Abstract
Chiaramonte gives an overview of the main lessons learned from the GFC of 2007–2009 with reference to bank liquidity. The chapter underlines that despite the high levels of capitalization of many banks before the crisis, they too experienced serious difficulties due to insufficient liquidity buffers. Thus, the author provides an evidence that capital and liquidity are equally important for bank stability, in light of which, in 2010, the Basel Committee reviewed the Basel II Accord and introduced new prudential regulations in its place, the so-called Basel III Accord. Finally, Chiaramonte concludes the chapter summarizing both the main strategies adopted by banks to meet the Basel III liquidity ratios and the micro and macroeconomic implications of these requirements identified by the existing literature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReference
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). (2017, December). Basel III: Finalising Post-crisis Reforms. Basel: Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chiaramonte, L. (2018). Conclusion. In: Bank Liquidity and the Global Financial Crisis. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94400-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94400-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94399-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94400-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)