Abstract
Geophysics is one of the assets commonly deployed in the multi-proxy search for targets buried in the ground and concealed in water, most especially associated with criminal activity (e.g. human remains, graves, weapons/explosives/contraband, toxic waste). Here, we review and provide new case studies in three environments: (1) the search for objects inside human-made structures, (2) the search for buried homicide victims and human remains at unknown locations in peat bogs, and (3) the use of water-penetrating radar (WPR) in the detection of human remains in water. The latter section is expanded to the use of WPR as a reconnaissance tool in mapping areas of thickened sediment fill in water bodies, as a possible search area for sunken and then sediment-buried objects. We introduce a new term – ‘sinkability’ – to convey the concept of subaqueous areas of soft sediment where objects such as human cadavers could reside below the sediment surface.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Barone PM (2016) Understanding buried anomalies: a practical guide to GPR. Lambert Academic Publishers, Saarbrucken
Barone PM, Di Maggio RM, Ferrara C (2016a) Forensic geoscience during CS investigations and courtroom trials without a murder. J Forensic Sci Criminol 4(3):302. Annex Publishers . ISSN: 2348-9804
Barone PM, Swanger KJ, Stanley-Price N, Thursfield A (2016b) Finding graves in a cemetery: preliminary forensic GPR investigations in the Non-Catholic Cemetery in Rome (Italy). Measurement 80(February):53–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.11.023
Buck SC (2003) Searching for graves using geophysical technology: field tests with ground penetrating radar, magnetometry and electrical resistivity. J Forensic Sci 48:5–11
Cassidy NJ, Eddies R, Styles P, Dods S (2011) Combining ground-penetrating radar and ultrasonic survey techniques: new tools for old problems? First Break 29:69–75
Donnelly LJ (2003) The applications of forensic geology to help the police solve crimes. Eur Geol J Eur Fed Geol 16:8–12
Donnelly LD (2008) Subsidence and associated ground movements on the Pennines, northern England. Q J Eng Geol Hydrol 41:315–332
Donnelly LJ (2013a) The applications of forensic geology and geophysics for police and law enforcement ground searches. Second international conference on engineering geophysics. United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain City, pp 82–86, Keynote Presentation
Donnelly LJ (2013b) The design and implementation of a high-assurance forensic geology and police search following the discovery of the Staffordshire (Anglo Saxon) Gold Hoard. In: Pirrie D, Dawson L, Ruffell A (eds) Environmental and criminal Geoforensics, vol 384. Geological Society Special Publication, London, pp 195–208
Donnelly LJ, Harrison M (2010) Development of geoforensic strategy & methodology to search the ground for an unmarked burial or concealed object. Emergency Global Barclay Media Limited, Custom Print, Manchester, pp 30–35
Donnelly L, Harrison M (2013) Geomorphological and geoforensic interpretation of maps, aerial imagery, conditions of diggability and the colour-coded RAG prioritization system in searches for criminal burials. In: Pirrie D, Ruffell A, Dawson LA (eds) Environmental and criminal geoforensics. Geological society special publication no. 384, p 173–194
Donnelly LJ, Harrison M (2017) Ground searches for graves and buried targets related to homicide, terrorism and organised crime. In: Donnelly LJ. (Guest Editor) 2017. Forensic geology themed issued. Episodes. J Int Union Geol Sci:106–117
Ellwood BB, Owsley DW, Ellwood SH, Mercado-Allinger PA (1994) Search for the grave of the hanged Texas gunfighter, William Preston Longley. Hist Archaeol 28:94–112
Fenning PJ, Donnelly LJ (2004) Geophysical techniques for forensic investigation. In: Pye K, Croft D (eds) Forensic geoscience: principles, techniques and applications. Special publication of the geological society of London, vol 232, p 11–20
France DL, Griffin TJ, Swanburg JG, Lindemann JW, Davenport GC, Trammell V, Travis CT, Kondratieff B, Nelson A, Castellano K, Hopkins D, Adair T (1997) Necrosearch revisited: further multidisciplinary approaches to the detection of clandestine graves. In: Haglund WD, Sorg MH (eds) Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 497–509
Harrison M, Donnelly LJ (2008) Buried homicide victims: applied geoforensics in search to locate strategies. J Homicide Major Inv 4:71–86
Hilts C (2013) The kilkenny workhouse mass burials: an archaeology of the Irish potato famine. Curr Archaeol 278:12–17
Hobbs NB (1986) Mire morphology and the properties and behaviour of some British and foreign peats. Q J Eng Geol 19:7–80
Johnston B, Warke PA, Ruffell A, McKinley J (2018) Detecting voids within a historical building façade: a comparative study of three high frequency GPR antennas. J Cult Herit 24:7–10
Mol L, Viles H (2013) Exposing drying patterns: using electrical resistivity tomography to monitor capillary rise in sandstone under varying drying conditions. Environ Earth Sci 68:1647–1659
Molina CM, Pringle JK, Saumett M, Evans GT (2016) Geophysical monitoring of simulated graves with resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, conductivity and GPR in Colombia. S Am Forensic Sci Int 261:106–115
Nobes DC (1999) Geophysical surveys of burial sites: a case study of the Oaro Urupa site. Geophysics 64:357–367
Nobes DC (2000) The search for “Yvonne”: a case example of the delineation of a grave using near-surface geophysical methods. J Forensic Sci 45:715–721
Pringle JK, Jervis JR (2010) Electrical resistivity survey to search for a recent clandestine burial of a homicide victim, UK. Forensic Sci Int 202:e1–e7
Pringle JK, Ruffell A, Jervis JR, Donnelly L, McKinley J, Hansen J, Morgan R, Pirrie D, Harrison M (2012) The use of geoscience methods for terrestrial forensic searches. Earth Sci Rev 114(1–2):108–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.05.006
Pringle JK, Jervis JR, Roberts D, Dick HC, Wisniewski KD, Cassidy NJ, Cassella JP (2016) Geophysical monitoring of simulated clandestine graves using electrical and ground penetrating radar methods: 4–6 years. J Forensic Sci 61:309–321
Pye K, Croft D (2004) Forensic geoscience: principles, techniques and applications. Special Publications 232. Geological Society, London
Rawlins BG, Kemp SJ, Hodgkinson EH, Riding JB, Vane CH, Poulton C, Freeborough K (2006) Potential and pitfalls in establishing the provenance of earth-related samples in forensic investigations. Forensic Sci Int 51:832–845
Reynolds JM (2011) An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, 711pp
Ruffell A, McAllister S (2014) A RAG system for forensic and archaeological searches of burial grounds. Int J Archaeol 3:1–8
Ruffell A, McKinley J (2008a) Geoforensics. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester. ISBN:978-0-470-05734-6
Ruffell A, McKinley J (2008b) Geoforensics. Wiley Interscience, London, 352pp
Ruffell A, Pringle JK, Forbes S (2014) Search protocols for hidden forensic objects beneath floors and within walls. Forensic Sci Int 237:137–145
Ruffell A, Pringle JK, Cassella JP, Morgan RM, Ferguson M, Heaton VG, Hope C, McKinley JM (2017) The use of geoscience methods for aquatic forensic searches. Earth Sci Rev 117:323–327
Strongman KB (1992) Forensic applications of ground penetrating radar. In: Pilon J (ed) Ground penetrating radar. Geological Survey of Canada. Paper 90–4, 203–11
Tsourlos PI, Tsokas GN (2011) Non-destructive electrical resistivity tomography survey at the south walls of the acropolis of Athens. Archaeol Prospect 18:173–186
Yeboah D, Taylor S, McPolin D, Gilfillan R (2013) Pull-out behaviour of axially loaded basalt fibre reinforced polymer rods bonded perpendicular to the grain of glulam elements. Constr Build Mater 38:962–969
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Mike Langton (Mala Geoscience) for field assistance and advice. Sygma Solutions and Mike Langton facilitated access to high-frequency Mala Geoscience GPR antennas (Figs. 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3). AR wishes to thank Sree Nanukuttan, Geoff Davis, Rachael Parker, Brian Johnston and Lisa Coyle-McLung for access to field sites and invaluable assistance (Fig. 4.1). Sean McAllister (PointPro Ltd) funded the work in Fig. 4.5. Graham Kissock (Police Service of Northern Ireland) is thanked for involving AR in the search shown in Fig. 4.5. Lisa Coyle-McLung and Keith Bennett prompted the work shown in Fig. 4.8. Mark Harrison (Australian Federal Police) and staff of the Centre for Advanced Science and Technology (UK) are thanked for their advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ruffell, A., Donnelly, L. (2018). Forensic Geophysics and the Search of Building Interiors, Peat Bogs and Freshwater. In: Barone, P., Groen, W. (eds) Multidisciplinary Approaches to Forensic Archaeology. Soil Forensics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94397-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94397-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94396-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94397-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)