Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Families in the Intensive Care Unit pp 315–326Cite as

Respiratory Therapy and Family Engagement in the Intensive Care Unit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation is a lifesaving intervention for many patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). While often necessary, it is a source of distress for the family to experience. Respiratory therapists are an important part of the team caring for mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU. Respiratory therapists interact with families daily as they care for the patient at the bedside. In this chapter, we will examine some of the interactions respiratory therapists have with these families and identify areas of opportunity to engage and empower families to participate in the care of their loved ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Davidson JE. Facilitated sensemaking: a strategy and new middle-range theory to support families of intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Nurse. 2010;30(6):28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sinuff TMDP, et al. “Living with dying”: the evolution of family members’ experience of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(1):154–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davidson JE, Zisook S. Implementing family-centered care through facilitated sensemaking. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2017;28(2):200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tofil NM, et al. Ventilator caregiver education through the use of high-fidelity pediatric simulators. Clin Pediatr. 2013;52(11):1038–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thrasher J, et al. Hospital to home: a quality improvement initiative to implement high-fidelity simulation training for caregivers of children requiring long-term mechanical ventilation. J Pediatr Nurs. 2018;38:114–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wetzig K, Mitchell M. The needs of families of ICU trauma patients: an integrative review. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2017;41:63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Szondy MV, et al. Standardizing family education in a pediatric respiratory care unit. J Pediatr Nurs. 2014;29(3):272–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Skoog M, In Our Unit. The impact of family engagement on anxiety levels in a cardiothoracic intensive care unit. Crit Care Nurse. 2016;36(2):84–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carruthers H, Astin F, Munro W. Which alternative communication methods are effective for voiceless patients in intensive care units? A systematic review. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2017;42:88–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grossbach I, Stranberg S, Chlan L. Promoting effective communication for patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Nurse. 2011;31(3):46–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Freeman-Sanderson AL, et al. Return of voice for ventilated tracheostomy patients in ICU: a randomized controlled trial of early-targeted intervention. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(6):1075–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sutt A-L, et al. The use of tracheostomy speaking valves in mechanically ventilated patients results in improved communication and does not prolong ventilation time in cardiothoracic intensive care unit patients. J Crit Care. 2015;30(3):491–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sutt A-L, Fraser JF. Speaking valves as part of standard care with tracheostomized mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2015;30(5):1119–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McGrath B, et al. Above cuff vocalisation: a novel technique for communication in the ventilator-dependent tracheostomy patient. J Intensive Care Soc. 2016;17(1):19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ten Hoorn S, et al. Communicating with conscious and mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a systematic review. (Report). Crit Care. 2016;20(1):333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Prigent H, et al. Speech effects of a speaking valve versus external PEEP in tracheostomized ventilator-dependent neuromuscular patients. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(10):1681–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Colorado, C.h.o. Ventilator care program: caregiver education. Children’s Hospital of Colorado; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  18. UPMC. When someone you love is on a ventilator. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Burns KEA, Devlin JW, Hill NS. Patient and family engagement in designing and implementing a weaning trial: a novel research paradigm in critical care. Chest. 2017;152(4):707–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gill M, et al. Patient and family member-led research in the intensive care unit: a novel approach to patient-centered research. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0160947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Happ MB, et al. Family presence and surveillance during weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation. Heart Lung J Acute Crit Care. 2007;36(1):47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hunter BC, et al. Music therapy as an adjunctive treatment in the management of stress for patients being weaned from mechanical ventilation. J Music Ther. 2010;47(3):198–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. From Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin. An introduction to patient decision aids. BMJ Br Med J. 2013;347(7918):27–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cox CE, et al. Development and pilot testing of a decision aid for surrogates of patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(8):2327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tearl DK, Hertzog JH. Home discharge of technology-dependent children: evaluation of a respiratory-therapist driven family education program. (Clinical report). Respir Care. 2007;52(2):171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Loerzel VW, et al. Developing the tracheostomy care anxiety relief through education and support (T-CARES) program. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18(5):522–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Amin R, et al. Caregiver knowledge and skills to safely care for pediatric tracheostomy ventilation at home. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52(12):1610–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sterni LM, et al. An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline: pediatric chronic home invasive ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193(8):e16–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fiske E. Effective strategies to prepare infants and families for home tracheostomy care. Adv Neonatal Care. 2004;4(1):42–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Warren ML, et al. An interdisciplinary approach to transitioning ventilator-dependent patients to home. J Nurs Care Qual. 2004;19(1):67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Russ A, Kaufman S. Family perceptions of prognosis, silence, and the “suddenness” of death. Int J Compar Cross-Cult Res. 2005;29(1):103–23.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Scott JB, et al. Apnea testing during brain death assessment: a review of clinical practice and published literature. Respir Care. 2013;58(3):532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Freeman TB. Death perception: how temporary ventilator disconnection helped my family accept brain death and donate organs. Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2015;5(1):9–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Walczak A, et al. Patient perspectives regarding communication about prognosis and end-of-life issues: how can it be optimised? Patient Educ Couns. 2013;90(3):307–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Newson P. The elephant in the room: communication at end of life. Nurs Resident Care. 2012;14(2):96–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Anderson WG, Kools S, Lyndon A. Dancing around death:hospitalist–patient communication about serious illness. Qual Health Res. 2013;23(1):3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Grandhige AP, et al. Respiratory therapists’ experiences and attitudes regarding terminal extubations and end-of-life care. Respir Care. 2016;61(7):891–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Willms DC, Brewer JA. Survey of respiratory therapists’ attitudes and concerns regarding terminal extubation. Respir Care. 2005;50(8):1046.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rocker GM, et al. Canadian nurses’ and respiratory therapists’ perspectives on withdrawal of life support in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2005;20(1):59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment (DL)

Dedicated in loving memory to my little brother Tim LaBarge. Your giving and caring nature inspired many. I miss you dearly.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Maryland Medical Center, Department of Respiratory Care, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Deborah Linehan

  2. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Giora Netzer

Authors
  1. Deborah Linehan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giora Netzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah Linehan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Giora Netzer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Linehan, D., Netzer, G. (2018). Respiratory Therapy and Family Engagement in the Intensive Care Unit. In: Netzer, G. (eds) Families in the Intensive Care Unit. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94337-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94337-4_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94336-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94337-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation