Skip to main content

Endpiece

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Talent Industry
  • 331 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter returns to the original question of the book which was to examine the extent to which the multi-platform environment had changed the ways in which the UK television industry identified, developed and nurtured new talent. In part, this was driven by an industry concern that the online social video space was potentially drawing away new talent from the television sector, against a backdrop of more competition media ecology in which younger people in the UK were watching less mainstream television. The chapter argues that in fact there exists two distinct, but related media sectors. The analogy being that of a Venn diagram that has the television industry in one circle and the social video industry in another, with a grey overlapping section in the middle of the diagram. Easy movement between these two sectors has been more problematic than initially envisaged by the television industry. This was because television wanted to engage with the social video sector on television’s terms. It has taken television a while to understand the differing dynamics of this sector. As YouTube business models have increasingly been shaped by a wider neoliberal, market-driven commercial culture, television has often focused on the audience being assembled by the top online YouTubers and coveted these valuable advertising assets, rather than developing a relationship with the creative talent. The chapter highlights how the definition of talent and the values associated with it differ in these two ecologies and argues that the role of cultural intermediaries will remain crucial, despite the wider changes in the UK television industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bennett, J., & Strange, N. (2018). Adapting to Social Media: Commerce, Creativity and Competition in UK Television Production. London: ADAPT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, R. (2014). Television Sport in the Age of Screens and Content. Television and New Media, 15(8), 746–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, G. (2018). Television Production: Configuring for Sustainability in the Digital Era. Media, Culture and Society, 2, 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, B. E. (2018). (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love: Gender, Social Media, and Aspirational Work. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D., & Goblot, V. (Eds.). (2018). A Future for Public Service Television. London: Goldsmith Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldbart, M. (2018, March 9). Interview with Damian Kavanagh, BBC3. Broadcast, pp. 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. (2005). Reality TV. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. (2007). Restyling Factual TV. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littler, J. (2018). Against Meritocracy: Culture, Power and Myths of Mobility. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, G. (2017). Collaborating to Compete: The Role of Cultural Intermediaries in Hypercompetition. International Journal of Music Business Research, 6(2), 41–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, R. (2017). Early Independent Production Entrepreneurs in UK Television: Pioneering Agents of Neoliberal Intervention. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 9(3), 280–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roussel, V. (2017). Representing Talent: Hollywood Agents and the Making of Movies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. B. (2017). Merchants of Culture: The Publishing Business in the Twenty-First Century (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. (2018). Reflection on A Future for Public Service Television. In D. Freedman & V. Goblot (Eds.), A Future for Public Service Television. London: Goldsmith Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunstall, J. (1993). Television Producers. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, M. (2016). Celebrity: Capitalism and the Making of Fame. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wogan, T. (2006). Born, Made or Just Plain Lucky. In M. Collins (Ed.), Shooting Stars: A Collection of Essays, Musings and Rants on Talent and TV in the Noughties and Beyond. London: Premium.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond Boyle .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boyle, R. (2018). Endpiece. In: The Talent Industry. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94379-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics