Upon the Academic Philosopher Caught in the Fly-Bottle



Philosophy as an academic discipline has grown into something highly specific. This raises the question whether alternatives are available within the academic world itself – what I call the Lutheran view – and outside of academia (with or without support from the inside) – what I call the Calvinist view. Since I defend the thesis that such alternatives partially exist and as yet non-existent possibilities could in principle be realised, the main question thus becomes what prevents us from acting appropriately. In honour of Paul Smeyers, the fitting metaphor has to be the Wittgensteinian fly-bottle.


  1. Biggar Economics. (2017). The economic contribution of the Flemish universities. Brussels, Belgium: VLIR.Google Scholar
  2. Börner, K. (2010). Atlas of science. Visualizing what we know. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  3. Collins, R. (1998). The sociology of philosophies. A global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP (Belknap Press).Google Scholar
  4. De Cauter, L. (2017). De aardappeloorlog en zijn gevolgen: over de ‘ggo-gebeurtenis’ en het ‘Slow Science Manifesto. Oikos, 83(3), 11–29.Google Scholar
  5. De Solla Price, D. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Heesen, R. (2017). Academic superstars: Competent or lucky? Synthese, 194, 4499–4518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Knobe, J., & Nichols, S. (Eds.). (2008). Experimental philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Onfray, M. (2006–2013). Contre-histoire de la philosophie. Paris: Grasset. (Vol.1: Les Sagesses antiques, 2006; vol.2: Le Christianisme hédoniste, 2006, vol.3: Les Libertins baroques, 2007; vol.4: Les Ultras des Lumières, 2007, vol.5: L’Eudémonisme social, 2008; vol. 6: Les Radicalités existentielles, 2009; vol.7: La Construction du Surhomme, 2011; vol.8: Les Freudiens hérétiques, 2013; vol.9: Les Consciences réfractaires, 2013).Google Scholar
  9. Rull, V. (2016). Free science under threat. The current revival of Bernalism and the use of market-based scientific practices are undermining science as we know it. EMBO Reports, 17(2), 131–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Snow, C.P. (1993, orig. 1959). The two cultures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Stengers, I. (2013). Une autre science est possible! Manifeste pour un ralentissement des sciences. Paris: Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond.Google Scholar
  12. Stengers, I. (2017). Another science is possible: A manifesto for slow science (S. Muecke, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press (adapted translation of Stengers (2013)).Google Scholar
  13. Van Bendegem, J. P. (2011). Extended review of Susan Petrilli, Signifying and Understanding: Reading the Works of Victoria Welby and the Signific Movement (Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2009). Historiographia Linguistica, 38(3), 382–388.Google Scholar
  14. Watts, D. J. (1999). Small worlds. The dynamics of networks between order and randomness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Logic and Science-PhilosophyVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations