Tackling Autonomous Driving Challenges – How the Design of Autonomous Vehicles Is Mirroring Universal Design

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 781)


In the future, the world will be characterized by highly densely populations, with growing share of mobility-impaired/disabled persons, a critical problem regarding the sustainability of the metropolises, whose resolution may reside in autonomous vehicles. A broader range of users will be allowed a, so far, denied mobility in level 4 and level 5 SAE autonomous vehicles, a goal to be accomplished through Universal Design, a design which intends to be the closest possible to the ideal design. For such purpose, Human Factors and Ergonomics are key. Literature review and research have shown that there is evidence of application of the seven Universal Design principles in these new autonomous vehicles and that, given the nature and purpose of the Universal Design, with the increase of autonomy, there is natural increased evidence of Universal Design. A novel model for interaction of the Universal Design influencers is proposed.


Autonomous driving Universal Design Human Factors Human-systems interface Autonomous vehicles 



This work has been supported by COMPETE: POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007043 and FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within the Project Scope: UID/CEC/00319/2013 and by the European Structural and Investment Funds in the FEDER component, through the Operational Competitiveness and Internationalization Programme (COMPETE 2020) Project nº 002797; Funding Reference: POCI-01-0247-FEDER-002797.


  1. 1.
    Preiser, W.F., Ostroff, E.: Universal Design Handbook. McGraw Hill Professional, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Salvendy, G.: Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. Wiley, Hoboken (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mace, R.: Universal design: barrier free environments for everyone. Des. West 33(1), 147–152 (1985)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., Beale, R.: Universal Design, pp. 365–394. Springer, Heidelberg (2004).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bakowski, D.L., Davis, S.T., Moroney, W.F.: Reaction time and glance behavior of visually distracted drivers to an imminent forward collision as a function of training, auditory warning, and gender. Procedia Manuf. 3, 3238–3245 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gold, C., Körber, M., Lechner, D., Bengler, K.: Taking over control from highly automated vehicles in complex traffic situations: the role of traffic density. Hum. Factors 58(4), 642–652 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lu, Z., Happee, R., Cabrall, C.D., Kyriakidis, M., de Winter, J.C.: Human factors of transitions in automated driving: a general framework and literature survey. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 43, 183–198 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Häuslschmid, R., von Bülow, M., Pfleging, B., Butz, A.: Supporting trust in autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 319–329. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Erlandson, R.F.: Universal and Accessible Design for Products, Services, and Processes. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Agarwal, A., Meyer, A.: Beyond usability: evaluating emotional response as an integral part of the user experience. In: CHI 2009 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2919–2930. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Uotila, M., Falin, P., Aula, P., Vaaranka, P.: Designing luxury: understanding the hidden values and pleasure factors of luxury and high-level design products. In: Digital Proceedings of Fashion Forward, the International Symposium on Fashion Marketing and Management (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience - a research agenda. Behav. Inf. Technol. 25(2), 91–97 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kang, S.R., Lee, E.: User experience: beyond usability. In: 6th Asian Design Conference (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Christophersen, J.: Universal Design 17 Ways of Thinking and Teaching. Husbanken, Drammen (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Story, M.F.: Principles of universal design. In: Universal Design Handbook (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Colquhoun, H.L., Levac, D., O’Brien, K.K., Straus, S., Tricco, A.C., Perrier, K., Kastner, M., Moher, D.: Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 67(12), 1291–1294 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ALGORITMI Centre, School of EngineeringUniversity of MinhoGuimarãesPortugal
  2. 2.BOSCH Car Multimedia Portugal, SABragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations