Skip to main content

Forensic Geophysics and the Search of Building Interiors, Peat Bogs and Freshwater

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multidisciplinary Approaches to Forensic Archaeology

Part of the book series: Soil Forensics ((SOFO))

Abstract

Geophysics is one of the assets commonly deployed in the multi-proxy search for targets buried in the ground and concealed in water, most especially associated with criminal activity (e.g. human remains, graves, weapons/explosives/contraband, toxic waste). Here, we review and provide new case studies in three environments: (1) the search for objects inside human-made structures, (2) the search for buried homicide victims and human remains at unknown locations in peat bogs, and (3) the use of water-penetrating radar (WPR) in the detection of human remains in water. The latter section is expanded to the use of WPR as a reconnaissance tool in mapping areas of thickened sediment fill in water bodies, as a possible search area for sunken and then sediment-buried objects. We introduce a new term – ‘sinkability’ – to convey the concept of subaqueous areas of soft sediment where objects such as human cadavers could reside below the sediment surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Barone PM (2016) Understanding buried anomalies: a practical guide to GPR. Lambert Academic Publishers, Saarbrucken

    Google Scholar 

  • Barone PM, Di Maggio RM, Ferrara C (2016a) Forensic geoscience during CS investigations and courtroom trials without a murder. J Forensic Sci Criminol 4(3):302. Annex Publishers . ISSN: 2348-9804

    Google Scholar 

  • Barone PM, Swanger KJ, Stanley-Price N, Thursfield A (2016b) Finding graves in a cemetery: preliminary forensic GPR investigations in the Non-Catholic Cemetery in Rome (Italy). Measurement 80(February):53–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.11.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck SC (2003) Searching for graves using geophysical technology: field tests with ground penetrating radar, magnetometry and electrical resistivity. J Forensic Sci 48:5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy NJ, Eddies R, Styles P, Dods S (2011) Combining ground-penetrating radar and ultrasonic survey techniques: new tools for old problems? First Break 29:69–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly LJ (2003) The applications of forensic geology to help the police solve crimes. Eur Geol J Eur Fed Geol 16:8–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly LD (2008) Subsidence and associated ground movements on the Pennines, northern England. Q J Eng Geol Hydrol 41:315–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly LJ (2013a) The applications of forensic geology and geophysics for police and law enforcement ground searches. Second international conference on engineering geophysics. United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain City, pp 82–86, Keynote Presentation

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly LJ (2013b) The design and implementation of a high-assurance forensic geology and police search following the discovery of the Staffordshire (Anglo Saxon) Gold Hoard. In: Pirrie D, Dawson L, Ruffell A (eds) Environmental and criminal Geoforensics, vol 384. Geological Society Special Publication, London, pp 195–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly LJ, Harrison M (2010) Development of geoforensic strategy & methodology to search the ground for an unmarked burial or concealed object. Emergency Global Barclay Media Limited, Custom Print, Manchester, pp 30–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly L, Harrison M (2013) Geomorphological and geoforensic interpretation of maps, aerial imagery, conditions of diggability and the colour-coded RAG prioritization system in searches for criminal burials. In: Pirrie D, Ruffell A, Dawson LA (eds) Environmental and criminal geoforensics. Geological society special publication no. 384, p 173–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly LJ, Harrison M (2017) Ground searches for graves and buried targets related to homicide, terrorism and organised crime. In: Donnelly LJ. (Guest Editor) 2017. Forensic geology themed issued. Episodes. J Int Union Geol Sci:106–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellwood BB, Owsley DW, Ellwood SH, Mercado-Allinger PA (1994) Search for the grave of the hanged Texas gunfighter, William Preston Longley. Hist Archaeol 28:94–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenning PJ, Donnelly LJ (2004) Geophysical techniques for forensic investigation. In: Pye K, Croft D (eds) Forensic geoscience: principles, techniques and applications. Special publication of the geological society of London, vol 232, p 11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • France DL, Griffin TJ, Swanburg JG, Lindemann JW, Davenport GC, Trammell V, Travis CT, Kondratieff B, Nelson A, Castellano K, Hopkins D, Adair T (1997) Necrosearch revisited: further multidisciplinary approaches to the detection of clandestine graves. In: Haglund WD, Sorg MH (eds) Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 497–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison M, Donnelly LJ (2008) Buried homicide victims: applied geoforensics in search to locate strategies. J Homicide Major Inv 4:71–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilts C (2013) The kilkenny workhouse mass burials: an archaeology of the Irish potato famine. Curr Archaeol 278:12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs NB (1986) Mire morphology and the properties and behaviour of some British and foreign peats. Q J Eng Geol 19:7–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston B, Warke PA, Ruffell A, McKinley J (2018) Detecting voids within a historical building façade: a comparative study of three high frequency GPR antennas. J Cult Herit 24:7–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol L, Viles H (2013) Exposing drying patterns: using electrical resistivity tomography to monitor capillary rise in sandstone under varying drying conditions. Environ Earth Sci 68:1647–1659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina CM, Pringle JK, Saumett M, Evans GT (2016) Geophysical monitoring of simulated graves with resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, conductivity and GPR in Colombia. S Am Forensic Sci Int 261:106–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobes DC (1999) Geophysical surveys of burial sites: a case study of the Oaro Urupa site. Geophysics 64:357–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobes DC (2000) The search for “Yvonne”: a case example of the delineation of a grave using near-surface geophysical methods. J Forensic Sci 45:715–721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pringle JK, Jervis JR (2010) Electrical resistivity survey to search for a recent clandestine burial of a homicide victim, UK. Forensic Sci Int 202:e1–e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pringle JK, Ruffell A, Jervis JR, Donnelly L, McKinley J, Hansen J, Morgan R, Pirrie D, Harrison M (2012) The use of geoscience methods for terrestrial forensic searches. Earth Sci Rev 114(1–2):108–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pringle JK, Jervis JR, Roberts D, Dick HC, Wisniewski KD, Cassidy NJ, Cassella JP (2016) Geophysical monitoring of simulated clandestine graves using electrical and ground penetrating radar methods: 4–6 years. J Forensic Sci 61:309–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pye K, Croft D (2004) Forensic geoscience: principles, techniques and applications. Special Publications 232. Geological Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlins BG, Kemp SJ, Hodgkinson EH, Riding JB, Vane CH, Poulton C, Freeborough K (2006) Potential and pitfalls in establishing the provenance of earth-related samples in forensic investigations. Forensic Sci Int 51:832–845

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JM (2011) An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, 711pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffell A, McAllister S (2014) A RAG system for forensic and archaeological searches of burial grounds. Int J Archaeol 3:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffell A, McKinley J (2008a) Geoforensics. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester. ISBN:978-0-470-05734-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffell A, McKinley J (2008b) Geoforensics. Wiley Interscience, London, 352pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffell A, Pringle JK, Forbes S (2014) Search protocols for hidden forensic objects beneath floors and within walls. Forensic Sci Int 237:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffell A, Pringle JK, Cassella JP, Morgan RM, Ferguson M, Heaton VG, Hope C, McKinley JM (2017) The use of geoscience methods for aquatic forensic searches. Earth Sci Rev 117:323–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strongman KB (1992) Forensic applications of ground penetrating radar. In: Pilon J (ed) Ground penetrating radar. Geological Survey of Canada. Paper 90–4, 203–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsourlos PI, Tsokas GN (2011) Non-destructive electrical resistivity tomography survey at the south walls of the acropolis of Athens. Archaeol Prospect 18:173–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeboah D, Taylor S, McPolin D, Gilfillan R (2013) Pull-out behaviour of axially loaded basalt fibre reinforced polymer rods bonded perpendicular to the grain of glulam elements. Constr Build Mater 38:962–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Mike Langton (Mala Geoscience) for field assistance and advice. Sygma Solutions and Mike Langton facilitated access to high-frequency Mala Geoscience GPR antennas (Figs. 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3). AR wishes to thank Sree Nanukuttan, Geoff Davis, Rachael Parker, Brian Johnston and Lisa Coyle-McLung for access to field sites and invaluable assistance (Fig. 4.1). Sean McAllister (PointPro Ltd) funded the work in Fig. 4.5. Graham Kissock (Police Service of Northern Ireland) is thanked for involving AR in the search shown in Fig. 4.5. Lisa Coyle-McLung and Keith Bennett prompted the work shown in Fig. 4.8. Mark Harrison (Australian Federal Police) and staff of the Centre for Advanced Science and Technology (UK) are thanked for their advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alastair Ruffell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ruffell, A., Donnelly, L. (2018). Forensic Geophysics and the Search of Building Interiors, Peat Bogs and Freshwater. In: Barone, P., Groen, W. (eds) Multidisciplinary Approaches to Forensic Archaeology. Soil Forensics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94397-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics