Skip to main content

Vote Compass NZ 2017: Marketing Insights into Public Views on Policy and Leaders

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Political Marketing and Management in the 2017 New Zealand Election

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Political Marketing and Management ((Palgrave Studies in Political Marketing and Management))

Abstract

This chapter presents a detailed analysis of descriptive statistics from the 250,000+ Vote Compass data set to help us to understand what the market wanted. Analysing the whole sample but also by demographics and each party’s prospective voters, it finds that health was the top issue, closely followed by the economy, then housing, education, social welfare, and the environment. Politicians thus face the challenge of implementing substantial social investment and infrastructure policies while maintaining economic competitiveness. The products offered by Labour, New Zealand First, and the Greens were the most closely aligned with public opinion in terms of policy, while Labour offered the most likeable leadership. National needs to reflect on being the least responsive to public opinion in their policy offering; Labour needs to defend their market share and leader’s popularity; NZ First need to focus on retaining supporters and the Greens work on improving the reputation of their leadership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    While Vote Compass New Zealand 2017 (https://votecompass.tvnz.co.nz/) received 469,000 visits, after excluding those who failed to provide demographic information required for sample weighting and removing duplicate respondents, the effective sample size of unique respondents who participated from August 20, 2017 to September 23, 2017 was 251,364.

References

  • Carifio, James, and Perla, Rocco J. (2007). ‘Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent Myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes.’ Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3): 106–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colmar Brunton. (2017, 30 July). ONE News Colmar Brunton Poll, July 22–27. Report Retrieved 22 February 2018 from http://www.colmarbrunton.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Prelim_ONE-News-Colmar-Brunton-Poll-report-22-27-Jul.pdf.

  • Jacoby, Jacob, and Michael S. Matell. (1971). ‘Three-point Likert scales are good enough.’ Journal of Marketing Research, 8(4): 495–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees-Marshment, J., Y. Dufresne, G. Eady, D. Osborne, C. van der Linden, & J. Vowles. (2015). ‘Vote Compass in the 2014 New Zealand election: Hearing the voice of New Zealand voters.’ Political Science, 67(2): 94–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Lees-Marshment .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lees-Marshment, J., Elder, E., Chant, L., Osborne, D., Savoie, J., van der Linden, C. (2018). Vote Compass NZ 2017: Marketing Insights into Public Views on Policy and Leaders. In: Lees-Marshment, J. (eds) Political Marketing and Management in the 2017 New Zealand Election. Palgrave Studies in Political Marketing and Management. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94298-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics