Skip to main content

Taking the Lead: Changing the Experience of Family ICU Syndrome by Changing the Organization of Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Families in the Intensive Care Unit
  • 943 Accesses

Abstract

Open and patient-tailored guidelines have been recommended as the preferred family visitation model in critical care settings, but many intensive care units continue to restrict visitation. One of the major developments in modern management theory and research has been its continued focus on better understanding how to introduce and manage organizational change. Leading and managing a change effort within an ICU is not easy and not well suited to the simplistic and over-reductionist models that tend to dominate the popular business literature. Further, while the practice of medicine may be viewed as a business, a fundamental error is made if the differences between providing care and treatment for a person in medical need are ever truly confused or conflated with the purpose, processes, and ethics of producing good or service in a purely economic marketplace. A current example where this confusion is present is in the widespread use of the Plan-Do-Study-Act model of continuous quality improvement (CQI) to change the way in which healthcare services are produced. While useful in some situations, the CQI model was developed foundationally to standardize the structure and processes for producing automobiles and other industrial products – not provide medical care to those in need and suffering. An alternative to overly-simplistic and industrial models of change is presented through the exposition of four key elements of a person-focused approach to ICU care that treats patients as real people, respects and engages with the diversity of families, and releases physicians and other caregivers from the constraints of existing medical bureaucracies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Davidson J, Jones C, Bienvenu O. Family response to critical illness: post intensive care syndrome-family. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(2):618–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sottile P, Lynch Y, Mealer M, Moss M. Association between resilience and family member psychologic symptoms in critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(8):e721.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Verhaeghe S, Defloor T, Van Zuuren F, Duijnstee M, Grypdonck M. The needs and experiences of family members of adult patients in an intensive care unit: a review of the literature. Clin Nurs. 2005;14(4):501–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dokken D, Kaufman J, Johnson B, Perkins S, Benepal J, Roth A, Dutton K, Jones A. Changing hospital visiting policies: from families as “visitors” to families as partners. J Clin Outcomes Manage. 2015;22(1)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Netzer G, Davidson J. Creating patient- and family-focused care in the intensive care unit, Chapter 3. In: Zimmerman D, Osborn-Harrison D, editors. Person focused healthcare management. New York: Springer; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chapman D, Collingridge D, Mitchell L, Wright E, Hopkins R, Butler J, Brown S. Satisfaction with elimination of all visitation restrictions in a mixed-profile intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care. 2016;25(1):46–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Astuto M, editor. Pediatric Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain: Standardization in Clinical Practice (Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain in Neonates and Children). Italiia: Springer; 2013. p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cameron E, Green M. Making sense of change management: a complete guide to the models, tools and techniques of organizational change. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Logan Page Limited; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kotter J. Leading change. Boston/Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Scoville R, Little K. Comparing lean and quality improvement. IHI white paper. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; (Available at ihi.org); 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berwick D, Blanton G, Roessner J. Curing health care: new strategies for quality improvement. J Healthc Qual. 1991;13(5):65–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Curtis J. Intensive care unit quality improvement: a “how-to” guide for the interdisciplinary team. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:211–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gershengorn H, Kocher R, Factor P. Management strategies to effect change in intensive care units: lessons from the world of business. Part III. Effectively effecting and sustaining change. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(3):454–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rogness B, et.al. Flexible ICU visitation hours improve family involvement in care, improvement stories, Institute for Healthcare Improvement. 2009. http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/ImprovementStories/FlexibleICUVisitationImproveFamilyInvolvement.aspx. Accessed Sept 2018.

  15. Reed J, Card A. The problem with plan-do-study-act cycles. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:147–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moseley G. Managing Health Care Business Strategy. Burlington: Jones and Bartlett; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Weber M. Weber’s rationalism and modern society, edited and translated by Tony Waters and Dagmar Waters. New York: Palgrave MacMillan; 1919; 2015. p. 73–127.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cockerham W. Max Weber: bureaucracy, formal rationality and the Modern Hospital. In: Collyer F, editor. The Palgrave handbook of social theory in health, illness and medicine. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Starfield B. Is patient-centered care the same as person-focused care? Perm J. 2011;15(2):63–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zimmerman D. Overview and framework for person-focused healthcare management. In: Zimmerman D, Osborn-Harrison D, editors. Patient-focused healthcare management. New York City: Springer Publishing; 2017. p. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  21. de Silva D. Helping measure person-centred care: a review of evidence about commonly used approaches and tools used to help measure person-centred care, Health Foundation, 90 long acre. London; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moumtzoglou A. M-Health innovations for patient-centered care. Hershey: IGI Global; 2016. p. 1.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Rickert J. Person-focused care and the physician: emphasizing the human condition, Chapter 2. In: Zimmerman D, Osborn-Harrison D, editors. Person focused healthcare management. New York: Springer; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Parsons T. The social system. Glencoe: The Free Press; 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brown S, Rozenblum R, Aboumatar H, Fagan M, Milic M. Defining patient and family engagement in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(3):358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. UNESCO World Report No. 2: investing in cultural diversity and intercultural dialogue. 2009. UNESCO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Parker K, Stepler R. As U.S. marriage rate hovers at 50%, education gap in marital status widens, Fact Tank, Pew Research Center, September, 2017. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/09/14/as-u-s-marriage-rate-hovers-at-50-education-gap-in-marital-status-widens/

  28. Fact Tank. Pew Research Center. 2014. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/12/22/less-than-half-of-u-s-kids-today-live-in-a-traditional-family/.

  29. Gates G. LGBT parenting in the United States, Williams Institute, UCLA. 2013. http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/LGBT-Parenting.pdf

  30. Fact Tank. Pew Research Center. 2014. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/04/30/5-facts-about-the-modern-american-family/.

  31. Fact Tank. Pew Research Center. 2017. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/10/11/the-share-of-americans-living-without-a-partner-has-increased-especially-among-young-adults/.

  32. Fact Tank. Pew Research Center. 2017. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/09/14/as-u-s-marriage-rate-hovers-at-50-education-gap-in-marital-status-widens/.

  33. NCADV. 2015. Domestic violence national statistics. Retrieved from www.ncadv.org.

  34. AMA Code of Medical Ethics. https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ama-code-medical-ethics.

  35. Williams S, Nightingale E, Filner B. The physician’s role in a changing health care system. Chapter 4. In: Medical education and societal needs: a planning report for the Health Professions, Institute of Medicine (US) Division of Health Sciences Policy. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cassel E. The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine. N Engl J Med. 1982;306(11):639–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Winters B, Pronovost J, Miller M, Hunt E. Measuring safety. In: DeVita M, et al., editors. Textbook of rapid response systems. Cham: Springer; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bourdieu, P., (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice, (R. Nice Trans.). Cambridge University Press, New York, Available online: https://archive.org/stream/pierre-bourdieu-outline-of-a-theory-of-practice-1977/pierre-bourdieu-outline-of-a-theory-of-practice-1977_djvu.txt.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schutz A. Some structures of the life-world. In: Schutz I, editor. Collected papers, vol. III: studies in phenomenological philosophy. The Hague: Nijhoff; 1957;1970. p. 116–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald L. Zimmerman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zimmerman, D.L. (2018). Taking the Lead: Changing the Experience of Family ICU Syndrome by Changing the Organization of Care. In: Netzer, G. (eds) Families in the Intensive Care Unit. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94337-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94337-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94336-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94337-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics