Skip to main content

Inventing the EU as a Democratic Polity: Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Inventing the EU as a Democratic Polity

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology ((PSEPS))

  • 514 Accesses

Abstract

The introduction presents the book’s approach and core questions. The EU as a democratic polity has been invented: it is a product of innovative actors and thinkers that conceptualised and later realised what for a long time had been a utopia—the unification of Europe. The question of how to conceptualise the new polity has be contested from the very beginning, as concepts, ideas or utopias of European unification differ considerably. The processes of inventing and building the EU thus have been marked by decisive controversies on the character and the shape that the possibly unified Europe should have. It is these very conceptual controversies related to inventing the EU as a democratic polity in both theory and institutional practice and led by both academics and politicians, activists and bureaucrats that are studied in the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Christiansen, Thomas, Gerda Falkner, and Knud Erik Jørgensen. 2002. “Theorizing EU Treaty Reform: Beyond Diplomacy and Bargaining.” Journal of European Public Policy 9 (1): 12–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110104154.

  • Christiansen, Thomas, Knud Erik Jorgensen, and Antje Wiener, eds. 2001. The Social Construction of Europe. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. 2000. On Democracy. Yale Nota Bene. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBardeleben, Joan, and Achim Hurrelmann, eds. 2007. Democratic Dilemmas of Multilevel Governance: Legitimacy, Representation and Accountability in the European Union. Transformations of the State. Basingstoke, UK, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry Jay, and Leonardo Morlino. 2004. “The Quality of Democarcy. An Overview.” Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinan, Desmond. 2004. Europe Recast: A History of European Union. The European Union Series. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, Henry, and Adrienne Héritier. 2007. “Codecision and Institutional Change.” West European Politics 30 (2): 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701239723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hix, Simon, and Bjørn Kåre Høyland. 2011. The Political System of the European Union. 3rd ed. The European Union Series. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ihalainen, Pasi, Cornelia Ilie, and Kari Palonen, eds. 2016. Parliament and Parliamentarism. A Comparative History of Disputes on a European Concept. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs, Markus. 2002. Die Konstruktion Europas: Verfassungsideen und institutionelle Entwicklung. 1. Aufl. Weltpolitik im 21. Jahrhundert Bd. 9. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, Wolfram, and Antonio Varsori, eds. 2010. European Union History. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, Wolfram, Brigitte Leucht, and Morten Rasmussen. 2009. The History of the European Union: Origins of a Trans- and Supranational Polity 1950–72. UACES Contemporary European Studies Series 7. New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauppi, Niilo. 2010. “The Political Ontology of European Integration.” Comparative European Politics 8 (1): 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Toward a Reflexive Political Sociology of the European Union: Fields, Intellectuals and Politicians. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, Reinhart. 1967. “Richtlinien für das Lexikon politisch-sozialer Begriffe der Neuzeit.” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 11: 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. “A Response to a Comment on Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe.” In The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts. New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte, edited by Hartmut Lehmann and Melvin Richter, 59–70. Washington: German Historical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Zeitschichten: Studien zur Historik. 1st ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. “Einleitung.” In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland. I, edited by Otto Brunner, Wener Conze, and Reinhart Koselleck. 8 vols, XIII–XXVII. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. “Begriffsgeschichtliche Probleme der Verfassungsgeschichtsschreibung.” In Begriffsgeschichten: Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen und sozialen Sprache. 1st ed., 365–401. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreppel, Amie. 2010. “Looking ‘Up’, ‘Down’ and ‘Sideways’: Understanding EU Institutions in Context.” West European Politics 34 (1): 167–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.523551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, Ulrich, and Joachim Schild. 2015. Shaping Europe: France, Germany, and Embedded Bilateralism from the Elysée Treaty to Twenty-First Century Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix, Justine, and Kalypso Nicolaïdis. 2010. European Stories: Intellectual Debates on Europe in National Contexts. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Themes in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. 1950. “Citizenship and Social Class.” In Citizenship and Social Class: And Other Essays, 1–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palonen, Kari. 1998. “Judging Politics—A Temporal Perspective.” Redescriptions (Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought) (2): 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. “Die Umstrittenheit der Begriffe bei Max Weber.” In Die Interdisziplinarität der Begriffsgeschichte, edited by Gunter Scholz, 145–58. Hamburg: Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Die Entzauberung der Begriffe. Das Umschreiben der politischen Begriffe bei Quentin Skinner und Reinhart Koselleck. Münster: Lit.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. “The Politics of Conceptual History.” Contributions to the History of Concepts 1 (1): 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. “Reinhart Koselleck on Translation, Anachronism and Conceptual Change.” In Why Concept Matter? Translating Social and Political Thought, edited by Martin Burke and Melvin Richter, 73–92. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Craig. 2003. A Certain Idea of Europe. Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piattoni, Simona. 2010. The Theory of Multi-level Governance: Conceptual, Empirical, and Normative Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 2009. The Concept of Representation [Nachdr.]. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, John. 1998. “The Ideal of Citizenship Since Classical Times.” In The Citizenship Debates: A Reader, edited by Gershon Shafir, 31–41. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Vivien A. 2006. Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–26. Accessed October 29, 2014. http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.

  • ———. 2010. “Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change Through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘New Institutionalism’.” European Political Science Review 2 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1017/s175577390999021x.

  • Skinner, Quentin. 1996. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Reprinted. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. “Rhetoric and Conceptual Change.” Redescriptions (Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought), 60–73. Accessed October 5, 2012. http://www.jyu.fi/yhtfil/redescriptions/Yearbook%201999/Skinner%20Q%201999.pdf.

  • ———. 2009. “A Genealogy of the Modern State: British Academy Lectures.” Proceedings of the British Academy (162): 325–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, Claudia Schrag. 2013. The Struggle for EU Legitimacy: Public Contestation, 1950–2005. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tömmel, Ingeborg. 2014. The European Union: What It Is and How It Works. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Triandafyllidou, Anna, and Ruby Gropas. 2015. What Is Europe? 21st Century Europe. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, Nadia. 2006. Representative Democracy Principles and Genealogy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, Claudia. 2014. Demokratisierung der EU durch nationale Europadiskurse? Strukturen und Prozesse europäischer Identitätsbildung im deutsch-französischen Vergleich. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. “The Micro-Politics of Parliamentary Powers: European Parliament Strategies for Expanding its Influence in the EU Institutional System.” Journal of European Integration 40 (4): 375–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, Claudia, Anna Björk, Hanna-Mari Kivistö, and Katja Mäkinen. 2018. “Shaping Citizenship as a Political Concept.” In Shaping Citizenship: A Political Concept in Theory Debate, and Practice, edited by Claudia Wiesner, Anna Björk, Hanna-Mari Kivistö, and Katja Mäkinen. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, Claudia, and Meike Schmidt-Gleim, eds. 2014. The Meanings of Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wintle, Michael, and Menno Spiering, eds. 2003. Ideas of Europe Since 1914: The Legacy of the First World War. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Wiesner .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wiesner, C. (2019). Inventing the EU as a Democratic Polity: Introduction. In: Inventing the EU as a Democratic Polity. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94415-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics