Design for Me?
In this paper, as a generative contrast to the notion of design “for all”, we present and discuss the potential benefits of a design “for me” approach, where the design process from the starts from, and initially is targeted at, just one person. Given many things developed for a user group or a constructed average user, in this text we describe starting from design for a single user as an alternative approach for achieving useful and useworthy designs. We provide an example from the development of an assistive device as the starting point and discuss how and why this alternative approach should be of interest for everyone interested in usability.
KeywordsDesign User-centered Method
We want to thank everyone involved in the Minimeter project. In addition we want to thank NordForsk for funding the ActivAbles project and the EU for funding the STARR project.
- 1.Anderberg, P.: FACE-disabled people, technology and Internet. Lund University (2006)Google Scholar
- 2.Bødker, S., Kyng, M., Ehn, P., Kammersgaard, J., Sundblad, Y.: A UTOPIAN experience: on design of powerful computer-based tools for skilled graphic workers. In: Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P., Kyng, M. (eds.) Computers and Democracy - A Scandinavian Challenge, pp. 251–278. Gower Publishing (1987). http://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/a-utopian-experience(405d1260-c86f-11de-a30a-000ea68e967b)/export.html
- 3.Bødker, S., et al.: Creativity, cooperation and interactive design. In: Proceedings of 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, pp. 252–261 (2000)Google Scholar
- 4.Bødker, S., Iversen, O.S.: Staging a professional participatory design practice - moving PD beyond the initial fascination of user involvement. In: Proceedings of Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 11–18, January 2002Google Scholar
- 5.Breidegard, B.: Doing for understanding – on rehabilitation engineering design. Lund University (2006)Google Scholar
- 7.Bφdker, S., et al.: Cooperative design: techniques and experiences from the Scandinavian scene. In: Readings in Human–Computer Interaction, pp. 215–224 (1995)Google Scholar
- 8.Chang, Y., et al.: Personas: from theory to practices. In: Proceedings of Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Building Bridges, Nord 2008, pp. 439–442 (2008)Google Scholar
- 10.Dong, H.: Shifting paradigms in universal design. In: Universal Access in Human Computer Interaction, pp. 66–74 (2007)Google Scholar
- 11.Ehn, P.: Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Umeå University (1988)Google Scholar
- 12.Gaver, W., et al.: Anatomy of a failure: how we knew when our design went wrong, and what we learned from it. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2213–2222 (2009)Google Scholar
- 15.Greenbaum, J., Kyng, M.: Introduction: situated design. In: Design at Work, pp. 1–24. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale (1992)Google Scholar
- 16.Hedvall, P.-O.: The Activity Diamond – Modeling An Enhanced Accessibility. Lund University (2009)Google Scholar
- 22.Sears, A., et al.: When computers fade: pervasive computing and situationally induced impairments and disabilities. In: Proceedings of HCI International, vol. 2, pp. 1298–1302 (2003)Google Scholar
- 23.Story, M., et al.: The universal design file: designing for people of all ages and abilities. Des. Res. Methods J. 1(5), 165 (1998)Google Scholar
- 24.Wixon, D., et al.: Contextual design: an emergent view of system design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Empowering People - CHI 1990, pp. 329–336 (1990)Google Scholar