Abstract
MOOCs are playing an increasingly important role in education systems. Unfortunately, MOOCs are not fully accessible. In this paper, we propose design principles to enhance the accessibility of MOOC players, especially for persons with cognitive disabilities. These principles result from a participatory design process gathering 7 persons with disabilities and 13 expert professionals. They are also inspired by various design approaches (Universal Design for Learning, Instructional Design, Environmental Support). We also detail the creation of a MOOC player offering a set of accessibility features that users can alter according to their needs and capabilities. We used it to teach a MOOC on digital accessibility. Finally, we conducted a field study to assess learning and usability outcomes for persons with cognitive and non-cognitive impairments. Results support the effectiveness of our player for increasing accessibility.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Clark, R.C., Mayer, R.E. (eds.): e-Learning and the Science of Instruction (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119239086
Matthews, C.K., Harrington, N.G.: Invisible disability. In: Braithwaite, D.O., Thompson, T.L. (eds.) LEA’s Communication Series. Handbook of Communication and People with Disabilities: Research and Application, pp. 405–421 (2000)
Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learn. Instr. 4(4), 295–312 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
Rose, D.H., Meyer, A.: A Practical Reader in Universal Design for Learning. Harvard Education Press, Cambridge (2006)
Morrow, D.G., Rogers, W.A.: Environmental support: an integrative framework. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 50(4), 589–613 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008x312251
Wobbrock, J.O., Kane, S.K., Gajos, K.Z., Harada, S., Froehlich, J.: Ability-based design. ACM Trans. Accessible Comput. 3(3), 1–27 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1952383.1952384
Edwards, A.D.: Computers and people with disabilities. In: Extra-Ordinary Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 19–43. Cambridge University Press, December 1995
Iniesto, F., Rodrigo, C.: Strategies for improving the level of accessibility in the design of MOOC-based learning services. In: 2016 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/siie.2016.7751841
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag
Sanchez-Gordon, S., Luján-Mora, S.: Research challenges in accessible MOOCs: a systematic literature review 2008–2016. Universal Access in the Information Society (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0531-2
Bohnsack, M., Puhl, S.: Accessibility of MOOCs. In: Miesenberger, K., Fels, D., Archambault, D., Peňáz, P., Zagler, W. (eds.) ICCHP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8547, pp. 141–144. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08596-8_21
Rodriguez-Ascaso, A., Roldán Martínez, D., Raffenne, E., Buendía García, F., Boticario, J.G., Montandon, L., Santos, O.C.: Accessible lifelong learning at higher education: outcomes and lessons learned at two different pilot sites in the EU4ALL project. JUCS J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 18(1) (2012). https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-018-01-0062
Sánchez Gordón, S., Luján Mora, S.:. Adaptive content presentation extension for open edX. Enhancing MOOCs accessibility for users with disabilities. In: ACHI 2015, pp. 181–183 (2015)
World Health Organization: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organization, Geneva (2001)
Brooke, J.: SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Indus. 189(194), 4–7 (1996)
Van Selm, M., Jankowski, N.W.: Conducting online surveys. Qual. Quant. 40(3), 435–456 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-8081-8
Vallerand, R.J.: Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 29, 271–360 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60019-2
Lee, Y., Lee, J., Hwang, Y.: Relating motivation to information and communication technology acceptance: self-determination theory perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51, 418–428 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.021
Roca, J.C., Gagné, M.: Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: a self-determination theory perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24(4), 1585–1604 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.001
Dupuy, L., Consel, C., Sauzéon, H.: Self-determination-based design to achieve acceptance of assisted living technologies for older adults. Comput. Hum. Behav. 65, 508–521 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.042
Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T., Miller, J.T.: An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 24(6), 574–594 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776
Kizilcec, R.F., Saltarelli, A.J., Reich, J., Cohen, G.L.: Closing global achievement gaps in MOOCs. Science 355(6322), 251–252 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2063
Zahed-Babelan, A., Moenikia, M.: The role of emotional intelligence in predicting students’ academic achievement in distance education system. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2(2), 1158–1163 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.164
Iniesto, F., McAndrew, P., Minocha, S., Coughlan, T.: What are the expectations of disabled learners when participating in a MOOC? In: Proceedings of the Fourth 2017 ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale - L@S 2017 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3051457.3053991
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cinquin, PA., Guitton, P., Sauzéon, H. (2018). Towards Truly Accessible MOOCs for Persons with Cognitive Disabilities: Design and Field Assessment. In: Miesenberger, K., Kouroupetroglou, G. (eds) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10896. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94277-3_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94277-3_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94276-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94277-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)