Advertisement

Serbian and Libyan Female Drivers’ Anthropometric Measurements in the Light of the Third Autonomy Level Vehicles

Conference paper
  • 1k Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 781)

Abstract

At level 3 the driver still remains “in-the-loop” due to the inability of the automated system to manage a particular driving situation/environment and anthropometric data are still essential in design. In that aim anthropometric measurements of 193 Serbian and 50 Libyan female drivers have been collected using standard anthropometric instruments and compared using statistical methods - descriptive statistics with Kolmogorov test for normality, linear regression and correlation analysis and comparison of measured anthropometrics using z test. Results obtained in this study are useful to passenger car designers aimed to compete on autonomy level 3 and show that there exist significant differences between Serbian and Libyan female drivers. Future research on other rarely available anthropometric data for other nationalities is recommended, due to globalization trends and constant migrations.

Keywords

Serbian and Libyan anthropometric data Descriptive statistics Linear regression Correlation analysis Z-test for difference of means 

References

  1. 1.
    Goodrich, M.A., Olsen, D.R., Crandall, J.W., Palmer, T.J.: Experiments in adjustable autonomy. In: IJCAI Workshop on Autonomy, Delegation and Control: Interacting with Intelligent Agents. American Association for Artificial Intelligence Press, Seattle, WA (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heide, A., Henning, K.: The “cognitive car”: a roadmap for research issues in the automotive sector. Annu. Rev. Control 30, 197–203 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jullien, B., Pardi, T.: Structuring new automotive industries, restructuring old automotive industries and the new geopolitics of the global automotive sector. Int. J. Automot. Technol. Manag. 13, 96–113 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lu, Z., Happee, R., Cabrall, C.D., Kyriakidis, M., de Winter, J.C.: Human factors of transitions in automated driving: a general framework and literature survey. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 43, 183–198 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Greenblatt, J.B., Shaheen, S.: Automated vehicles, on-demand mobility, and environmental impacts. Curr. Sustain./Renew. Energy Rep. 2, 74–81 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reimer, B.: Driver assistance systems and the transition to automated vehicles: a path to increase older adult safety and mobility? Public Policy Aging Rep. 24, 27–31 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Louw, T., Merat, N.: Are you in the loop? Using gaze dispersion to understand driver visual attention during vehicle automation. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 76, 35–50 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Purucker, C., Rüger, F., Schneider, N., Neukum, A., Fdrber, B.: Comparing the perception of critical longitudinal distances between dynamic driving simulation, test track and Vehicle in the Loop. In: 5th AHFE Conference-Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, pp. 421–430 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Klarin, M.M., Cvijanovic, J.M., Brkić, V.S.: Additional adjustment of the driver seat in accordance with the latest anthropometric measurements of drivers in Belgrade. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D: J. Automob. Eng. 215, 709–712 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klarin, M.M., Spasojević-Brkić, V.K., Stanojević, P.D., Sajfert, Z.D.: Anthropometrical limitations in the construction of passenger vehicles: case study. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D: J. Automob. Eng. 222, 1409–1419 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Klarin, M.M., Spasojević-Brkić, V.K., Sajfert, Z.D., Djordjević, D.B., Nikolić, M.S., Ćoćkalo, D.Z.: Determining the width of the optimal space needed to accommodate the drivers of passenger vehicles using the analogy of anthropometric measurement dynamics and mechanical mechanisms. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D: J. Automob. Eng. 225, 425–440 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klarin, M.M., Spasojević-Brkić, V.K., Sajfert, Z.D., Žunjić, A.G., Nikolić, M.S.: Determination of passenger car interior space for foot controls accommodation. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D: J. Automob. Eng. 223, 1529–1547 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spasojevic Brkić, V., Klarin, M.M., Brkić, A.D.: Ergonomic design of crane cabin interior: the path to improved safety. Saf. Sci. 73, 43–51 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spasojević-Brkić, V.K., Klarin, M.M., Brkić, A.D., Sajfert, Z.D.: Designing interior space for drivers of passenger vehicle. Tehnika 69, 317–325 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hamza, K., Hossoy, I., Reyes-Luna, J.F., Papalambros, P.Y.: Combined maximisation of interior comfort and frontal crashworthiness in preliminary vehicle design. Int. J. Veh. Des. 35, 167–185 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Spasojević-Brkić, V., Milazzo, F.M., Brkić, A., Maneski, T.: Emerging risks in smart process industry cranes survey: SAF€RA research project SPRINCE. Serbian J. Manag. 10, 247–254 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Omić, S., Brkić, V.K., Golubović, T.A., Brkić, A.D., Klarin, M.M.: An anthropometric study of Serbian metal industry workers. Work 56, 257–265 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spasojević Brkić, V.K., Veljković, Z.A., Golubović, T., Brkić, A.D., Kosić Šotić, I.: Workspace design for crane cabins applying a combined traditional approach and the Taguchi method for design of experiments. JOSE 22, 228–240 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Simões-Marques, M., Nunes, I.L.: Application of a user-centered design approach to the definition of a knowledge base development tool. Adv. Ergon. Des. Usability Spec. Popul.: Part II 17, 443 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dondur, N., Spasojević-Brkić, V., Brkić, A.: Crane cabins with integrated visual systems for the detection and interpretation of environment-economic appraisal. J. Appl. Eng. Sci. 10, 191–196 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laapotti, S., Keskinen, E.: Has the difference in accident patterns between male and female drivers changed between 1984 and 2000? Accid. Anal. Prev. 36, 577–584 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Simon, F., Corbett, C.: Road traffic offending, stress, age, and accident history among male and female drivers. Ergonomics 39, 757–780 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barroso, M.P., Arezes, P.M., da Costa, L.G., Miguel, A.S.: Anthropometric study of portuguese workers. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 35, 401–410 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Montgomery, D.C., Runger, G.C.: Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of BelgradeBelgrade 35Serbia

Personalised recommendations