, Andrew, and Kalypso Nicolaidis. 1999. “Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: Interests, Influence, Institutions.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 37 (1): 59–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00150.

  • Mourlon-Druol, Emmanuel. 2010. “Filling the EEC Leadership Vacuum? The Creation of the European Council in 1974.” Cold War History 10 (3): 315–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682741003765430.

  • Moury, Catherine. 2007. “Explaining the European Parliament’s Right to Appoint and Invest the Commission.” West European Politics 30 (2): 367–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701239889.

  • Palonen, Kari. 2003. “Four Times of Politics: Polics, Politics, Politicking and Politicization.” Alternatives 28: 171–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palonen, Kari, and Claudia Wiesner. 2016. “The European Council: Second Chamber, Congress of Ambassadors or Federal Presidency?” Parliaments, Estates and Representation 36 (1): 71–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, Mark A. 2003. The Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puetter, Uwe. 2014. The European Council and the Council: New Intergovernmentalism and Institutional Change. 1st ed. Oxford, UK and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, Anne. 2007. “Challenging the Commission’s Right of Initiative? Conditions for Institutional Change and Stability.” West European Politics 30 (2): 244–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701239707.

  • Rasmussen, Anne, and Dimiter Toshkov. 2010. “The Inter-institutional Division of Power and Time Allocation in the European Parliament.” West European Politics 34 (1): 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.523545.

  • Riekmann, Sonja Puntscher. 2007. “The Cocoon of Power: Democratic Implications of Interinstitutional Agreements.” European Law Journal 13 (1): 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00349.x.

  • Rittberger, Berthold. 2003. “The Creation and Empowerment of the European Parliament.” Journal of Common Market Studies 41 (2): 203–25. Accessed June 13, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. “‘No Integration Without Representation!’ European Integration, Parliamentary Democracy, and Two Forgotten Communities.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (8): 1211–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600999532.

  • ———. 2009. “The Historical Origins of the EU’s System of Representation.” Journal of European Public Policy 16 (1): 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802453114.

  • Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998. Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. The New International Relations. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, Frank, Berthold Rittberger, Alexander Bürgin, and Guido Schwellnus. 2006. “Conditions for EU Constitutionalization: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (8): 1168–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600999482.

  • Tömmel, Ingeborg. 2014. The European Union: What It Is and How It Works. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topan, Angelina. 2002. “The Resignation of the Santer-Commission: The Impact of ‘Trust’ and ‘Reputation’.” European Integration Online Papers 6 (14). Accessed October 6, 2016. http://www.eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2002-014.pdf.

  • Wiener, Antje. 1998. European Citizenship Practice. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, Claudia. 2007. Bürgerschaft und Demokratie in der EU. Münster: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018a. “The Micro-Politics of Parliamentary Powers: European Parliament Strategies for Expanding its Influence in the EU Institutional System.” Journal of European Integration 40 (4): 375–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018b. “Shaping Citizenship Practice Through Laws: Rights and Conceptual Innovations in the EU.” In Shaping Citizenship: A Political Concept in Theory Debate, and Practice, edited by Claudia Wiesner, Anna Björk, Hanna-Mari Kivistö, and Katja Mäkinen. [S.l.]: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollenschläger, Ferdinand. 2011. “A New Fundamental Freedom Beyond Market Integration: Union Citizenship and Its Dynamics for Shifting the Economic Paradigm of European Integration.” European Law Journal 17 (1): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00536.x.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Wiesner .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wiesner, C. (2019). Who Did It, When and How? Treaty Changes, Law Implementation and Interinstitutional Micro-politics. In: Inventing the EU as a Democratic Polity. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94415-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics