Advertisement

Defining Mutual Awareness: Results of Reactor Operator Surveys on the Emergence of Digital Technology in Main Control Rooms

Conference paper
  • 785 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 778)

Abstract

The last decade has brought tremendous change to control room technologies. Lack of replacement parts and aging infrastructure within the analog systems created a shift, with digital technologies now making their way into nuclear power plant main control rooms in the U.S. These are complex, dynamic and collaborative working environments with potential for human error. The increase in automation coupled with the use of digital human-machine interfaces affords operators the opportunity to transition to seated workstations, yet creates a new set of potential operating issues. Adjusting to the new communication dynamic as well as a learning curve with the new technology creates potential for new types of human error. Finally, the technology shift from analog to digital introduces the risk of cybersecurity breaches. Through literature review and interview feedback from currently licensed operators and human factors experts working in industry, this research identifies several key current concerns.

Keywords

Nuclear power plant Digital control room Mutual awareness 

References

  1. 1.
    Salas, E., Cooke, N.J., Rosen, M.A.: On teams, teamwork, and team performance discoveries and developments. Hum. Factors 50(3), 540–547 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Plott, C., Engh, T., Barnes, V., Szabo, A., Persensky, J.: Technical Basis for Regulatory Guidance for Assessing Exemption Requests from the Nuclear Power Plant Licensed Operator Staffing Requirements Specified in 10 CFR 50.54(m). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC. NUREG/CR-6838 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    O’Hara, J.M., Higgins, J.C., Persensky, J.J., Lewis, P.M., Bongarra, J.P.: Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model (NUREG-0711, Rev. 2). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Savchenko, K.S., Medema, H.D., Boring, R.L., Ulrich, T.A.: Comparison of mutual awareness in analog vs. digital control rooms. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, July 2018 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lin, C.J., Hsieh, T.L., Tsai, P.J., Yang, C.W., Yenn, T.C.: Development of a team workload assessment technique for the main control room of advanced nuclear power plants. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 21(4), 397–411 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Endsley, M.R., Garland, D.J.: Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement – Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mahwah, New Jersey (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Endsley, M.R.: Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors 37, 65–84 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schmidt, K.: Some notes on mutual awareness. In: COTCOS Awareness Sig Workshop, Paris, France (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yuan, X., She, M., Li, Z., Zhang, Y., Wu, X.: Mutual awareness: enhanced by interface design and improving team performance in incident diagnosis under computerized working environment. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 54, 65–72 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wright, M., Kaber, D.: Effects of automation of information-processing functions on teamwork. Hum. Factors 47(1), 50–66 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Juhász, M., Soós, J.K.: Human aspects of NPP operator teamwork, nuclear power - control, reliability and human factors. In: Tsvetkov, P. (ed.) InTech (2011).  https://doi.org/10.5772/17046Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang, C.-W., Yenn, T.-C., Lin, C.J.: Team error analysis in a digitalized control room by using a novel crew reliability model. Hum. Factors Man. 21, 429–439 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lin, C.J., Yenn, T.C., Yang, C.W.: Automation design in advanced control rooms of the modernized nuclear power plants. Saf. Sci. 48(1), 63–71 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nachreiner, F., Nickel, P., Meyer, I.: Human factors in process control systems: the design of human-machine interfaces. Saf. Sci. 44, 5–26 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Min, D.H., Chung, Y.H., Yoon, W.C.: Comparative analysis of communication at main control rooms of nuclear power plants. In: Proceedings of the 9th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA Symposium on Analysis, Design, and Evaluation of Human–Machine Systems, Atlanta, GA (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu, P., Li, Z.: Comparison between conventional and digital nuclear power plant main control rooms: a task complexity perspective, part II: detailed results and analysis. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 51, 10–20 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yenn, T.-C., Lin, C. J., Jou, Y.-T., Hsieh, T.-L., Yang, C.-W.: The effect of human information processing and workload on staffing level in the main control room. In: The 6th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Controls, and Human Machine Interface Technology (NPIC&HMIT), Knoxville, TN (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li, Z., She, M.: Design and evaluation of a team mutual awareness toolkit for digital interfaces of nuclear power plant context. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Inter. 33, 744–755 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hickling, E.M., Bowie, J.E.: Applicability of human reliability assessment methods to human–computer interfaces. Cogn. Technol. Work 15, 19–27 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaber, D., Endsley, M.: Out-of-the-loop performance problems and the use of intermediate levels of automation for improved control system functioning and safety. Process Saf. Prog. 16(3), 126–131 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Endsley, M.R., Kiris, E.O.: The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Hum. Factors 37(2), 381–394 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Woods, D.D.: Visual momentum: a concept to improve the cognitive coupling of person and computer. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 21, 229–244 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Woods, D.D.: Toward a theoretical base for representation design in the computer medium: ecological perception and aiding human cognition. In: J. Flach (1995)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dekker, S.: Patient Safety: A Human Factors Approach. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Porthin, M., Liinasuo, M., Kling, T.: HRA of Digital Control Rooms - Literature Review. VTT-R-00434-16. (2016)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee, K.b., Lim, J.i.: The Reality and response of cyber threats to critical infrastructure. KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. 10(2) (2016)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Canon, S.: How Hard is it to Hack a Nuclear Plant? It takes a lot more than one person for Starters (2017). http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article160156659.html

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature (outside the USA) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Idaho National LaboratoryIdaho FallsUSA

Personalised recommendations