Segmentation and Stillness Make Human Checks Secure

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 778)


The best condition for human to check is that everything is staying at its normal position designated beforehand. Under such circumstance, the checker does not feel time pressure, since nothing is in motion. In addition, the check itself becomes easy; the checker is only required to compare actual positions of things with their regular positions. Although the merit of checking under stillness is a matter of course, we find many bad practices of check under motion in real workplaces today. To realize the best condition, collect segmentation of workflow is required, and it may not be so trivial. This article discusses reason of the merits, design method of workflow segmentation, and actual successful examples.


Human error Workflow design Perceptional psychology Human factors 


  1. 1.
    Knight, J.C., Leveson, N.G.: An experimental evaluation of the assumption of independence in multiversion programming. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 12(1), 96–109 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    US Department of Energy: Crisis Contained – Department of Energy at Three Mile lsland, US Department of Energy (1980)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nassi, I., Shneiderman, B.: Flowchart techniques for structured programming. In: SIGPLAN Notices XII (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Von Neumann, J.: The role of high and of extremely high complication. In: Von Neumann, J.: Theory of Self-reproducing Automata. University of Illinois Press (1966)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dunlap, J.W.: Men and machines. J. Appl. Psychol. 31(6), 565–579 (1947)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Artificial Intelligence Research CenterNational Institute of Advanced Science and TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations