Measuring Mutual Awareness for Digital Human-Machine Interfaces: A Questionnaire for Simulator Studies
- 791 Downloads
As technology shifts from analog to digital in the nuclear power plant (NPP) main control room (MCR), it is important to look into the concept of mutual awareness. As control rooms use teams consisting of at least two reactor operators (ROs) and one senior reactor operator (SRO) to monitor and operate the plant, they depend on efficient teamwork in this collaborative environment. To successfully perform interdependent tasks, achieve their shared goals and high levels of coordination, each crew member has to maintain mutual awareness between each other. Collaboration is more efficient and effective when a high level of mutual awareness is maintained. Being able to evaluate and measure mutual awareness will provide us with the construct for assessing the presence and changes in mutual awareness during the technology shift in NPP MCR. This paper investigates the opportunities to develop a mutual awareness survey based on the mutual awareness model.
KeywordsMutual awareness Main control room Nuclear power plant Teamwork Communication Coordination Backup Automation
Disclaimer and Acknowledgements
The opinions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the author and do not represent official position. This work of authorship was prepared as an account of work sponsored by Idaho National Laboratory, an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately-owned rights. Idaho National Laboratory is a multi-program laboratory operated by Battelle Energy Alliance LLC, for the United States Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517. This research was funded through the Laboratory Directed Research and Development program at Idaho National Laboratory.
- 2.Plott, C., Engh, T., Barnes, V.: Technical basis for regulatory guidance for assessing exemption requests from the nuclear power plant licensed operator staffing requirements specified in 10 CFR 50.54(m). US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, NUREG/CR-6838 (2003)Google Scholar
- 3.O’Hara, J.M., Higgins, J.C., Persensky, J.J., Lewis, P.M., Bongarra, J.P.: Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model (NUREG-0711, Rev.2). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (2004)Google Scholar
- 5.Savchenko, K., Medema, H., Boring, R., Ulrich, T.: Comparison of mutual awareness in analog vs. digital control rooms. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance (2017)Google Scholar
- 8.Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D., Billings, C.E.: Automation surprises. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors & Ergonomics, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (1997)Google Scholar
- 10.Wiener, E.L.: Human factors of advanced technology (‘glass cockpit’) transport aircraft. NASA Technical report 117528. NASA-Ames Research Center, California, USA (1989)Google Scholar
- 11.Savioja, P., Aaltonen, I., Karvonen, H., Koskinen, H., Laarni, J., Liinasuo, M., Norros, L.: Systems usability concerns in hybrid control rooms. In: 8th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies, San Diego, CA (2012)Google Scholar
- 16.Flin, R., O’Connor, P., Mearns, K.: Crew resource management: improving safety in high reliability industries team performance management, vol. 8, pp. 68–78 (2002). ISSN 1352-7592Google Scholar
- 17.Tardan, V., Bourgeon, L., Darses, F.: How do team leaders communicate to develop situation awareness? In: An Exploratory Study in a Nuclear Submarine Simulator. ECCE 2016, 05–08 September 2016, Nottingham, United Kingdom (2016)Google Scholar
- 18.MacMillan, J., Paley, M., Entin, E.B., Entin, E.E.: Questionnaires for distributed assessment of team mutual awareness. In: Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods, 51-1–51-9 (2004)Google Scholar
- 19.Boring, U., Lew, K., Rice, P., Spielman, S.: Analog, Digital, or Enhanced Human-System Interfaces? Results of an Operator-in-the-Loop Study on Main Control Room Modernization for a Nuclear Power Plant. Department of Energy. INL/EXT-17-43188, September 2017Google Scholar