Towards Playful Monitoring of Executive Functions: Deficits in Inhibition Control as Indicator for Cognitive Impairment in First Stages of Alzheimer

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 779)


Meaningful treatment of dementia today consists of multi-component interventions, such as, cognitive and also physical, sensomotoric stimulation. A serious game was developed for multimodal training performed by clients and caregivers using easily configurable services on a Tablet PC. A key problem in developing substantial knowledge about dementia and impacting factors is lack of data about mental processes evolving over time. For this purpose, eye tracking data were captured from non-obtrusive sensing during games to enable daily monitoring of dementia profiles. An anti-saccade measuring paradigm was used to detect attention inhibition problems that typically occur in executive function related neurodegenerative diseases, such as, in Alzheimer. In a 6 month study with 12 users a classifier was developed that enables to discriminate dementia stages from extracted eye movement features received from training at home. The playful training and its diagnostic toolbox offer affordances for entertaining users, measuring and analyzing mental process parameters, and enabling people with dementia to stay longer at home to slow down the progress of disease.


Alzheimer intervention system Eye movement features Playful diagnostics Executive functions 



The research leading to these results has received funding from the project PLAYTIME of the AAL Programme of the European Union, by the Austrian BMVIT/FFG (No. 857334), ZonMW, the VLAIO, and the Austrian BMVIT/FFG, by project AMIGO.


  1. 1.
    Sabine, S., Iris, H., Reiner, K.: Wie sich die Regionen in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz auf die Alterung der Gesellschaft vorbereiten können. Berlin-Institut für Bevölkerung und Entwicklung, Demenz-Report, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burns, A., Iliffe, S.: Dementia, BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 338 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Forbes, D., et al.: Exercise programs for people with dementia. Cochrane Datab. Syst. Rev. 12, CD006489 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Norton, S., et al.: Potential for primary prevention of Alzheimer’s disease: an analysis of population-based data. Lancet Neurol. 13, 788–794 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Graessel, E., et al.: Non-pharmacological, multicomponent group therapy in patients with degenerative dementia: a 12-month randomizied, controlled trial. BMC Med. 9, 129 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Korczak, D., et al.: Wirksamkeit von Ergotherapie bei mittlerer bis schwerer Demenz. HTA-Bericht 129, Köln (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crawford, T.J., Higham, S., Renvoize, T., Patel, J., Dale, M., Suriya, A., et al.: Inhibitory control of saccadic eye movements and cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s Disease. Biol. Psychiatry 57, 1052–1060 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McCallum, S., Boletsis, C.: Dementia games: a literature review of dementia-related serious games. In: Ma, M., Oliveira, M.F., Petersen, S., Hauge, J.B. (eds.) SGDA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8101, pp. 15–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kasl-Godley, J., Gatz, M.: Psychosocial interventions for individuals with dementia: an integration of theory, therapy, and understanding dementia (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cerejeira, J., Lagarto, L., Mukaetova-Ladinska, E.B.: Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Front. Neurol. 3, 73 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anderiesen, H., et al.: Play experiences for people with Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J. Des. 9(2), 155–165 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Collette, F., et al.: Phonological loop and central executive functioning in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia 37, 905–918 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kanske, P., Kotz, S.A.: Hum. Brain Mapp. 32(2), 198–208 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuskowski, M.A.: Eye movements in progressive cerebral neurological disease. In: Hillsdale, N.J., Johnston, C.W., Pirozzolo, F.J. (eds.) Neuropsychology of Eye Movements, pp. 146–176 (1988)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    White, O.B., Saint-Cyr, J.A., Tomlinson, R.D., Sharpe, J.A.: Ocular motor deficits in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 106, 571–587 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fletcher, W.A., Sharpe, J.A.: Smooth pursuit dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 38, 272 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaufman, L.D., et al.: Antisaccades: a probe into the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in Alzheimer’s disease. A critical review. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 19, 781–793 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Simpkins, L. K.: Antisaccades: A probe into the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in Alzheimer’s disease, Master’s thesis, University of Toronto (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shafiq-Antonacci, R., Maruff, P., Masters, C., Currie, J.: Spectrum of saccade system function in Alzheimer disease. Arch. Neurol. 60(9), 1272–1278 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Crutcher, M.D., et al.: Eye tracking during a visual paired comparison task as a predictor of early dementia. Am. J. Alzh. Dis. Other Dem. 24, 258–266 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lagun, D., Manzanares, C., Zola, S.M., Buffalo, E.A., Agichtein, E.: Detecting cognitive impairments by eye movement analysis using automatic classification algorithms. J. Neurosci. Methods 201(1), 196–203 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Information and Communication TechnologiesJOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH DIGITALGrazAustria
  2. 2.Sozialverein DeutschlandsbergDeutschlandsbergAustria

Personalised recommendations