Skip to main content

Degrading Detection Performance of Wireless IDSs Through Poisoning Feature Selection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications (WASA 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10874))

Abstract

Machine learning algorithms have been increasingly adopted in Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs) and achieved demonstrable results, but few studies have considered intrinsic vulnerabilities of these algorithms in adversarial environment. In our work, we adopt poisoning attack to influence the accuracy of wireless IDSs that adopt feature selection algorithms. Specifically, we adopt the gradient poisoning method to generate adversarial examples which induce classifier to select a feature subset to make the classification error rate biggest. We consider the box-constrained problem and use Lagrange multiplier and backtracking line search to find the feasible gradient. To evaluate our method, we experimentally demonstrate that our attack method can influence machine learning, including filter and embedded feature selection algorithms using three benchmark network public datasets and a wireless sensor network dataset, i.e., KDD99, NSL-KDD, Kyoto 2006+ and WSN-DS. Our results manifest that gradient poisoning method causes a significant drop in the classification accuracy of IDSs about 20%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Grosse, K., Papernot, N., Manoharan, P., Backes, M., McDaniel, P.: Adversarial perturbations against deep neural networks for malware classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.04435 (2016)

  2. Xu, W., Qi, Y., Evans, D.: Automatically evading classifiers. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Network and Distributed Systems Symposium (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tibshirani, R.: Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 58, 267–288 (1996)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoerl, A.E., Kennard, R.W.: Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 12(1), 55–67 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zou, H., Hastie, T.: Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J. R. Stat. Soc.: Ser. B (Stat. Methodol.) 67(2), 301–320 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Ambusaidi, M.A., He, X., Nanda, P., Tan, Z.: Building an intrusion detection system using a filter-based feature selection algorithm. IEEE Trans. Comput. 65(10), 2986–2998 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Abraham, A., Jain, R., Thomas, J., Han, S.Y.: D-SCIDS: distributed soft computing intrusion detection system. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 30(1), 81–98 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chebrolu, S., Abraham, A., Thomas, J.P.: Feature deduction and ensemble design of intrusion detection systems. Comput. Secur. 24(4), 295–307 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, Y., Abraham, A., Yang, B.: Feature selection and classification using flexible neural tree. Neurocomputing 70(1–3), 305–313 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mukkamala, S., Sung, A.H.: Significant feature selection using computational intelligent techniques for intrusion detection. In: Bandyopadhyay, S., Maulik, U., Holder, L.B., Cook, D.J. (eds.) Advanced Methods for Knowledge Discovery from Complex Data, pp. 285–306. Springer, London (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-284-5_11

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Barreno, M., Nelson, B., Sears, R., Joseph, A.D., Tygar, J.D.: Can machine learning be secure? In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security, pp. 16–25. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, Q., Li, P., Zhao, W., Cai, W., Yu, S.: A survey on security threats and defensive techniques of machine learning: a data driven view. IEEE Access 99, 1 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wittel, G.L., Wu, S.F.: On attacking statistical spam filters. In: CEAS (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Šrndic, N., Laskov, P.: Detection of malicious pdf files based on hierarchical document structure. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Network & Distributed System Security Symposium, pp. 1–16 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Biggio, B., Fumera, G., Roli, F.: Security evaluation of pattern classifiers under attack. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 26(4), 984–996 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xiao, H., Biggio, B., Brown, G., Fumera, G., Eckert, C., Roli, F.: Is feature selection secure against training data poisoning? In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1689–1698 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Song, J., Takakura, H., Okabe, Y., Eto, M., Inoue, D., Nakao, K.: Statistical analysis of honeypot data and building of Kyoto 2006+ dataset for NIDS evaluation. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Building Analysis Datasets and Gathering Experience Returns for Security, pp. 29–36. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Almomani, I., Al-Kasasbeh, B., Al-Akhras, M.: WSN-DS: a dataset for intrusion detection systems in wireless sensor networks. J. Sens. 2016(2), 1–16 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuncheva, L.I.: A stability index for feature selection. In: Artificial Intelligence and applications, pp. 421–427 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61572514 and 61702539.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Peidong Zhu or Qiang Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dong, Y., Zhu, P., Liu, Q., Chen, Y., Xun, P. (2018). Degrading Detection Performance of Wireless IDSs Through Poisoning Feature Selection. In: Chellappan, S., Cheng, W., Li, W. (eds) Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications. WASA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10874. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94268-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94268-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94267-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94268-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics