Abstract
It has long been a complaint of philosophers of education and other educational researchers that, in particular policy makers pay little heed to their arguments and evidence. Equally, policy makers complain that too much educational research is irrelevant or uninformative or fails to dress their concerns. Despite the almost exponential growth in the quantity of educational research, this seems to have little impact, to “leave everything as it is”.
This paper will explore this problem through four lines of thought:
-
(i)
by looking at the role of the communicative and social practices that take philosophy and other forms of educational inquiry into practice and policy;
-
(ii)
by looking at the logic of arguments that might take us from philosophical work (in particular) to convincing prescriptions for educational policy and practice;
-
(iii)
by looking at the controversy and uncertainty that is intrinsic to research endeavour as a barrier to its impact on policy and practice;
-
(iv)
by looking at philosophical interest as something detached from engagement with policy or practice.
It will conclude that there are a number of compelling reasons why we should have low expectations of the impact on policy or practice of philosophical and other work characterised and communicated in the ways set out here.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
There are exceptions: how refreshing to read writers of case studies being urged to achieve the narrative vitality of a best-selling novel!
References
Bridges, D. (2015). Working without shame in international education: From consequentialism to casuistry? Ethics and Education, 10(3), 271–284.
Bridges, D., & Watts, M. (2008). Educational research and policy: Epistemological considerations. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(Supplement1), 41–62.
Edwards, A., Sebba, J., & Rickinson, M. (2007). Working with users: Some implications for educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 35(5), 647–661.
Horsthemke, K. (2017). #Facts MustFall–Education in a post-truth, post-truthful world. Ethics and Education, 12(3), 273–289.
Keyes, R. (2004). The post-truth era: Dishonesty and deception in contemporary life. New York: St Martins.
MacFarlane, B. (2009). Researching with integrity: The ethics of academic inquiry. New York/London: Routledge.
Peters, R. S. (1967). What is an educational process? In R. S. Peters (Ed.), The concept of education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Pring, R. (2001). The virtues and vices of an educational researcher. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35(3), 407–422.
Richards, I. A. (Ed.). (1966). Plato’s republic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
Sutherland, W. J., Spiegelhalter, D., & Burgman, M. A. (2013). Twenty tips for interpreting scientific claims. Nature, 503, 335–337.
Tight, M. (2017). Higher education journals: Their characteristics and contribution. Higher Education Research and Development. Downloaded as a pre-publication e-print at http://www.research.lancs.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/higher-education-journals(e174a909-2219-4b70-a3ea-103e3dde7e7b)/export.html 30th November 2017
Times Higher Education. (2017, November 16). Too many higher education journals – Here are the best ones. pp. 9–10.
Ware, M., & Mabe, M. (2012). An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. The Hague, The Netherlands: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers.
White, J. P. (1973). Towards a compulsory curriculum. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
White, J. P. (2007). What schools are for and why? (IMPACT Paper No 14). Oxford, UK: Wiley/Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain.
White, J. P. (2008). Aims as policy in primary education. Research Survey 1/1. In R. Alexander (Ed.), The primary review. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.
Whitty, G. (2006). Education(al) research and education policy making: Is conflict inevitable? British Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 159–176.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bridges, D. (2018). Why, Perhaps, Philosophers of Education (and Other Educational Researchers) “Leave Everything as It Is”. In: Ramaekers, S., Hodgson, N. (eds) Past, Present, and Future Possibilities for Philosophy and History of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94253-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94253-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94252-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94253-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)